Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fifth Cain woman says she’s not an ‘accuser’
The Washington Times ^ | 11/9/2011 | David Eldridge

Posted on 11/10/2011 11:04:21 AM PST by ferrgus

Donna Donella, one of the five women caught up in the charges of sexual harassment being leveled against Herman Cain, said Wednesday she is not an “accuser.”

“I take issue with being labeled in the media as 'Accuser No. 5,' ” she said in an interview with The Washington Times-affiliated “America's Morning News” radio program. “I want to make it very clear that Herman Cain never sexually harassed me, I’ve never accused Herman Cain of sexually harassing me. The only reason that I came forward is because I saw behavior, the one day that I met him … that was consistent with the pattern of his behavior described by his four actual accusers.”

“I can’t put a finger on it, but as most women will tell you, you kind of have a sense when men are on the up and up and when there are men who may not be. I had that feeling and so did my colleague, and that’s why she jumped in and said, ‘Oh, let’s all go to dinner.’ “

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cain; cainscandals; caintrain; donnadonella; election; elections; fraud; hermanator; hermancain; mediabias; obama; primary; republican; sexualharassment; smearcampaign; woman5
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: poobear

Good for you, dear lady. LOL


81 posted on 11/10/2011 12:52:07 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~... Newt/Cain 2012..."Save a pretzel for the gas jets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

you’re right
that’s what it was imo


82 posted on 11/10/2011 12:57:41 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ferrgus
Sorry Donna. When you opened your mouth and told your little story about Cain asking for you to arrange a dinner with someone to further elaborate on the answers to her questions, you became an accuser. You accused him of "funny" behavior. Just because Rush and those with functioning brains are now ridiculing you for your "feeling", doesn't mean you get to back peddle. You're in it up to your neck, sweetie. Enjoy your 15 minutes of ridicule.

BTW, I wish Cain would have ordered 3 $800 bites of wine before "sticking" you with the bill.

83 posted on 11/10/2011 12:59:53 PM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma
Some men flirt. Sometimes we like it and sometimes we don’t. Grow up, little girls.

Or as my sister (strong Southern woman) used to say: "Time to put on your big girl panties".

84 posted on 11/10/2011 1:01:13 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

Make sure you tell someone now, how uncomfortable this incident made you, just in case the waitress becomes famous 14 years from now ;-)


85 posted on 11/10/2011 1:02:41 PM PST by 07Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; cuban leaf

A $400 bottle of wine reminds me of the emperor’s new clothes.

Let’s not forget no one has validated the statement regarding 2 bottles of expensive wine.

Course if Cain really did order these bottles and stick them w/ the bill then I’d guess maybe he got wind of why the group joined him, what they really thought of him and had a little payback of his own sticking whoever it was w/ a rather large dinner tab.

Personally I don’t believe any of this until Herman chimes in or one of those named can re-produce the dinner tab.


86 posted on 11/10/2011 1:03:07 PM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
And if it’s true, is it even relevant. Do we really need to know about every time he left skid marks in his underwear too?

Exactly. Who cares.

87 posted on 11/10/2011 1:10:13 PM PST by BagCamAddict (If Perry had been asked about the Cain 999 plan, he would have said: 9, 9, .......what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Hey, I shook hands with Clinton while on a White House tour, between the Grand Jury testimony and the impeachment hearings. Perhaps, I could still sue, because, you know, I just had that feeling.


88 posted on 11/10/2011 1:23:20 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Barrak has now won the contest. He is even worse than Jimmah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Would not flame you, because you speak the truth. As a woman in business, I have seen a lot, but never anything I couldn’t handle. Remember going to one party where I got three propositions, and that is where it ended. Doubt if any of these men remembered what they said by the next day.


89 posted on 11/10/2011 1:27:23 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Barrak has now won the contest. He is even worse than Jimmah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Yeah well, ... I’ve deleted everything I wanted. Let’s just say he comes home and leaves happy ;D!

There is someone out there for everyone. Thank G-d I met mine. He’s the most wonderful man!

I will leave this world knowing I was loved. What else is there, really?


90 posted on 11/10/2011 1:30:02 PM PST by poobear (Facts, the TURD in the punchbowl of Liberal thought!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Fred

“The funny feeling she is getting right about now is called Lin Wood.”

I agree. Bialek’s fiance did an interview on local Chicago news last night, “correcting” the record. He said Sharon moved out in February when they broke off their engagement. He is not her fiance, they are still friends trying to work things out. He made a point of saying he is in no way financially tied to Bialek, that he does not pay her bills. A slander lawsuit would cost him some $$.....I figured he may have heard from Lin Wood.


91 posted on 11/10/2011 1:33:35 PM PST by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: poobear

You sound exactly like my bride of over 40 years.


92 posted on 11/10/2011 1:34:19 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~... Newt/Cain 2012..."Save a pretzel for the gas jets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

;D! You know what to do.


93 posted on 11/10/2011 2:00:16 PM PST by poobear (Facts, the TURD in the punchbowl of Liberal thought!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ferrgus

I’m glad she’s come out to clarify that his is not a “fifth accuser” because the media has overplayed the numbers here. It’s a circus.


94 posted on 11/10/2011 2:00:28 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fu-fu2

That’s funny. I found I immediately noticed that during her press conference on Monday that she referred to her “boyfriend” but the MSM stories referred to him as her “fiance” in an obvious attempt to make her/them appear stable.


95 posted on 11/10/2011 3:10:01 PM PST by Yooper4Life (They all lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
My comment was about "flirting" in the abstract not about what Cain was accused of doing to Bialek.

If by "flirting in the abstract" you mean harmless, non-sexual joking around, I have no problem with that. But in the alleged incident, Cain supposedly was trying to arrange a dinner date with one young woman, and then another, whom he didn't know. Hopefully the charge turns out to be false, but my point was that many (myself included) would consider it inappropriate behavior for a married man.

The New Testament says: "Avoid even the appearance of evil." I wonder what Freeper wives feel about finding out about their husband in such circumstances.

96 posted on 11/10/2011 3:48:23 PM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
Cain said he is innocent of inappropriate advances. His lawyer, L. Lin Wood, was satisfied about that claim...and he is the best at ferreting out the truth before deciding to represent a client.

I think you can rest assured. But like you, I would be devastated by proof that Cain is lying.

I put my faith in Lin Wood...and Herman Cain.

97 posted on 11/10/2011 4:33:04 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Go Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
BTW...thx for being an honorable person and clarifying your comment. Many freepers toss out stupid cuts and never consider that they may be wrong.

You are a perhaps a gentleman after all.

98 posted on 11/10/2011 4:37:05 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Go Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
Another BTW, I completely agree with your point of using Scripture as a rule for living. Cain is an associate pastor of his church and a real evangelical.

We are all human...but Herman said, in this case, he is innocent.

If he is lying...he is dead. But if he is telling the truth (I think he is)...he has risen above these devious attacks...and these devious attackers.

99 posted on 11/10/2011 4:47:27 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Go Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Thank you for your kind response. I sincerely hope the charges are, as you put it, a devious attack. I certainly wouldn't put it past our opponents to conspire to derail his candidacy.

I must say, however, that there is often truth to the adage "where there's smoke, there's fire." I actually would not be "devastated" to learn that there was some truth behind the accusations, because I learned long ago not to trust any man (or woman). We can place varying degrees of confidence in people - and hopefully a great deal of confidence in some - but God is the only One worthy of our complete trust. Given our fallen nature, sooner or later everyone will disappoint us in some way. Thus we should not be surprised to discover that someone we looked up to was not the example we thought they were.

As I mentioned in earlier posts, I was concerned - IF it was true (and that's a big IF) that a married man "on the road" would look for a single woman to keep him company (even at a dinner table). I remember Billy Graham saying long ago that he made it a point never to be alone with a woman. Similarly, I remember my childhood pastor, a godly man, saying that he never allowed himself to be alone in his office with a woman; the door would always be cracked & the secretary next door. Hopefully she could keep a confidence!

I am no prude and far from what I should be as a Christian, but I've been around long enough to realize the dangers of men & women together in the workplace. I worked for many years in an office setting, and I cannot remember a single time when I even went out for lunch with a female co-worker alone. It just never occurred to me, and I knew that it would hurt my wife.

So, I must say that if someone is not in the practice of guarding himself in this way, it tells me a lot about his character (again, innocent until proven guilty!) All the best.

100 posted on 11/10/2011 7:10:57 PM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson