>> allegedly drastically changed
What is all this baloney about ‘allegedly changed the rules’, they either did or they didn’t. It should be easily provable one way or the other.
They did exactly that. Actually in September. It was posted here on another thread.
What is all this baloney about ‘allegedly changed the rules’, they either did or they didn’t. It should be easily provable one way or the other.
Exactly.
I note how it's "obey the 11th Amendment" time when it's "their" candidate who's being criticized or taking it in the shins, but it's rush in and accuse Republicans who volunteer to run our elections of corruption, deception and slime when the result is not in "their" candidate's favor.
It's a pretty safe bet that, had Newt made the ballot, he would be the first to be out there defending the process and admonishing those candidates who didn't make the cut that it was just too bad, they should have understood and played by the rules.
It was known even before November that Newt was going to have a very tough time making the ballot:
Could GOP Presidential candidates fail to make the Virginia ballot?