Posted on 10/21/2011 8:51:57 AM PDT by Marie
It's time to stop projecting and guessing about what Cain wants to do and why. Here it is, in his own words.
It's a PDF. I don't know how to post it here.
http://www.hermancain.com/wp-content/themes/hc/images/HC-OppZone-MI-WebPDF-v1.pdf
CAIN’S VISION for Opportunity Zones
• Renew distressed inner cities by reversing counter productive incentives and bureaucratic micromanagement by re-introducing market based entrepreneurship.
• Create the most productive environment, rather than trying to control outcomes.
• Understand there is no “one size fits all” approach and leave the highest degree of freedom to the creativity of local entrepreneurs and risk takers to figure out kind of businesses to create, what type of jobs to create and how big or small the job creators should be.
• Take a comprehensive approach that addresses the extra burdens government places on inner cities. The “Government Wedge” drives employment and wages everywhere,including inner cities. But only in inner cities is the Wedge compounded with the adverse consequences of “social engineering” and “industrial policy”.
• Acknowledge that production drives the economy. The mindset that “consumption drives the economy” is supportive of welfare dependency and redistribution schemes. The production mindset says “To better myself, I must make someone else better off. Before I can satisfy my needs I must first satisfy another’s needs.” With this mindset, Opportunity Zones can be viewed as areas rich in underutilized human resources and potential.
• Recognize that people respond to incentives. We have negative outcomes in inner cities largely because of negative incentives.
• Make it incentive based, so that only positive results and success are rewarded.
• At present, the phase out of means-tested benefits acts like a very high marginal tax rate. Much of the inner city population faces a marginal rate of 70% to over 100% as income moves from $22,000 to $40,000, if the phase out is treated as a tax. Why try to earn one more dollar if 70-100% is taxed.poverty trap can be closed.
• Tax relief should focus on payroll taxes since most new businesses are not profitable in early years. Further, this would attract lower skill, labor intensive businesses which would be a better match for the labor force.
• Make the application process voluntary but competitive. Base the award of an Opportunity Zone on how far state and local authorities are willing to go to increase incentives and reduce barriers and how much local support is in place. Essentially, we “match” only the best ideas that are most likely to succeed.
• Ideally, the zones should apply their understanding of Cain’s 3 Economic Guiding Principles:
1. Production drives the economy, not spending,
2. Risk taking drives growth
3. Measurements must be dependable, and focus on how reducing the “Government Wedge” enhances productive activity.
• Create a limited number of Opportunity Zone designations so that the scarcity drives value and encourages competition, but encourage each zone to be as large as possible.
• Establish minimum qualification standards based on poverty levels, unemployment levels and other objective measures indicating a distressed area.
• Winning districts will be awarded an Opportunity Zone based on the ability of local entrepreneurs to identify barriers holding them back. These will vary market to market.
• Only those in the zone know best what is holding them back. There will be no one size fits all. The following are issues we hear most often and represent a few examples:
• Local permitting process is to slow and cumbersome.
• All building codes, regulations, restrictions, and requirements should be reviewed from the standpoint of whether they impede economic growth.
• Minimum wage laws prevent many unskilled and inexperienced workers (i.e. teens) from getting their first job and prices them out of the market
• Zoning laws are outdated and hold back development
• Prevailing wage laws unfairly restrict the supply of labor
• There should be more tenant control of HUD properties
• Access to contracts and capital is skewed towards big business
• Incentives that are anti family should be repealed.
• Help should be based on a “hand up”, rather than a “hand out”
• Allow not just local governmental authorities but community groups, churches, and private sector associations, to submit plans indicating how barriers should be reduced and incentives increased to best suit their local circumstances. This empowers the community to take action without relying on the establishment to take the first step.
• Applicants should demonstrate visibility and local support of proposals.
Opportunity Zone Design
• The 9-9-9 Plan will essentially turn the whole country into one giant Opportunity Zone. Some of the most attractive features of the original Enterprise Zones, such as a zero capital gains tax, immediate expensing of business equipment, and no payroll taxes are “factory installed” in the 9-9-9 Plan for the whole country to benefit.
• In addition, districts designated as Opportunity Zones will have the following additional benefits:
• Deductions to employers for the total amount of payroll within in the Zone, subject to income limits. By basing it on payroll and not income, it reduces “gaming” and helps new businesses which generally don’t generate profits in early years.
• Value-added businesses that are more labor intensive get the most “bang for the buck.” This will match the existing labor pool better than, say, a high tech R & D lab or a law firm.
• Deductions will not be limited to “new” businesses or “new” jobs but are designed to benefit all within the Zone. Why not provide relief and reward those already struggling in the Zone, many of whom have been doing so for a long time. They are most likely to lead to economic renewal.
• Anyone living in the Zone will get a deduction (not a credit) and anyone working in the Zone will get a deduction (subject to income limits).
• Means tested benefits should be restructured or reformed so they don’t counteract the incentives for work.
huh?
Wow, that’s a big manifesto to say
end welfare and the minimum wage.
He who will not work will not eat.
“Cain’s Vision for Renewing Cities across the USA: Abort all the babies.”
What the h*ll are you talking about? Cain is pro-life. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar.
Do you have *anything* productive to say?
Sorry! I missed it. :-\
-- Hermain Cain on October 19, 2011
-- Hermain Cain on October 19, 2011
I just wanted the entire doc up so there would not be any arguement about it. The more the merrier. :-)
Thank you!
... TO “BRING UP” A BABY. Not abort a baby.
There is NO WAY that you don’t know that that quote is taken out of context.
**********************
INTERVIEWER: So, AC, do you believe that a man should have the right to beat his wife?
AC: I’m 100% against it.
INTERVIEWER: So you think that every man should be forced to stay in a bad marriage?
AC: I didn’t say that, you’re mixing the issues.
INTERVIEWER: But you would be for forcing a man to remain in a bad marriage...
AC: It’s not the government’s role, or anybody else’s role to make that decision.
*****************
Later somebody prints: advance_copy thinks that it’s not the role of government to stop men from beating their wives. Here’s his quote: “It’s not the government’s role, or anybody else’s role to make that decision.”
ADVANCE_COPY IS FOR THE ABUSE OF WOMEN.
the comment that i responded to, #2,
was removed.
The question was specifically about cases where the mother is pregnant due to rape.
Just prior to that, Cain said that he is opposed to abortion in ALL cases, including rape.
Is it better to use the federal tax code to force states and localities to do what the federal government wants them to do, if the things we are forcing them to do are things we agree with?
In other words, is our complaint about federal intrusion based on principle, or based on what kind of intrusion we have.
Because what I see are a lot of good ideas, which are pushed on states by using the tax dollars of people who live outside of these zones, to pay off the poeple who live in the zones.
So if my local government won’t enact what Cain thinks is best, I pay more in taxes, so someone else can pay less in taxes because THEIR government did what Cain wanted.
The one good thing of 9-9-9 was that it made everybody equal. But apparently, some people are more equal than others.
Don’t take that out of context, he is talking about rape or incest.
One can argue the pros and cons of these proposals, but what one cannot argue is that permits and building codes and minimum wage laws and zoning are local issues. For Cain to come in and say that the federal government is better equipped to decide what state and local government should do in these areas makes a mockery of the whole 10th Amendment.
just ignore him. he’s trying to hijack a discussion about the economic plight in the inner cities with pure propaganda BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.