Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder to call for tighter gun control in Fast & Furious testimony tomorrow
Hot Air ^ | 11/7/11 | Allahpundit

Posted on 11/07/2011 7:14:30 PM PST by Nachum

Why not? We pay for having a terrible federal government every day. Why should this be any different just because it involves lost rights instead of lost money?

Seriously, though, having Obama’s AG mumble about more gun regulation in front of a mic will accomplish two things. One: It’s bound to worry all sorts of swing-state gun owners in Pennsylvania and Ohio once word of his testimony gets around, which is all to the good for election day next year. Two: The more gun owners perk up about Holder’s testimony, the more public interest there’s bound to be in Fast & Furious. And hey — there actually is room for a smart new gun law here if Congress is willing to take it up. I call it the “DOJ Shouldn’t Walk Guns to Psychotic Mexican Drug Cartels Act of 2011.” The text reads, in full, “The DOJ shouldn’t walk guns to psychotic Mexican drug cartels.”

I’m thinking that would be a party-line vote in the House.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 65grendel; atf; banglist; bhofascism; bloodoftyrants; castaway; cia; clinton; control; corruption; crushdoj; cwii; dea; democrats; dhs; doj; dojisajoke; donttreadonme; fastandfurious; fbi; flamingleaddeath; fraud; guncontrol; gunrunner; gunwalker; hillary; hillaryclinton; holder; ice; livefreeordie; lping; miniguns4all; molonlabe; obama; shallnotbeinfringed; statedept; tighter; time2partyagain; treeofliberty; truthmatters0; tyranny; willnotbeinfringed; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Nachum

This is what you get when you deal with the corrupt.


21 posted on 11/07/2011 7:40:09 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee; LucyT; vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; FreedomPoster; ...
Can YOU say C H U T Z P A H??? I KNEW you could!


JUST DO IT!

22 posted on 11/07/2011 7:40:43 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

YOu will not hear democrat lawmakers say anything about tighter gun control laws, it is a lossing issue for them that’s why they do not bring it up.


23 posted on 11/07/2011 7:40:53 PM PST by stockpirate (Why are homosexuals so hetrophobic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

With Fox leaking the gnarly details every now and then, that’s a secret harder for the msm to keep.


24 posted on 11/07/2011 7:41:15 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

All the Repubs need to do is yell “WHY THE HELL SHOULD WE CONTROL GUNS FOR LEGAL RESIDENTS IF YOU ARE ISSUING THEM TO CRIMINALS!”


25 posted on 11/07/2011 7:42:13 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Time to get this from Colt. 1877 Bulldog Gatling Gun in 45/70:

http://www.coltsmfg.com/Catalog/SpecialEditions/1877BulldogGatlingGun.aspx


26 posted on 11/07/2011 7:42:17 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Eric Holder needs to spend the next 10-20 years sitting in a high security cell block.


27 posted on 11/07/2011 7:42:55 PM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Congress won’t touch a gun control bill with a ten foot pole, and Obama will be way over his head in some sort of a Presidential directive especially with this scandal. So this will do only a few possible things, all of which is good; Gun sales will again skyrocket and Obama’s fate as a one term President will be assured, and the true purpose behind the gunrunner scandal will be brought out front and center. Lastly the oath to “uphold and defend” the Constitution will be brought into question with Holder and Obama himself, and someone could go to jail as a result. In comparison, Watergate was just a coverup of a two bit robbery, and coverup is the least of this administration’s crimes.


28 posted on 11/07/2011 7:43:48 PM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More gun control is needed .. who would have thunk it ..

Amazing ... did ANYONE not see this coming???


29 posted on 11/07/2011 7:45:35 PM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectronVolt
I agree with him if he means that we need tighter gun control on corrupt attorneys general so that they can’t so easily sell weapons to drug lords.

That would delight him. He would then be able to say that he can't be prosecuted for F&F because the laws preventing it were passed after the fact.

30 posted on 11/07/2011 7:50:31 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

cool


31 posted on 11/07/2011 7:54:39 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I agree with your congressman. Holder is gone he just does not know it yet. Too bad they will probably not indict him as he belongs in Leavenworth with Barry, Barney, Frank and Ben.


32 posted on 11/07/2011 8:00:44 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

OMG. They are the criminals. We are not. Simple. I dont know how much mr. law abider can stand.


33 posted on 11/07/2011 8:16:29 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Holder and his cohorts give guns to criminals in an attempt to take guns from law abiding citizens? Crazy plan. Another four years of O and it might just work.


34 posted on 11/07/2011 8:19:34 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Tighter grip is tighter control..


35 posted on 11/07/2011 8:31:47 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

With Barrack Obama.... They can spend 20 years tossing each others salad.....


36 posted on 11/07/2011 9:06:36 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Wildbill22

“Can YOU say C H U T Z P A H??? I KNEW you could!”

Double-down-—Isn’t that their way?...

Any bets that prominent GOPs will join the bandwagon?

I would like to think post 28’s analysis will rule the day.


37 posted on 11/07/2011 9:32:33 PM PST by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

bttt WITH WHAT YOU SAID!!! We need more control OVER government. Government should have no more control over guns. Period. They are OURS.

This was a set up. Holder sent guns to criminal in Mexico so they could JUSTIFY more gun control. Mark my words.

FUBO


38 posted on 11/07/2011 9:57:02 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: struggle

“All the Repubs need to do is yell “WHY THE HELL SHOULD WE CONTROL GUNS FOR LEGAL RESIDENTS IF YOU ARE ISSUING THEM TO CRIMINALS!””

That statement makes too much sense-—It will never fly. In a sane world-—even in a sane Repub world-—your statement would be the “talking point” on this topic..........BUT, Repubs don’t DO talking points.

They are too out of touch and/or complicit.


39 posted on 11/07/2011 10:09:02 PM PST by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thouworm; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
40 posted on 11/07/2011 10:31:56 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson