Posted on 11/15/2011 10:33:39 AM PST by presidio9
Yes, Newt Gingrich has spiked in the polls. No, he’s not going to be the nominee. I’ve been trying to duck this one because it feels like laying out the obvious, but, briefly, three reasons:
1. The baggage he’s always had — the marital difficulties, the ethics troubles, a whole bunch of deviations from conservative orthodoxy over the years (such as that ad he shot with Nancy Pelosi: “Our country must take action to address climate change”) — just isn’t going to go away. Republican voters don’t have those things in mind at the moment, but no candidate is more vulnerable to attack ads than the former Speaker.
2. Message discipline, lack thereof. It’s impossible to imagine Newt not saying something that hurts him if there’s a microphone in front of his face for a three-week stretch, which is what wouldgoing to happen if the press decides he actually has a chance at winning this thing. We have a couple decades of evidence, including earlier this year, showing that he’s just not able to do it. For whatever it’s worth, I’d add that as I read the polling over the years, Newt’s basic act is unlikely to wear well with voters after extended exposure. People just don’t like the guy.
3. Both of those might be overcome, but this one won’t: it’s highly unlikely that anyone who worked with Newt Gingrich when he was Speaker would want him anywhere near the White House. As detailed in many places, but perhaps most memorably by David Maraniss and Michael Weisskopf in their
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
“All history, want to try the Gettysburg address next.”
Geez, what to do with penetrating insight like that? The point was, you can make mistakes along the path to being a pretty good President. Get an adult to read it to you and explain it.
I was 18 once, I think hormones had more influence on my life decisions than my brain did. Maybe you were different.
If you want to attack Reagan, as newt has in the past, he was out in left field when he canceled the three nuclear power plants we had under construction back then. Cost the tax pay Millions and millions, and millions.
And you will be a noteworthy poster of the assassination materials they will cite. No doubt you’re proud, hypocrit.
Let’s see:
Newt has too much baggage.
Ron Paul is a libertarian nut.
Cain is too politically inexperienced and ‘handles things badly.’
Perry is an open borders dunce.
Bachmann’s headaches have turned her crazy.
Santorum is a bore with no charisma.
Huntsman. Wait, who?
Romney is a liberal RINO that no one will support in the general election.
I guess I will have to vote for Obama.
Why is he a RINO?? He’s the best candidate.
Kinda leaving out the second marriage and the affair with Callista there in your little essay. Newt leading the charge against Clinton while banging a woman 23 years his junior... yeah, he has some good ethics there.
Newt is yesterdays dirty underwear. Best to get rid of it as can’t be cleaned up and will never do anything but stink.
And, yes, Newt has said that he regrets doing it. He was also one of the loudest voices against Kyoto.
Indeed.
At first, the left did everything they could to destroy Sarah Palin, because she was so popular and powerful. IMNSHO, what did her in was that heinous accusation that she had sex with a sports figure years ago, before she was married to Todd. I don’t believe this ever happened, but the mere statement of it was over the line. Right after that, Sarah said she would not run, and I totally respect her decision.
Next came Michelle Bachmann. The left had nothing to go on, so they played the angle that she was a ditz and suffers from migraines. They also threw ridiculous, irrelevant questions at her about Biblical Marriage, which she answered sincerely according to her faith. Michelle is hanging in there, but by a thread.
The next person to rise in the Polls was Herman Cain; a real threat to obama, because it would disarm obama’s race card forever. The left incorrectly assumed that Conservatives are racist, so they played the old “Black man chasing blond women” routine. So far it hasn’t knocked Herman Down, but I do believe it has shook him up a little, as his usual ebullience has faded somewhat, as well as his big lead in the polls. If the left succeeds in destroying this man like it did with Sarah and Michelle, I will consider it devastating for our nation.
Next in line is Newt, since his numbers are on the rise. Because of the fact that Newt has been a major political figure for many years, he DOES have a lot of baggage. Even if he has totally repented of his political and moral lapses, you KNOW the left is going to use them to shoot him down.
Gov. Perry is somebody I supported in the very beginning, but he lost me with the business about In-State Tuition for illegals. Especially when he called conservatives “heartless”. That being said, I would STILL vote for him against obama.
The ONLY candidate who has not been attacked by the left is Mitt Romney. Why IS that, I wonder? Could it be that they think that obama could easily beat him, or that a Romney Administration would allow the left to continue in its nefarious degradation of Our Beloved Nation?
For The record, I am for Herman Cain right now. I will vote against obama no matter what, but my one vote will not defeat this evil regime. It is incumbent upon ALL Conservatives of good conscience to resist the lies of the enemy, no matter how bizarre they may seem, or how much they hammer away at us. Vote for whom you will in the primaries, stop demonizing the other Republican candidates, and stand together! WE ARE FREEPERS, DAMMIT!
/rant off
Thanks for posting this thread, Presidio9.
Please name me one candidate for President who has not been called a RINO on this site. Maybe you could name one elected official who has not been labeled a RINO.
In his heart, Newt loves government. His first instinct is not “Why involve the government?”
His mind is conservative, except when it wanders after his heart...
Agree with you both. This “RINO” tag—so frequently and mindlessly thrown around (about as precise as one of those big slingshots at baseball games that shoots T-shirts into the stands and expects it to go right where aimed) is more than just OLD.
It simply accomplishes nothing constructive—is just throwing small rocks at a stone fortress. No mind is changed either way, and all we have is frustration, fatigue, and hostility.
Wouldn’t we all enjoy this site more if we were able to find more wheat and less chaff? My thinking, anyway.
“If you want to attack Reagan, as newt has in the past, he was out in left field when he canceled the three nuclear power plants we had under construction back then. Cost the tax pay Millions and millions, and millions.”
What a maroon...it’s not an attack, it’s an example of course correction. Not much on comprehension, eh?
Either Cain/Gingrich or Gingrich/Cain work for me ... far better than Obama/Biden or Obama/Clinton.
Romney plus anyone doesn’t work for me. Romney is a one man focus group, every possible position on everything all rolled into one person.
If we have to choose between Romney and Newt, Newt will win.
Amen.
Cigar, Intern, Oval Office, Desk, Sink = standard set
Wife, Coattail, Tammy Wynette = Stand by your man
End of discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.