Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Poised to Legalize Sodomy and Bestiality in U.S. Military
Cybercast News Service ^ | 12/1/11 | Pete Winn

Posted on 12/01/2011 6:39:58 PM PST by Nachum

The Senate this evening is poised to vote on a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, but also repeals the military ban on sex with animals--or bestiality. On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bestiality; deathofthemilitary; fdrq; homosexualagenda; legalize; poised; senate; sodomy; zoophilia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: MagUSNRET

I just watched a great movie this week from 1950, “The Next Voice You Hear”, about the voice of God broadcasting over worldwide radio. Maybe the only thing that will get us back to a moral world would be God speaking over the TV.


81 posted on 12/01/2011 9:43:31 PM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SiVisPacemParaBellum

That’s hysterical!


82 posted on 12/01/2011 9:44:42 PM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I’m sorry. I can only hope they see the light before it’s too late. There’s nothing worse than family/loved ones becoming antagonists politically, socially or in any way.

Don’t let that discourage you. I just speak my mind on the issue(s) at hand, then distance myself to let it cool. Even the Bible says family won’t always be an ally: “They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.” Luke 12:53


83 posted on 12/01/2011 9:52:14 PM PST by madmaximus (If the GOP choice is Romney,Gingrich,Perry or RINo, then my vote is none of the above.e.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: madmaximus; Strategerist

I didn’t get discouraged, although I was definitely upset, but it was 9 years ago. I just decided to fight harder, in my own little way.

BTW, Strategerist - you haven’t told me whether you think male on male sodomy and animal sodomy should be legalized in the military yet. I’m not going to give up asking you, so please enlighten me on your august viewpoint.


84 posted on 12/01/2011 10:03:17 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yes. There are plenty of ways to fight these battles. I’m constantly reminding my friends and family why the queer agenda will affect them, and why it must be stopped.

I just closed my PayPal account a while ago when I heard of them caving in to the queers. And I made sure I told them exactly why.


85 posted on 12/01/2011 10:10:47 PM PST by madmaximus (If the GOP choice is Romney,Gingrich,Perry or RINO, then my vote is none of the above.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Strategerist
Strategerist makes a valid point. The UCMJ does indeed make heterosexual oral sex illegal for service members. As a minimum, oral sex between husband and wife shouldn't be criminal.

On the other hand, we all know the senators did this in order to approve of homosexual acts, too. They could have removed just the sodomy provision for heterosexuals, but they went further for a reason. This is all part of the DADT repeal deal. They want to make the perverse acceptable if not normal.

We also know where this ultimately leads. Have a spiritual, natural law, or medical/scientific reason for opposing homosexual sex? Better think twice before you express that opinion, because our political betters think homosexuality is a civil rights issue. That, of course, legitimizes using the full weight of federal power to force people to accept and approve of homosexuality, just like they did to stop racial discrimination.

86 posted on 12/01/2011 10:24:35 PM PST by CitizenUSA (What's special about bad? Bad is easy. Anyone can do bad. Aspire to be good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA; Strategerist
His point is not valid, because the entire repeal is to advance the homosexual agenda and I guess the bestiality agenda (?), and if they wanted to de-criminalize opposite sex sodomy they could have tried to do that any time they wanted to.

We also know where this ultimately leads. Have a spiritual, natural law, or medical/scientific reason for opposing homosexual sex? Better think twice before you express that opinion, because our political betters think homosexuality is a civil rights issue.

Not speaking up is why we are in the abyss right now. We better start speaking up soon, and loudly.

87 posted on 12/01/2011 10:31:10 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: madmaximus

At this point the people in positions of public power and responsibility seem to be about 95% of them without a moral compass, courage, or both.


88 posted on 12/01/2011 10:32:15 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Unfortunately,true. It’s going to take what-shall-not-be-spoken-of to undo all this. Of course, it didn’t have to be this way.

Conservatives(not liberaltarians)have been fighting and warning about the moral/social decay for decades now, to little effect.


89 posted on 12/01/2011 10:52:06 PM PST by madmaximus (If the GOP choice is Romney,Gingrich,Perry or RINO, then my vote is none of the above.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: madmaximus

I’m dense and my tooth’s still in pain.

What is it that shall not be spoken of? Hmm... does it have a “C” and a “W”?


90 posted on 12/01/2011 10:55:46 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yup. And number 2.


91 posted on 12/01/2011 11:11:58 PM PST by madmaximus (If the GOP choice is Romney,Gingrich,Perry or RINO, then my vote is none of the above.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Nachum


92 posted on 12/01/2011 11:14:27 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Next the dumb-o-crat senate want to make it legal to molest and rape children.


93 posted on 12/02/2011 3:40:23 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Have we spent so much time in the Middle East that camels are starting to look good to the troops?

The repeal of these restrictions will only open up a can... uh... open a can... uh... never mind.


94 posted on 12/02/2011 4:41:02 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
“(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient
to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall by punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) That the accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with a certain other person or with an animal. (Note: Add either or both of the following elements, if applicable)

(2) That the act was done with a child under the age of 16.

(3) That the act was done by force and without the consent of the other person.

Explanation.

It is unnatural carnal copulation for a person to take into that person’s mouth or anus the sexual organ of another person or of an animal; or to place that person’s sexual organ in the mouth or anus of another person or of an animal; or to have carnal copulation in any opening of the body, except the sexual parts, with another person; or to have carnal copulation with an animal.

Lesser included offenses.

(1) With a child under the age of 16.

(2) Forcible sodomy.

(3) Sodomy.

Maximum punishment.

(1) By force and without consent. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for life without eligibility for parole.

(2) With a child who, at the time of the offense, has attained the age of 12 but is under the age of 16 years. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 20 years.

(3) With a child under the age of 12 years at the time of the offense. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for life without eligibility for parole.

(4) Other cases. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 5 years.

Next Article> Article 126-Arson >

95 posted on 12/02/2011 6:06:53 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I realize it is biased of me, but I tend to think of “sodomy” as a homosexual act. Heterosexual couples have other options. I do think that repealing this section of code is directly related to allowing homosexuals to serve openly.


96 posted on 12/02/2011 6:10:58 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Moral corruption ALWAYS leads to political subversion! An immoral nation devoid of God cannot maintain it’s social integrity.


97 posted on 12/02/2011 9:25:13 AM PST by SQUID (5 ZX V B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

According to the UCMJ, receiving or giving oral sex with a member of the opposite sex is the crime of “sodomy”.

How many military members do you think have broken the law in regards to that specific provision?

I know that back when I served I did as often as reasonably possible.

;)


98 posted on 12/02/2011 9:35:17 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’m so glad I got out. Another protected species in our armed forces, where diversity is a strategic imperative. Know who gets hurt the worst from DADT repeal? Females. There aren’t that many gay guys in the service, but a good chunk of the females are lesbians. I know it affects straight females to some degree now. It’s only going to get worse when the lesies are a protected “minority”.


99 posted on 12/02/2011 11:04:40 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
If the Republican majority House of Representatives passes this disgusting decriminalization of sodomy with humans and animals, the Capitol Building deserves to be burned to the ground.

While I don't always agree with all your posts, you've certainly got something there.

Will child rape be next ? What perversion is too loathsome to be illegal ? Looks like NONE. That a US legislatibe body could pass this is appalling. I thought we sent a message in 2010 ? It seems the folks in Washington are TOTALLY deaf,

100 posted on 12/02/2011 5:12:20 PM PST by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson