Posted on 10/07/2011 4:33:31 AM PDT by reasonisfaith
Yes--the leftist psychopaths, from Soros to Ayers and all the mind-numbed robots in their wake, have made a virtual martyr of Sarah Palin.
I’m ok with harsh. :-)
FReegards...
And what is your view of my initial statements in the beginning of this thread?
Sounds like you believe in big government while at the same time thinking you have to make posts criticizing it.
The anti-Palin [forces have] only succeeded in doing one thing--they have replaced a fallible (though quite impressive) human being by installing infallible principles in her place.To which I replied at 38:The anti-Palin [forces have] succeeded in replacing Palin with that which she and all of us always said was the most important anywaythe principles of our Constitution.
What you said about the situation with Palin and many, many. similar happenings throughout human history.Reagan had a famous motto of a similar observation:Its a truth of human reaction.
"There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." First Inaugural Address, January 21, 1981I noted it made no sense to agree with your observation, as it expressed a natural human dynamic as real and sure as the fall of an apple from a tree. That is, as a truth, it's not subject to being part of a popularity contest.
Sounds like you are an idiot and not worth conversing with. Look up the definition for the term “minarchist” before you make another stupid pronouncement.
If you think principles only matter when your candidate gets elected, like you said earlier, then you’re probably on the wrong side.
You might want to have someone else at Move On take over your account. I’ve dealt with trolls like you before and the schtick never changes.
“Move on” is a leftist organization. Let’s clarify some definitions:
Leftists advocate for big government.
Conservatives advocate for small government.
And the way to spot a leftist troll is when some isolated but significant segment of their ideology slips through as they otherwise attempt to sound conservative.
And you aren’t advocating either apparently.
Only in your deluded mind. Another thing you have in common with the lib-tards.
Althought I’m not sure you’re a disguised liberal, the hostility sure did come out right after the post where I implied liberals don’t understand things very well.
So if you’re opposed to the God given rights to small government, moral accountability, individual liberty and self sufficiencyheres your chance to explain why you oppose them.
It’s not illegal for a liberal to pose as a conservative on this website. But if this is you, just remember that due to the nature of progressivism relative to conservatism, it will be very difficult for a liberal to overcome a conservative using only logic and strength of intellect.
Actually, I'm for all of those things. But you knew that already. You might want to look up the definition for the term "projection" as it relates to your psychosis.
You might also want to work on how a private civilian, with no political power, is supposed to affect those principled changes in government.
Actually, you might want to look up "denial" as well. Sarah has changed her role on the chessboard from a potential Queen to just another Pawn.
You’ve made quite a few statements to me in these posts. Some are related to the topic at hand, but most are delivered in a very nasty and hostile manner.
Can you understand how this negates any and all credibility you could have hoped for, rendering your opinions meaningless and making it a likely possibility that your statements could be nothing but lies?
Please try to have more respect for yourself and for others. Good will is a centerpiece of Christianity, and of the English customs preserved by our founding fathers, and thus of American conservatism.
Your entire post had nothing to do with the thread, which makes you a hypocrite as well.
Have a nice day...
Awesome post! Now we’re getting somewhere.
So, given that you choose to embrace nastiness and hostility above all else, and given that these qualities are completely independent of the ability to make truthful statements, and given the fact that the number of possible variations of any statement is very high and that the truthful version is only one of these many variations, then by mathematical necessity your statements will miss the truth the vast majority of the time. (This outcome can be observed in an example as recent as your last post to me.)
And when you hit on the truth it will be due entirely to probability, owing nothing to your efforts.
Almost.
“by mathematical necessity your statements will miss the truth the vast majority of the time”
Well, this phrase is neither random nor meaningless. Read the post again.
I will go back and re-read your post, but I need you to something for me then; Go take a long walk off a short pier.
Ok? Thanks...
If your comments are not logically coherent, what’s the point in posting them?
You’ve stated on this thread that you’re in favor of moral accountability.
Can you reconcile this claim logically with either your own self-description as a nasty and hostile person, or with what said in your last post?
There is significant potential for you to gain insight here, which will help you to focus more effectively on truly understanding and supporting the principles of our Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.