Posted on 11/25/2011 4:36:12 PM PST by neverdem
Perfect cartoon. Thanks!
It’s that simple.
Ditto's...
(but I'd like Newt or Cain)
A vote for Romney is a reward to the establishment, big government Republicans. It only encourages them.
I will not reward them with a vote for Romney. Period, end of discussion.
“I was a Goldwater Girl in high school and I would never vote for Paul. I don’t support people who continually make excuses for terrorist leaders, never has seen an enemy of the US and taken them seriously. He may have some good economy policy ideas, however his view on national security leave much to be desired.”
****************************
Could swear i’ve read this b4, right down to the punctuation, but, of course, if yer not a thinker....
Like I say, most folks are, indeed, unacceptable...
Keep memorizing, but be more selective...
;)
Stick with it...
Just Plain Dick
*****
Wow. We have an “eat your peas” candidate. I hate peas.
Romney’s time has passed.
If he had run instead of McCain he might have won.
That was before Obama-Romneycare.
Now he carries that burden, and it is a tremendous burden.
When your time has passed you should step aside.
This article begs the question, ‘Who put Romney #1 if Republicans don’t want him’? The fix is in. Notice how all the attention dropped off of Cain and was put on Romney and Newt, the beltway boys. Very discouraging!
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Romney “loved” the people of Massachusetts so much that they are now being TAXED if they don’t want to buy into his socialized medicine scheme, RomneyCare. I wonder what kind of “love” he has in store for the nation. No thank you.
Yes Romney is all the article says in the lead in... but Romney is also an Establishment RINO who could give a DAMN about what Conservative Americans want... Romney will not aggressively work to repeal obamacare - only if FORCED to do something by a Conservative Republican controlled Congress. Romney will me a wussy about reforming the EPA, Romney will not actively work against bureaucratic efforts to enforce a Cap and Trade Policy - the Congress will have to FORCE him to do it... Romney will only play act at reducing BIG GOVERNMENT... Romney is obamalite...
If you’re for liberty, then you ought to be familiar with the tenth amendment. The people of Massachusetts can CHANGE THEIR STATE LAW ANY TIME THEY WANT. Or, if it SUCKS so bad to live in Massachusetts, they’re free to leave.
You want to focus on one aspect of the REAL difference between Hussein and ALL of the Republican candidates...yet you IGNORE that I freely admit we have a flawed field.
I do not buy the notion that any of our candidates are as bad or worse than Hussein.
I sincerely hope Cain will be able to win the nomination.
The second sentence doesn't follow from the first at all. It might be argued that someone with those particular qualities (straightness, fitness, educated) would make a good President - but no one with any knowledge of the political process can argue those are the qualities that make for a good presidential candidate. The way the Romney-pushers talk you'd think they had an extremely charismatic, likable, and popular politician on their hands. Hardly. He's a straight laced, boring technocrat with perfectly shaped hair - that may be enough to beat a weak incumbent president like Obama, but in any given year, there's nothing especially promising about that type of candidate as a candidate.
It is taken after swallowing a poisonous substance to induce vomiting. Which is what a lot of people will have to take to handle voting for Willard.
Exactly what I've been saying about the pro-RomneyCare, anti- Second Amendment, big government liberal from MA since the first time he ran for President.
He's only singing the "states rights" tune now to make his liberal past sound palatable. He had liberal positions before being governor. He's been on record as being pro-abortion, pro-homosexual rights, and anti-gun long before being sworn in. Having a liberal record just proves it. He went along with it all. Why did he never take a STAND for conservatism? Is that the kind of person we want as President? Someone who'd bend over to liberals/liberalism?
He's running for the highest office of the land, which is at the federal level. If he wants to be a gun grabbing socialist, maybe he should run for governor of some liberal state again. And change parties.
I don't think it's so much to ask that our possible Republican nominee have actual conservative principles.
I can imagine a wimp like Romney as President with a liberal house & senate. They'd get him to go along with ANY liberal position with very little pressure. He'll say "Well, it's what the people want! Who am I to stop it?" Right? He does not have conservative convictions & he won't stand up for US.
I can't believe this is what the Republican party has come to. We can do better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.