Will the media take note? This story doesn't comport well with their desired narrative...
1 posted on
12/26/2011 8:40:47 AM PST by
TBBT
To: TBBT
...and the thot plickens...
2 posted on
12/26/2011 8:49:38 AM PST by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: TBBT
Do we smell fish from the Republican establishment?
3 posted on
12/26/2011 8:49:38 AM PST by
EagleUSA
To: TBBT
The media better take note.
One small problem with that: as Winger argues, the rules were allegedly drastically changed. In November of this year.
There should be law suits in the works. If this is true Newt and Perry will be on the ballot.
To: TBBT
HMMMMMMMMMMM
VA doing a stop-da-noot.
5 posted on
12/26/2011 8:54:44 AM PST by
DeaconRed
(Hound Dog Howling . . . Bull Frog Croaking -- Everything is broken--Thanks to ZERO)
To: TBBT
>> allegedly drastically changed
What is all this baloney about ‘allegedly changed the rules’, they either did or they didn’t. It should be easily provable one way or the other.
To: TBBT
To: TBBT
I always tell my candidates that if we need X number of signatures, I want 2 or 3X that turned in, and we focus our efforts on doing that so our butts are protected.
That doesn’t speak to the screwed up system they got there and changing the rules mid-stream. But in the end if you got 2 or 3 times the signatures you need you’re golden no matter what. I’m sympathetic but to a point. Harsh but sometimes the best offense is a good defense.
10 posted on
12/26/2011 9:04:54 AM PST by
Free Vulcan
(Election 2012 - No Prisoners. No Mercy.)
To: TBBT
I believe the VA GOP is fixin to be in hot water. They tried to be slick and now they look like cheats. This will hurt Romney as well as the Lt. Governor.
I expect Perry and Newt to both be on the ballot.
11 posted on
12/26/2011 9:06:15 AM PST by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: TBBT
“Did the VA GOP change the rules on primary ballot access in November 2011?”
Yes, and it brought in the grandson of Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto to plan the attack. Tora ... tora ... tora. Newt was about as well prepared as we were at Pearl Harbor.
14 posted on
12/26/2011 9:14:09 AM PST by
bwc2221
To: TBBT
The article makes a fundamental and valid point that can be applied to any state—a candidate who has run for president in a prior election cycle will have the advantage of experience and recognition. It is never a level playing field when one candidate has been through the process before, and ultimately the other candidates can claim ignorance when things don’t go their way.
15 posted on
12/26/2011 9:14:27 AM PST by
Burkean
(.)
To: TBBT
![](http://www.algintech.com/VAGOP-Letter-Primary-2012.gif)
More info about the undated letter can be found on this thread.
Romney submitted 16,000 sigs. Perry 12,000, and Newt 11,000.
The rumor is that Newt was bounced because he dropped below 400 in one or two districts. A couple of the NOVA districts around DC are 90% Dem, and finding a Republican there (who will admit it) is like finding a needle in a haystack.
17 posted on
12/26/2011 9:17:44 AM PST by
Gideon7
To: TBBT
The death throes of the Republican elephant are so ugly.
24 posted on
12/26/2011 9:47:23 AM PST by
EternalVigilance
(With God Obama can't hurt us. Without God, George Washington couldn't save us.)
To: TBBT
one (Romney) had more than enough signatures (15K) to bypass the verification process entirely. Not true. Even if you believe the undated letter of RPV Chair Pat Mullins is valid and the way the certification process was carried out, any candidate with over 15,000 signatures would have to have 600 valid signatures from each of the 11 Cogressional districts.
30 posted on
12/26/2011 9:55:29 AM PST by
kabar
To: TBBT
"But we used to be able to cheat!" I hope they can find a better claim than that...
32 posted on
12/26/2011 10:02:37 AM PST by
mrsmith
(Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
To: TBBT
The described events have Repubic Establishment stink all over them.
45 posted on
12/26/2011 10:28:25 AM PST by
YHAOS
(you betcha!)
To: TBBT
The establishment is manipulating the rules to circumvent the intent of the voters -- period exclamation!
47 posted on
12/26/2011 10:30:16 AM PST by
Gene Eric
(Save a pretzel for the gas jets.)
To: TBBT
Saw a story where Perry is filing suit in federal court to get the entire primary access rule regarding number of signatures tossed on the grounds of voter disenfranchisement. Be interesting to see if it goes anywhere and if any of the other candidates will jump on board or would rather watch from a distance in case Perry get accused of “sour grapes” and using the federal courts to accomplish what he can't on the ground.
66 posted on
12/26/2011 11:00:50 AM PST by
apillar
To: TBBT
Saw a story where Perry is filing suit in federal court to get the entire primary access rule regarding number of signatures tossed on the grounds of voter disenfranchisement. Be interesting to see if it goes anywhere and if any of the other candidates will jump on board or would rather watch from a distance in case Perry get accused of “sour grapes” and using the federal courts to accomplish what he can't on the ground.
67 posted on
12/26/2011 11:00:55 AM PST by
apillar
To: TBBT
The bottom line is that no one knows whether a single signature for Romney is valid because with 15,000 they just qualify you and don't bother checking. So, under the new rules, Newt and Perry just didn't tell a big enough lie.
80 posted on
12/26/2011 11:30:31 AM PST by
Rashputin
(Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
To: TBBT
When I heard this news, I knew that the ‘fix’ was in.
It seems that TPTB don’t even want to take a chance that
Myth might not win the primary.
82 posted on
12/26/2011 11:34:17 AM PST by
jusduat
(probably lost)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson