Skip to comments.
Blaze Exclusive: Donald Trump's Possible Third Party Run Gains Momentum
The Blaze ^
| December 29th
| Mike Opelka
Posted on 12/30/2011 6:39:57 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
The potential for a third party presidential run from billionaire developer and reality TV star Donald Trump may be closer to becoming a reality show of its own.
The Blaze received a copy of a confidential email sent out late Thursday afternoon from a Florida Tea Party leader and personal friend of Trump. The email requested assistance in building a team in Texas to make certain that, if Trump chooses to run, his name would be on the ballot.
The email included:
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdparty; donaldtrump; egomania; perot2point0; ricksantorum; santorum; thirdparty; trump; trumpery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: TomGuy
“Perot was just a sideshow.”
That’s not how I remember it. The lib media pushed Clinton, and Perot had a personal vendetta against Bush and peeled off enough votes to give Clinton the victory. BC didn’t even need close to 50% of the votes to win....Third Party candidates give Dems victories. Most people are conservative/libertarian leaning. Dems need third party candidates to win.
41
posted on
12/30/2011 7:34:18 AM PST
by
Fu-fu2
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
To: Anti-Bubba182
LOL. I like the way you put it.
Of course Trump will never run.
For starter’s, he would never entrust his business empire to his children or to a consortium of lawyers. Trump is a hand’s-on guy and the center of his own universe.
43
posted on
12/30/2011 7:37:50 AM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
To: skeeter
Obama indeed has about 45% of the vote locked up. Now there is the potential for the remaining vote to be carved up among Romney, Trump, Paul and Johnson. A progressive’s dream.
44
posted on
12/30/2011 7:41:11 AM PST
by
JimSEA
(The future ain't what it used to be.)
To: bkepley
Yes, but what if he thinks it will increase his name brand to the point of winning the presidency? Isn’t that the question?
45
posted on
12/30/2011 7:42:39 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
46
posted on
12/30/2011 7:43:26 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: AmericanVictory
Yes, but what if he thinks it will increase his name brand to the point of winning the presidency? Isnt that the question?You really truly believe it will make any difference? I think it's more likely the world ends in 2012 anyway.
47
posted on
12/30/2011 7:47:02 AM PST
by
bkepley
To: G Larry
Not this sh*t again.Our primary system is looking like a circus run by the MSM,third party clowns and RINO’s.Obama,moochelle and axledunce sitting in the stands eating popcorn.
48
posted on
12/30/2011 7:48:34 AM PST
by
shanover
(All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree.-J.Madison)
To: onyx
You’re right, Trump will not run as a 3rd party candidate.
But Ron Paul will. (Has Racist Ron EVER promised he wouldn’t?)
49
posted on
12/30/2011 7:50:14 AM PST
by
CainConservative
( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, and Bachmann in the Cabinet!!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Trump will only get enough support to guarantee an Obama win. He wouldn't even get a fraction of the support that Ross Perot got.
I don't like Romney; he was my Gov. for one term, but I'll vote for him in a heartbeat, if it's a choice between him and Obama. If we can get a more conservative Congress, it would be a win, all around.
50
posted on
12/30/2011 7:52:19 AM PST
by
SuziQ
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Trump must be in need of Soros cash. That’s the only explanation I can think of.
51
posted on
12/30/2011 7:55:01 AM PST
by
denydenydeny
(The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
To: SuziQ
If you put a gun to my head I’ll vote for Obama before Trump. Voting for Trump is like giving the country the finger.
52
posted on
12/30/2011 7:55:10 AM PST
by
bkepley
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
This is exactly how husseins mini-me Chicago bud and Axelrod “hope and change” test subject Gov “Coupe” Deval Patrick won a second term in here in MA with less than 50% of the vote.
Great.....
53
posted on
12/30/2011 7:56:40 AM PST
by
mowowie
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
False flags on every horizon.
54
posted on
12/30/2011 7:57:53 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Republican establishment: a Death Panel for Conservatism.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
It would have to be Trump over Romney for me. You're another fan of the Kelo decision like Trump, apparently.
55
posted on
12/30/2011 7:58:33 AM PST
by
denydenydeny
(The more a sys<tem is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
HE IS A TOOL FOR THE DEMOCRATS.... TRUMP IS A PHONEY!
56
posted on
12/30/2011 8:00:04 AM PST
by
ncfool
(The new USSA - United Socialist States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
To: mowowie
This is exactly how husseins mini-me Chicago bud and Axelrod hope and change test subject Gov Coupe Deval Patrick won a second term in here in MA with less than 50% of the vote. Exactly right. Baker didn't run a great campaign--granted--but Tim Cahill was the kicker.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Anyone pushing Trump as a better alternative to Romney will have to make the conservative argument. And as someone who has looked into Trumps political background, I can tell you, you're gonna have a really tough sell. The conservative track record is non-existent. He's all over the map politically. His record is all talk. His financial support mostly goes to what would be considered an enemies list of conservatism. Anyone predicting what a president Trump would do is just projecting their hopes onto a blank canvas.
A Trump presidential run would be no different than a Ron Paul campaign. A small group of zealous fringers trying to convince the sane world their candidate isn't a misguided jackass.
58
posted on
12/30/2011 8:13:17 AM PST
by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
59
posted on
12/30/2011 8:14:08 AM PST
by
Matchett-PI
("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
To: CainConservative
Youre right, Trump will not run as a 3rd party candidate.
But Ron Paul will. (Has Racist Ron EVER promised he wouldnt?)Ron Paul always runs, and you're right, he has not promised that he won't.
Given his advanced age, I am left to ponder whether he will run this time, for the following reasons:
1. If he's seen as the reason for obama's reelection, his son Rand Paul will pay the price in 2016 when he mounts his own run. 2. Gary Johnson has already announced for the Libertarian Party. Will they agree to run together?
60
posted on
12/30/2011 8:31:16 AM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson