Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt takes no-adultery pledge
Politico ^

Posted on 12/12/2011 11:33:17 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Newt takes no-adultery pledge

By ALEXANDER BURNS | 12/12/11 1:09 PM EST

When the Iowa social conservative group The Family Leader unveiled a sweeping pledge on marriage and abortion over the summer, Newt Gingrich was one of the candidates who passed on signing it.

Now, Gingrich has answered the pledge with a lengthy written response, vowing to support a federal marriage amendment, reinstate the Mexico City policy -- and, per the stipulations of The Family Leader pledge, to be faithful to his wife:

I also pledge to uphold the institution of marriage through personal fidelity to my spouse and respect for the marital bonds of others.

Gingrich's full response after the jump ...

To Bob Vander Plaats and the Executive Board of The FAMiLY LEADER:

I appreciate the opportunity to affirm my strong support of the mission of the FAMiLY LEADER by solemnly vowing to defend and strengthen the family through the following actions I would take as President of the United States.

Defending Marriage. As President, I will vigorously enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, which was enacted under my leadership as Speaker of the House, and ensure compliance with its provisions, especially in the military. I will also aggressively defend the constitutionality of DOMA in federal and state courts. I will support sending a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman to the states for ratification. I will also oppose any judicial, bureaucratic, or legislative effort to define marriage in any manner other than as between one man and one woman.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: adultery; doma; gingrich; homosexualagenda; newt; newt2012; noadultery; noadulterypledge; pledge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last
To: riverdawg

My post was about the fact that he has CHANGED. Read what his daughter said about that.

;-)


81 posted on 12/12/2011 12:46:38 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
This latest ploy from Newt is as transparent as his lies.

On the surface, this does not play well for Newt, it just sets up too many retorts, given his history. But in reading the article, this was part of a larger social conservatism pledge by a group in Iowa for candidates to commit to. So I think it has to be placed in that context as well.

82 posted on 12/12/2011 12:47:13 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Newt cheats on his former wives every day at Free Republic.


83 posted on 12/12/2011 12:47:48 PM PST by Chunga (What a load of codswallop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And why are we suppose to think he will take this pledge any more seriously than his first two wedding vows?


84 posted on 12/12/2011 12:49:26 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
No. Those were vows. This is a pledge. ;-)

-PJ

85 posted on 12/12/2011 12:49:47 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“All they want is your phone number anyway.......... “

Huh?

“Well, that finally does it, string the dude up.”

Is this sarcasm?


86 posted on 12/12/2011 12:49:52 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Yes, I agree. At 67 I believe him!


87 posted on 12/12/2011 12:50:29 PM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Politico is spinning this (surprise). The pledge to be faithful to marriage was just one element:

Now, Gingrich has answered the pledge with a lengthy written response, vowing to support a federal marriage amendment, reinstate the Mexico City policy -- and, per the stipulations of The Family Leader pledge, to be faithful to his wife.

But Politico ran with just the one part because it allowed them to create an eyebrow-raiser headline.

88 posted on 12/12/2011 12:50:48 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All
Spreading lies from Salon, I see.

We have daughter Jackie's account of that so-called death bed "cornering" of her mom by Newt.

Her mother is alive and well. The cancer surgery was not as the tumor was benign.

89 posted on 12/12/2011 12:53:04 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mrreaganaut

“better late than never?” ping


90 posted on 12/12/2011 12:53:20 PM PST by reaganaut (Romney IS Obama - just 'white and delightsome' 2 Nephi 30:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That’s generally included in your standard Christian marriage vows, but what do I know?


91 posted on 12/12/2011 12:53:55 PM PST by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I don't know how this pledge by the conservative group The Family Leader read, but if it was to vow not to commit adultery he couldn't sign it as he has already committed adultery. He has instead pledged to be faithful to his current wife.

Newt has confessed his sins and has asked for forgiveness.

92 posted on 12/12/2011 12:59:35 PM PST by Spunky (Sarah Palin on Polls "Poles are for Strippers and Cross Country Skiers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

A thousand times NO.
You cannot have my phone number!


93 posted on 12/12/2011 12:59:43 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

98 story. no where does it mention she was on her deathbed.

It said RECOVERING.

Did he or didn’t he pay his alimony and CHILD support?

Did the Baptist Church have to help the family?


94 posted on 12/12/2011 1:00:47 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Irrelevant. His creator kept his promise to Newt. He died for his sin and in accepting that gift, Newt became justified in the eyes of God Almighty. That's enough for me. As the Bible passage goes: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Do you really want to go there? Everybody is fallible. Everybody has feet of clay. I'm a Calvinist, so I believe in the doctrine of universal and radical depravity of man. Even Christians sin. In my personal salvation, I did my part. I sinned. Jesus did his part, he gave his life for that sin. On that basis, I'm going to cut Newt a huge break on this topic. Remember, if you even think of the sin, it's the same as doing it. So which of you is blameless?

Irrelevant. The question is, can we trust him to keep the vow he just issued? All we have to go on is his track record.

95 posted on 12/12/2011 1:03:27 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Never mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I can't believe everyone dissing Newt when FDR had a mistress in the WH, Kennedy had his Monroe, and Clinton had a dozen, some of which weren't even rapes. He's not even president yet and we already have Newt derangement syndrome. This topic will be a loser, in the long run, IMO.

The question is do we want jobs or an idiot that stayed married.

96 posted on 12/12/2011 1:04:31 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
"When did my party start bowing to the bob van plaats of the world"

As far back as I can remember. At least since Jerry Falwell's heyday. The Republicans realized they had to carve out a southern constituency if they wanted to win national elections, so they turned to the evangelicals. They wooed blacks first by backing Civil Rights legislation, but that went down the drain after the media (as unfairly as is humanly imaginable) painted Goldwater as a racist. I'm too young to remember the Nixon days very well, but I believe Billy Graham played a big part in getting him nominated and elected.


97 posted on 12/12/2011 1:07:03 PM PST by CowboyJay (Lowest Common Denominator 2012 - because liberty was overrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: surfer
How about the no big government pledge?
no progressive pledge?
no political correctness pledge?
no spending pledge?
no trampling the constitution pledge?
I could go on for days!!!

Amen, amen, and amen. I'm with you!

98 posted on 12/12/2011 1:07:17 PM PST by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012! (That's my story and I'm sticking to it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

.... for some reason I think bragging about this would not be smart for him to do. Thanks for the laugh.


99 posted on 12/12/2011 1:13:00 PM PST by sickoflibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The question is, can we trust him to keep the vow he just issued?

That's not at all the same question you posed in the previous post. Vows to God about sin are impossible to keep. That was the entire point of the crucifixtion and resurrection. Political vows to the electorate are certainly possible to keep and I trust Newt to keep his word and not fall back into his old ways. Just as God has given him redemption, I feel I must as well. Trust, but verify, too. I guess my overriding concern here is that I personally think he's the best man for the job. You may think differently. That's okay. Right?

100 posted on 12/12/2011 1:19:59 PM PST by ExSoldier ("Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil: It has no point.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson