Posted on 11/21/2011 11:32:24 AM PST by Fred
I cant understand why Newt Gingrich is getting such a pass on his Freddie Mac consulting. He claims to have been a historian for this outfit? FHLMC needs a historian like the U.S.A. needs a Department of Education, like Europe needs a common currency, like like I dunno, like Michelle Obama needs another $12,000 accessory.
I sputtered about this on last weeks Radio Derb:
Newts trying to ju-jitsu the thing, telling us that his experience as a shill for Freddie Mac gave him valuable insider understanding of governmental affairs. Isnt that what we want in a candidate, valuable insider understanding of governmental affairs? Quote from Newt, on the campaign trail in Iowa Wednesday, quote: It reminds people that I know a great deal about Washington. We just tried four years of amateur ignorance, and it didnt work very well. So having someone who actually knows Washington might be a really good thing.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
‘Freddie Mac’ without an historian is like a fish without a bicycle.
Historical perspective? Institutional memory? Before the computer and before policy & procedure manuals - employees with seniority were valued for their ‘institutional’ memories. IBM cards without the holes.
Newt, did you pay ANY attention over the last fifteen years? Or are you just trying to perform some damage control?
No pass for Newt. I won’t vote for him.
OK, Newt defenders, defend this Romney-grade flip flopping and situational ethics.
DITTOS
I don’t want Newt as POTUS. Yes I understand she was incredibly brave with an incredibles knack for survival against the Aliens, but Ripley had a big hand in that don’t forget. When Hicks said “Why don’t you put her in chaarge?” I don’t think he was taking about POTUS. Plus Newt (aka Rebecca) is still too young for the office.
“Isnt that what we want in a candidate, valuable insider understanding of governmental affairs?”
That’s what I want. Someone who has shown us how to ramrod a balanced budget, help create jobs, know where to cut government jobs, cut welfare, kick ass and take names. You know, useless shit like that. Things they have already demonstrated IN THE OFFICE OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.
Or we could disqualify them for what they have allegedly done OUTSIDE the office they held.
Orrr...we could let someone have a few years of OJT. And hope for change.
Cripes.
Like u were really goning to wink! wink!
u obama boys are good.
How would you know, newbie.
Consider the alternatives.
I think the question few have really failed to consider asking is;
“After conservatives are through destroying all their options as well as chances, who will be left standing?
The answer to that one is; “The one who was most overlooked.” (Romney)
Listen to all the General public pundits, it’s almost unanimous. Even on FOX.
They can't and they won't try. All they will do is flame us that see through the hypocrite.
This is nothing compared to what's coming if the idiot should get the nomination.
John Derbyshire... Isn’t he the pro-aboprt guy who supported Giuliani in ‘08 and is an admirer of Ron Paul?
http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/PoliSci/derbvsramesh.html
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/274681/appalled-paul-john-derbyshire
Well whaddya know, he is! But I’m sure he has no agenda. /sarc
Look at all the Mittwits coming out of the woodpile to hate on Newt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.