Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation," Obama's counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, wrote in a letter to the top Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce committee.

Committee chairman Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich, blasted the White House response

1 posted on 11/04/2011 7:01:37 PM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Baynative

Why don’t they subpoena him for his college records, who paid for his University tuition, his Masters Thesis. I bet the guy has something he is trying to cover up, otherwise he would cooperate.


2 posted on 11/04/2011 7:03:29 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Something to hide.

This is getting good.


3 posted on 11/04/2011 7:03:54 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

The Solution to the problem!

> http://youtu.be/lNmfr_mYvK0
>
> ps turn up volume


4 posted on 11/04/2011 7:04:13 PM PDT by hapnHal (hapnHal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

arrogant POS


5 posted on 11/04/2011 7:05:27 PM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Well, now. We have us a little Constitution crisis, now don’t we?


6 posted on 11/04/2011 7:05:41 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Looking For Donors


Click The Pic

Are You One?

7 posted on 11/04/2011 7:06:30 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

US Title 28- Rule 45-e

(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45 (c)(3)(A)(ii).


8 posted on 11/04/2011 7:16:44 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Throw them in jail for contempt!


9 posted on 11/04/2011 7:16:44 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Can that arrogant *** be hauled outta 1600 in handcuffs NOW?!

Defying a subpoena is an arrestable offense to the rest of us!


13 posted on 11/04/2011 7:21:04 PM PDT by Don W (You can forget what you do for a living when your knees are in the breeze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

” - - - a subpoena— is a significant intrusion on Executive Branch interests - - “

HEY! YEAH YOU, Kathryn Ruemmler, just what are those “interests” of Obama’s?

How much stock did Obama buy in Solyndra?

Was Obama promised a seat on the board when he was through shafting the American tax payer?


14 posted on 11/04/2011 7:22:53 PM PDT by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative
"I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation,"

She can conclude whatever she wants to, if it is a legitimate subpoena and they refuse to comply, use the full authority of the congress to make them comply.

This is a direct challenge to the oversight authority of the congress and if they don't force compliance then they won't have any authority and might as well go home.

15 posted on 11/04/2011 7:24:21 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Democrats have no superego.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

17 posted on 11/04/2011 7:37:04 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative
An abdominal/gastro deficiency
20 posted on 11/04/2011 8:12:05 PM PDT by bksanders (Get a pair, Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

What are Republicans going to do about it? Nothing. Obama and the Dems know they can do whatever they want to do.


23 posted on 11/04/2011 8:38:31 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Well, la te da! Aren’t we just too high and mighty up there in the white hut. Rules are just for the little people.


27 posted on 11/04/2011 9:45:54 PM PDT by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative
"I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation," Obama's counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, wrote in a letter to the top Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce committee.

Conclude whatever you want, sweetheart, but unless there is a case to be made (and there doesn't appear to be) for Executive Privilege, my understanding is that the President has no right to withhold the subpoenaed documents.

Congress has subpoena power, plain and simple, and the President can ultimately be compelled to produce the requested information.

Congress should immediately take President 0bama to the Supreme Court for a Constitutional bitch slap, if necessary.

As someone else noted, this is getting good.

I really don't know who this clown in the White House thinks he is, but he is about to find out that his powers are indeed still limited by the Constitution.

If he doesn't wake up, they should impeach his Tyrannical ass...

29 posted on 11/04/2011 10:01:07 PM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

any way to throw some of these lesser folks in the WH in jail and let the first denier see his own people stewing while he is in contempt?


34 posted on 11/05/2011 10:09:44 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative; All

Very interesting. Thanks for the post/ping. Thanks to every poster.


36 posted on 11/05/2011 3:49:02 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson