Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The new, ugly debate about Mitt Romney's Mormon faith will only push him closer to the nomination
The Telegraph ^ | October 10th, 2011 | Tim Stanley

Posted on 10/09/2011 10:22:04 PM PDT by Ripliancum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 last
To: reaganaut

Whatever. Most Mormons believe in Christ the savior, son of god who died for their sins and salvation. Get past that and most don’t know jack else just like most of the approved churches on your list.

I have friends that are Baptist, Methodist, Catholics and even slipped up and let a Church of Christ get in my circle of friends. On the basics they all appear to be Christians but I don’t know their hearts like God does.

Personally, the last church I attended regularly was Baptist. Mostly I worship with my family in different ways depending on the season but still wander back a dozen or so times a year.


361 posted on 10/12/2011 7:30:31 PM PDT by Free_in_Alabama (The average citizen is to lazy to steal from you, instead they are asking the government to do it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
I'd vote for a Muslim if he was honestly committed to paying down the debt, getting federal regulations out of our lives, protecting religion, and preventing our tax dollars from going to socialist groups (ACLU, Planned Parenthood, etc).

Then he wouldn't be much of a MUSLIM; would he (she)?

362 posted on 10/12/2011 8:49:09 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Confab
First off, the UPC are NOT the only Christians to reject the Trinity. Did you mean to state I believe the UPC to be the only.....?

You spout off - name these "Christians" confab.

363 posted on 10/13/2011 8:30:05 AM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

You forgot to answer this one:

“Please, reaganaut, explain the Doctrine of Original Sin and it’s origins. Be certain to provide Biblical proofs. Also is sin nature the same as Original Sin?”


364 posted on 10/15/2011 5:45:16 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

And you never got to this one either. I await your scholarship.

“I will defer to you then. Please define:

God
begotten
virgin
‘where Christ took the sins upon himself’

Using the Bible with appropriate verse references and the Hebrew and Greek definitions of the above. No eisegsis now, sister.”


365 posted on 10/15/2011 5:46:26 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
based on his religion

I suppose that's why she posted this. It draws out the bigots, like mud on a snakebite.

366 posted on 10/15/2011 6:17:34 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; stars & stripes forever; Saundra Duffy; Ripliancum
As far as I know, the Bible doesn't talk about Mary's conception. Why should it?

The Bible does talk about her conception. It is specific about it because it is a most incredible event.

Look up the Greek for begotten. Here, I'll do it for you as your scholarship is wanting:

1080 gennáō – properly, beget (procreate a descendant), produce offspring; (passive) be born, "begotten."

gennaó: to beget, to bring forth

Original Word: γεννάω

Part of Speech: Verb

Transliteration: gennaó

Phonetic Spelling: (ghen-nah'-o)

Short Definition: I beget, bring forth, give birth to

Definition: I beget (of the male), (of the female) I bring forth, give birth to.

That should clarify the matter for you and stop your dissembling on this issue. But, wait! There's more:

Then said Mary unto the angel How shall this be seeing I know not a man

And the angel answered and said unto her The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God

Go to the site and do a word by word search to get the implications of Luke 1:35. There is nothing prurient in the conception of Jesus. It is in its proper context sacred. Of course, the Scriptures never call Mary a virgin again.

367 posted on 10/15/2011 6:31:47 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Bainbridge
My Dear Professor,

You couldn't be more wrong.

You avoided replying to the over 40 posts which are indictments of Mormon theology.

I don't have to reply to any of them, ever. I don't need to defend the theology of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. I simply look at where it hits perfectly with the Word of God aka the Bible.

Please peruse my postings and you'll see I've refuted many equivocations posted by the anti-Mormon contingent of Free Republic. Ours must be the pursuit of truth, no matter where it leads. The LDS more often than not hit it out of the park and spectacularly so. Why not educate yourself by starting here:

Theosis

Now, how many illiterate country bumpkins were talking theosis in America in the 1800s? You've got to give Joseph Smith some credit. How many Orthodox know about theosis? Catholics? Yet it is all part of their belief system.

368 posted on 10/15/2011 6:46:37 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Weak, My Dear Brother. You and I are spirits and we animate a body, no?

Furthermore, we get our bodies back, perfected, at the Resurrection, no?

Plus, we are made in God’s image and likeness, no?

What’s God’s likeness?

God sits and Jesus stands. Jesus was bodily resurrected. Angels (God’s messengers) can be seen. Heaven is an actual location. Jacob embraced God, etc., etc., etc.

The Bible fully supports a physical body for God the Father, Jesus Christ and us. Please read it, plainly, and leave the eisegesis at home.


369 posted on 10/15/2011 6:53:40 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Why didn’t God just mercifully start over and just reset the Garden? Why let Adam and Eve decide the fate of the rest of us?

If the Devil took advantage of the innocent naivete of Eve, why punish me for it? Start over and put us all back into the Garden in Eden.

Unless, there is another purpose to the Garden, Eve’s and then Adam’s actions and the introduction of sin into the world we inhabit during our mortality.


370 posted on 10/15/2011 6:58:06 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; Bainbridge; stars & stripes forever; Saundra Duffy; Ripliancum
Let's not exaggerate. LDS doctrine is very specific about the purpose, intention and way of mortal life. God's goal for us is to ‘to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man’.

Lesson 1: “This Is My Work and My Glory”

That's how it is taught and viewed. So any deviation from that path would be an abomination in the eyes of God. That's the correct meaning and interpretation. Just as the anti-Mormons see the LDS as an 'abomination' of their version of Christianity. See here:

Lying lips are abomination to the LORD but they that deal truly are his delight

or here:

Abomination NT Greek as in:

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet stand in the holy place whoso readeth let him understand

371 posted on 10/15/2011 7:08:23 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Sorry, missed it. you can do your own research, I am not your dog.


372 posted on 10/15/2011 9:10:02 AM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I am not your sister.


373 posted on 10/15/2011 9:10:34 AM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; stars & stripes forever; Saundra Duffy; Ripliancum
You said (post #157): What does the Bible say about the conception of Mary?

I responded: The Bible does talk about her conception. It is specific about it because it is a most incredible event.

The Bible doesn't talk about "the conception of Mary." IOW, How MARY's herself was conceived. I was talking about HER -- because you phrased it as if you were talking about HER. "The conception of Mary" has to do with the jumpstart of Mary's life.

So, again, why are you talking about the "conception of Mary?" The conception of Jesus? Yeah, I can understand talking about that, but the conception of Mary? Like I said, the Bible doesn't talk about that.

You just flunked home school 101 on a getting a basic English sentence right.

374 posted on 10/15/2011 4:26:37 PM PDT by Colofornian (Anyone who can be duped by Joseph Smith can be duped by anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; reaganaut
Why didn’t God just mercifully start over and just reset the Garden? Why let Adam and Eve decide the fate of the rest of us?

You know if you read the book of Romans carefully...you'll get the answer:

12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through ONE man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because ALL sinned— 13 To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone’s account where there is no law. 14 Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come. 15 But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the ONE man, how much more did God’s grace and the gift that came by the grace of the ONE man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many! 16 Nor can the gift of God be compared with the result of ONE man’s sin: The judgment followed ONE sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed MANY trespasses and brought justification. 17 For if, by the trespass of the ONE man, death reigned through that ONE man, how much more will those who receive God’s abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the ONE man, Jesus Christ!
18 Consequently, just as ONE trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also ONE righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people. 19 For just as through the disobedience of the ONE man the MANY were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the ONE man the many will be made righteous. (Romans 5:12-19)

Is it because of your Mormon works-righteousness orientation that you can neither...
...understand how the one man's obedience (Jesus) brought salvation to All of us?
...and neither understand how the one man's disobedience brought conmdemnation to all of us?

You're so wrapped up in individual righteousness...
...individual boy scout badges...
...individual worthiness...
...that you can't see that God judges us righteous only through Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 1:30). We are "worthy" ONLY in Christ! Our sin nature was in Adam. Our righteousness is in Christ. There is NO OTHER alternative to reading Romans 5:12-19!!!

The One act of Jesus is our salvation -- just like the one act of Adam was our tremendous loss. But Jesus trumps the loss...that is, if you accept His righteousness in your life over your own.

Study up Romans 5 very carefully, my friend. Look how much the action of "one" set in motion so much...through Adam for evil...through Jesus for absolute wonderment!

375 posted on 10/15/2011 4:41:08 PM PDT by Colofornian (Anyone who can be duped by Joseph Smith can be duped by anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Sorry, there 1010.
I was born in SLC and have Mormon Family. I am also a serious
Christian who understands the preposterous “theology” fabricated by the con man, glass looking, snake oil selling charlatan who made the whole thing up.

I am very sorry for you as your are completely deceived.


376 posted on 10/15/2011 4:57:25 PM PDT by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
The Bible fully supports a physical body for God the Father, Jesus Christ and us. Please read it, plainly, and leave the eisegesis at home.

I've read it quite a few times, have yet to stumble across a reference to Joseph Smith being an Apostle of Jesus Christ or a prophet. Perhaps you can point out where in the Bible Joseph Smith comes into play?
377 posted on 10/15/2011 7:38:04 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson