Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
Thank you for your kind response. I sincerely hope the charges are, as you put it, a devious attack. I certainly wouldn't put it past our opponents to conspire to derail his candidacy.

I must say, however, that there is often truth to the adage "where there's smoke, there's fire." I actually would not be "devastated" to learn that there was some truth behind the accusations, because I learned long ago not to trust any man (or woman). We can place varying degrees of confidence in people - and hopefully a great deal of confidence in some - but God is the only One worthy of our complete trust. Given our fallen nature, sooner or later everyone will disappoint us in some way. Thus we should not be surprised to discover that someone we looked up to was not the example we thought they were.

As I mentioned in earlier posts, I was concerned - IF it was true (and that's a big IF) that a married man "on the road" would look for a single woman to keep him company (even at a dinner table). I remember Billy Graham saying long ago that he made it a point never to be alone with a woman. Similarly, I remember my childhood pastor, a godly man, saying that he never allowed himself to be alone in his office with a woman; the door would always be cracked & the secretary next door. Hopefully she could keep a confidence!

I am no prude and far from what I should be as a Christian, but I've been around long enough to realize the dangers of men & women together in the workplace. I worked for many years in an office setting, and I cannot remember a single time when I even went out for lunch with a female co-worker alone. It just never occurred to me, and I knew that it would hurt my wife.

So, I must say that if someone is not in the practice of guarding himself in this way, it tells me a lot about his character (again, innocent until proven guilty!) All the best.

100 posted on 11/10/2011 7:10:57 PM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: tjd1454
tjd1454 said: "I sincerely hope the charges are, as you put it, a devious attack."

I can't even describe how it makes me FEEL to consider the attacks against Cain while considering the history of Teddy Kennedy. There is something so very wrong with the situation.

I can only repeat my advice to cut off all support to the liberal media. Stop subscribing to your local liberal rag. Tune out completely the broadcast networks. If you don't do this, then you are paying the salaries of those who are trying to destroy us.

101 posted on 11/10/2011 8:26:09 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: tjd1454; RoosterRedux
In the incident where, after a speech, Herman goes to dinner and invites a female from the audience who proposed an excellent question for discussion, I question why this was even considered to be 'devious'?

Is this not the norm, anyway? That the guest speaker may invite audience members to dinner, or someone from the press?

Don't expect me to also believe that a GUEST SPEAKER of the NRA goes to dinner, and will have any kind of privacy at the table, such as one might if you were an unknown visiting businessman.

103 posted on 11/12/2011 10:55:06 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson