Posted on 11/07/2011 10:55:06 AM PST by reegs
For those interested in watching the press conference live.
Sounds like she may have gone on to advanced studies from there.
Sheesh. Forget Newt, already!! We need to be circling the wagons and telling the media and public, “NOT AGAIN! NOT *EVER* AGAIN!!”
Bringing up everyone else’s dirty laundry is just a circular firing squad.
With all the stimulus money Obama and the Dems have stashed away, they will indeed have women pouring in from all angles.
Ultimately, Obama is going to destroy any opposition by whatever means necessary. Ergo, the Right had better prepare for all-out war.
So today's charade was opened up with a lie. Nice. Yet they expect us to believe the rest of it? I don't think so.
Yeah, no wonder Holder wants FOIA changed.
So many kids lost their innocence because of the details of Bill Clinton's actual assault of an intern in the papers and on TV. Oral sex, semen stains, phallic cigars - it was awful.
My 11 year old daughter has become a fan of Herman Cain because she pays attention and knows that I like him. She wanted me to explain to her what people were saying about him on the news this morning.
I saw a little more of her innocence fade away. She was already heartbroken by all of the terrible attacks on her hero Sarah Palin.
The copy/paste up-thread indicates that her voter registration is inactive. If so, she's not a registered anything.
Sorry, but you declaring it bunk doesn’t make it so. You don’t want to believe her, and that’s fine, but proving she is lying is not simply you saying so.
Cain has completely mishandled this situation from the get go if all of this is nothing more than bogus bs.
So far, its a he said she said, and its a he said/she said in the context of a guy who’s had payments go out to at least one woman to keep her quiet... That doesn’t look good, and the so called “air tight” declarations of bunk by you and others don’t remotely ring true.
If this is a witch hunt, it will hopefully be shown to be quickly, but the so called proof and declarations so far on this thread are woefully inadequate for even fellow conservatives, they sure aren’t going to be for the general electorate.
No degree?
Accoding to Michelle Malkin it’s a different dude.
She said that she had a brief conversation recently with him where she asked him if he remembered her, to which he replied that he did.
Is that the truth? Does he know her?
Great find!!! Bump!
If it is true you shouldn’t have to read it. It should just be natural. When a statement is read it is not believable!
2009-M5-000279 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 02/13/2009
2008-M6-003386 DAVIS WAYMON & CLA HARROLD ROGUAYYAH 07/30/2008
2008-M5-001007 STERLING ESTATES HARTLEY GORDON 06/05/2008
2006-M1-176955 MRC RECEIVABLES CO HARTLEY SHARON 10/02/2006
2006-M5-001770 STERLING ESTATES HARTLEY GORDON W 09/25/2006
2006-M1-167313 CAPITAL ONE BANK HARTLEY SHARON R 09/01/2006
2005-M1-172026 ASSET ACCEPTANCE HARTLEY SHARON 10/13/2005
2005-M5-000835 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 05/05/2005
2004-M1-175144 ASSET ACCEPTANCE HARTLEY SHARON 11/09/2004
2004-M5-000302 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 02/18/2004
2002-M1-147913 UNIFUND CCR PARTNE HARTLEY SHARON 08/09/2002
1994-M1-171427 WELLINGTON KENNETH HARTLEY SHARON 12/05/1994
1994-M2-001454 WILMETTE REAL EST HARTLEY JAMES 05/18/1994
1994-M1-712527 WELLINGTON ARMS AP HARTLEY SHARON 05/03/1994
Sharon Hartley (alias?)
“I thought she looked like a fairly fat woman. High mileage, her best days are behind her. Scrap heap tramp.”
She reminds me of the countess character played by Jennifer Coolidge in the movie Best in Show.
Let me ask you this, why do you think you need to be a party to what goes on in the bedroom between two consenting adults?
Too bad you aren’t using the same energy to vet Cain. Just sayin’
Hello Teddymittlover, I wondered when you would show up. What’s the game plan from Mittens today? Has the home office sent you their talking points yet? Or are you just going to wing it by insinuating this whole lie is somehow true? So like your master rat Willard. Perhaps you’re going to claim you support Perry and Cain again? What’s one more lie amongst the multitude?
I thought thought the very same thing when I read “stimulus package”. Did she really use that phrase? It definitely was not in use 15 years ago. These are the sorts of “tells” that I like to look for when confronted with a possible LIAR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.