This is almost as bad as Romneycare...
Crap.
Why are people posting articles that are negative to Newt? This will not make the gingbats happy!
“After the election”
wow.
They don’t want voters to see it before the election I bet.
Romney’s book
“How To Trick Conservatives for Dummies” is coming out after the election too!
Looks like one way or another, we’re going to get that third Bush term.
One can only guess what that will usher in. And I thought the follow-on to two terms was bad enough.
This Terry Maple is an odd creature. What the hell is an environmental psychologist?
http://www.psychology.gatech.edu/people/emeriti/maple_terry.php
It will be Newt or Mitt. I will vote for either one. Who ever the Republican candidate is will get my vote! Republicans should not be tearing into any Republican candidate! If you favor one over another, then build your candidate up with his or her positive aspects. Don’t use negative tactics in the primary race. Not a good idea.
Watch, out Mr. Gore, someone is going to eat your lunch. By the time Gingrich is through, Gore will look like an oil refinery owner.
Don’t worry. President Gingrich will use all his professorial brilliance to explain how FAIR the new carbon tax will be to all Americans. After all, it will have been fully negotiated with our global partners!
As soon as they say they believe in man-made global warming or its successor fraud, climate change, I write them off as cheap politicians or fools or both.
I’ve noticed this is the only subject he refuses to pontificate about. I choose to interpret that as he is in the Gore camp.
I had a brief couple of weeks flirtation with the guy. He’s now off my acceptable list.
No matter how many “Climate Gate” dumps of thousands of e-mails with the global warming “scientists” admitting their fraud, the drum beat for more government and less productive human activity.
Of course, this is to be expected from the Left wing crazies, but what gets me sick is that in an election in which we have a radical marxist as our opponent and the results of his ideology on display in the form of record unemployment, rising prices and crushing debt, the best we can do is choose between two RINO’s.
No sir he did not. He said it was stupid of him to have shot the commercial. He did not say what he said on it was stupid. That is a very important distinction.
I see Palin in the race more every day.
I can’t belive how the LA Times can pull the strings on so many people here on Free Republic. Just amazing what people fall for.
This follow-up book has been under contract for a long time. The original book, Contract with the Earth, was a huge flop for the publisher, although I suspect that it’s seen some more recent sales with Newt’s surge in the polls.
Make no mistake: Newt is all about Newt. He does what’s in his own interest. Shifts with the tides and winds and all that. If he wins the nomination, I don’t know what I’ll do.
His pro-amnesty stance, his pro-global warming comments, his suggestion of replacing Obamacare “with something else” as he calls it, (probably with his own 'Newtcare' - another big government program) aren't the types of things I can get excited about in a GOP candidate.
However, the Republican electorate seems to be craving for a debater in chief, without much regard to what he actually says, as long as he sounds good, is glib and speaks fast, especially if he knows the subjects enough to keep on talking nonstop.
He will probably be the GOP nominee. I don’t think he’ll defeat Obama once the media pounds on him day and night, exposing his baggage.
But even if he wins the election, he can do it without my vote. I will not vote for another liberal wolf wearing conservative sheep clothing, because I won’t be playing the game of: “Oh, I didn’t know. I believed in him and he has disappointed me,” because he hasn’t and he won’t. He doesn’t fool me.
The newspaper even uses weasel words about the alleged book: "Newt Gingrich may be the only one with a book pending on the topic."
This sort of phrasing is a chief trait of the dinosaur media along with the ever-popular, "...source say...". Innuendo and outright lies. The lamestream, drive-by media are [sic] the enemy.
This is precisely why I won’t vote for Gingrich. California embraced all the Global Climate Change rhetoric with AB 32 and SB 375. Now we have the strategic growth council spreading “sustainable development” through every state agency.
We have: the California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for Conserving a Connected California (DFG); the California Interregional Blueprint (CalTrans) and sustainable communities; California’s Climate Adaptation Water Strategy (DWR) using Integrated Regional Water Management Planning; Climate Change, Landuse and Infrastructure (CNRA); Carbon trading (ARB); Health in all policies (SGC)
There are new concepts like ecosystem services, public goods impact fees, social license, polluter pays, and the precautionary principle - all set up to undermine the integrity of private property ownership. The gobal agenda permeates all of California and strangles it is useless socialistic regulations all in the name of Climate Change.
No, I won’t be voting for a globalist like Newt.