"Since Oct 11, 2011"
Sniff.
Posted on 11/07/2011 12:18:58 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Who can turn down $5M+ put in an offshore bank account is someone else’s name to lie about sexual advancements made by Herman Cain?
Sharon Bialek, a Chicago Liberal and possible agent of the Obama campaign, has been accused of making false accusations against Herman Cain for sexual harassment.
But Sharon Cain’s case may begin becoming unglued when a private investigator, who has requested to remain anonymous until such a time when she will present empirical evidence proving that Bialek is a paid liar set up by Democrat operatives to destroy Cain campaign. The source also confirms that agents of eh Democrat party also plan to launch the same against Romney.
Herman Cain’s campaign sent out the following statement:
Herman Cain’s campaign just e-mailed us a statement.
"Just as the country finally begins to refocus on our crippling $15 trillion national debt and the unacceptably high unemployment rate, now activist celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred is bringing forth more false accusations against the character of Republican front-runner Herman Cain.
All allegations of harassment against Mr. Cain are completely false. Mr. Cain has never harassed anyone.
Fortunately the American people will not allow Mr. Cain’s bold “9-9-9 Plan”, clear foreign policy vision and plans for energy independence to be overshadowed by these bogus attacks"
A fourth woman said Monday that presidential candidate Herman Cain engaged in sexually inappropriate behavior with her more than decade ago, though Cain was not her supervisor at the time.
Sharon Bialek, is the first woman to publicly accuse Cain of inappropriate behavior, Bialek is claiming that Cain made sexual advances towards her in 1997, claiming he put his hand under her skirt and pushed her head toward his crotch after a they had dinner together. Bialek claimed also that Cain backed away after she asked him to stop.
Bialek acted out her scene today at a press conference trying to muster up her best dramatic performance saying “I want you to come clean, Mr. Cain,” which wasn’t very convincing as she appeared in a New York City press conference at the Friars Club with her Celebrity attorney, Gloria Allred, who ONLY takes these kinds of cases. Gloria is a vulture and if I through a dress on and claimed any Conservative or Republican made a sexual advance or abusive gesture towards me, I could get her to represent me pro bono. Allred is laughingly known for her sly media savvy and for preying on women who have she convinced to launch legal suits against the rich and powerful. Especially if these rich and powerful are NOT Liberals or Democrats. I wonder why Allred didnt chase down the massage therapist who claimed Al Gore made sexual advancements.
Bialek does not plan to sell her story or file a lawsuit against the Republican candidate for the White House. She said she was let go from the National Restaurant Association’s Educational Foundation in the summer of 1997 and asked to meet him for coffee a month or so later in Washington, to ask for his assistance with her job search.
She said she booked herself a room at a hotel two blocks from the White House and when she checked in, it was upgraded to a suite by Cain. They went to dinner at an Italian restaurant and after dinner Cain made unwanted advances toward Bialek in the car.
When she asked what he was doing, she said he responded by rhetorically asking her: “You want a job, right?”
She said she made it clear she was not interested and Cain backed off.
Yeah...that’s her. All her boyfriends on Facebook look like mobsters.
I think this is a shakedown.
Maybe he removed his hand from her thigh so he could use that hand to move her head to the proper position? Just saying.
Somehow I bet she works a lot cheaper than $5M.
Allegations are not evidence, no matter how many.
Sniff.
Did the writer here pass fifth grade English?
See my post 149 from the same thread, please.
My husband always says we lived in the best of times. We could play outside dawn to dark—our parents never had to worry. Every Saturday I’d take a bus into town—we lived in the country—my best friend would be waiting—we’d go to a double feature movie and have ice cream afterwards. We couldn’t afford the most expensive sundaes—$.30!!!!
I was 9 1/2 first time my parents left me home at night to babysit my 5 year old brother and 6 month old sister. I worried Germans were parachuting nearby! The volunteer fireman were cooking a spaghetti dinner for their wives. I kept calling asking when they were coming home—I was a bit scared. My mother told me to turn on the radio and bring the dog inside. It worked! She was so wise! She was only 18 years older than me! When they came home I had 3 pies I’d baked sitting on the table. Just a radio, no tv, party-line phone—how did we survive?? :)
Hah...when you put it like THAT...:)
Howdy stranger!!!!.....I have been thinking about you lately, knowing your connection to Cain.
Obviously Cain is a threat. So a character assassination is just as good to the dems as a physical one, and a whole lot less messy.
I remember Cain’s integrity from years gone by.
not only that, if Cain were to win, how could all the conservatives be then racists for not voting for the WON??
The best part of being a kid when we were is that we were strangers to the word “worry”. Except for the news on the radio, or the newsreel before the movie in the theatre, we weren’t burdened with the cares of adulthood. Our parents cherished our childhoods, and our growing-up days were sweet innocence. The only concerns I remember were that the Nazis might come goose-stepping down our street, and of having to stay in our own yards to avoid being exposed to infantile paralysis when it appeared in the town.
The joy of life was that we neither knew, saw, nor heard of life’s mysteries or trials until we had a need to know.
Why would “stimulus package” even be mentioned in 1997?
nail meet hammer, head
DING, DING, we have a winner!!!!!
`_________until we had a need to know.’
Ditto to what you both said.
Remarkable what Goldwater Chick did at 9 and a half.
Carefree childhoods - you bet.
Similarities: I am 16 years younger than my mom, and Dad was from Scotland!
Don’t think I claim anything Wallace, however!
Well, F R E E D O M !
I was a child when I heard we had soldier (Italian?) prisoners of war (WWII) in my town on Long Island. That was scary.
And remarkable, because my parents spoke very little about anything in front of my brother and I.
They must have kept it until their times alone.
And scary having air raid drills at night, watching my dad leave the house in his role as an air raid warden. Turning off lights, covering all windows.
And the anti-radiation drills by the time I was in high school.
Now, kids back then didn’t ask many questions of their parents - okay, I didn’t mine - so I never knew the whole truth about those prisoners - still don’t.
As an adult I had forgotten all about it, so didn’t ask!
(I’ll Google it)!
Adults today say far too much around the kids - good and bad - see it ALL the time.
The stuff with which they burden their kids. Shameful.
This contributes to a less-than-carefree childhood.
Off-handed opinions about people their kids have to face, or interact with their kids.
Parents need to keep some opinions between themselves - wait until they’re alone.
No excuses!
Tainted history?
The first two involved some sort of unspecified "sexual harrassment" which could be nothing more than "get me a cup of coffee would you honey", and either a settlement or severance package.
The last three cases are nothing more than hearsay, someone reporting something that supposedly happened 12-20 years ago. This would get thrown out of court in nano second, to simply make an accusation from 12-20 years ago. So hearsay charges now indicate a "tainted history". I don't think so.
It's possible, just possible, that surrogates for 0dumb0 are doing everything they can to drudge up more women who are "willing" to step forward and make some other hearsay charge against Cain. The main thing they are trying to do is to clear the slate clean for 0dumb0 by discrediting anyone who appears to be a threat to the RAT bastard commie pig 0dumb0.
If he upgraded her room to a suite, why did he try to screw her in the car? Would he not just ask to come to her room? Would he need to grab her head to get the point across? No, this makes no sense. This woman’s story precludes the possibility of any proof. And no lawsuit means no liability for slander. This does not add up. Anyone could say this about anyone.
the accuser isn’t engaged ..she’s married so she is not truthful!
that’s what I pointed out in the duke case... that tiny house had a tiny bathroom... impossible for the event to have occured everyone would have heard her too...
people don’t think.
No, in reality it looks like a few women have alleged that over a decade ago Cain made some non-sexual comment that made them FEEL uncomfortable because of their own dirty minds. Now, a serial litigator and financial failure is claiming that he made a sexual advance toward her over a decade ago. So far there is nothing even close to concrete that would even suggest that Cain tried to trade sexual favors for jobs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.