Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killing of U.S.-born terrorist raises questions (Can the rookie Hussein assassinate?)
The Eagle ^ | 10/01/11 | MATT APUZZO

Posted on 10/01/2011 5:55:13 AM PDT by Libloather

Killing of U.S.-born terrorist raises questions
By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press
Published Saturday, October 01, 2011 12:06 AM

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama steered the nation's war machine into uncharted territory Friday when a U.S. drone attacked a convoy in Yemen and killed two American citizens who had become central figures in al-Qaida.

It was believed to be the first instance in which a U.S. citizen was tracked and executed based on secret intelligence and the president's say-so. And it raised major questions about the limitations of presidential power.

**SNIP**

"This court recognizes the somewhat unsettling nature of its conclusion -- that there are circumstances in which the executive's unilateral decision to kill a U.S. citizen overseas is 'constitutionally committed to the political branches' and judicially unreviewable," Bates wrote. "But this case squarely presents such a circumstance."

(Excerpt) Read more at theeagle.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: killing; questions; terrorist; yemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Pining_4_TX

Whatever happened to “WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE?”


21 posted on 10/01/2011 6:18:37 AM PDT by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

I bet the families of the Ft. Hood massacre are happy.


22 posted on 10/01/2011 6:19:32 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Isn't it ironic that foreign terrorists are given every right and a US citizen has no rights?

Of course, he was an anchor baby, no?

I am dense and to me it doesn't add up.

23 posted on 10/01/2011 6:22:43 AM PDT by mckenzie7 (Democrats = Trough Sloppers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

At the very least the Justice Dept should have gotten an indictment months ago.


24 posted on 10/01/2011 6:23:06 AM PDT by tobyhill (A Democrat that doesn't lie would be a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I believe Awlaki had dual citizenship. If he’s not a 100% American, then he’s not American. Dual citizenship is crap; I don’t care who it is. I’m very pro-Israel, but even they need to decide if they’re Israelis or Americans. Awlaki was a Yemeni terrorist. Period. He’s dead. Good.


25 posted on 10/01/2011 6:24:38 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
Bonnie and Clyde were US citizens on US soil but I don’t consider them “assassinated”.

There were also a bunch of "Wanted Dead or Alive" signs for Bonnie and Clyde.

Where were the "Wanted Dead or Alive" signs for the terrorist? Or, does the POTUS have to rule on each and every one these days?

26 posted on 10/01/2011 6:26:53 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
Well, at least they didn’t waterboard him.

Exactly...

I wonder if the NYTimes pointed that out.

27 posted on 10/01/2011 6:27:04 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
With ALL the evidence the Government supposedly had against him, why there no indictment months ago?

Obama didn't want to capture him. Then he might have to take him to Gitmo.

28 posted on 10/01/2011 6:29:09 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I thought this guy was on our side..He sounds like Code Pink and the other moronic morons out there..I say kill all the murdering fools..Ron Paul the terrorist lover..

http://www.mediaite.com/online/ron-paul-condemns-obama-administration-for-assasinating-u-s-born-anwar-al-awlaki/


29 posted on 10/01/2011 6:29:43 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mckenzie7
Isn't it ironic that foreign terrorists are given every right and a US citizen has no rights?

Bears repeating. I'm shocked at all the folks who think any US Citizen being deemed a target for killing by a President is just dandy. If a previous President had thought of this, he could have simply declared Randy Weaver an "enemy of the state" and then strafed his house from the air.

It could easily be any one of us next time.

30 posted on 10/01/2011 6:31:06 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I like both Perry and Palin, and will vote for whichever of them wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Probably looked like this:

http://youtu.be/Ve_ctzZPdZk


31 posted on 10/01/2011 6:31:22 AM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570; momofthree

Do you remember the uproar when some state officials told officers to be on the lookout for potential domestic “terrorists” based on bumper stickers, such as pro-life bumper stickers? Liberals are trying to shut conservatives up, and I’m sure they would love to be able to lock us up. The only thing stopping them is the protection we have under our Constitution, and that protection has to apply to all American citizens.

Are you saying it’s OK for the president to have someone killed just because they are not on US soil? We have trials for the worst, most violent people in the US, and that is to stop us from becoming a police state. The Soviet Union was the country where the government could declare someone to be an enemy of the state with no proof nor trial and just execute him. Is that what we want to become?

As for this being war, war is what politicians always use as an excuse to suspend our rights and curtail our freedom. What is a war on terror anyway? It’s not like a war on a country. Terror is a tactic, so when does “terror” sit down and sign surrender papers? Saying we are in a war on terror means we will be in a state of perpetual war, because terror will always be with us. If laws can be suspended during war, then look for further erosion of our rights and liberties.

If I were made Queen (so, you see I am a Dudette and not a Dude), I would go for the home run. I would ban the Islamic religion in the US and deport all Muslims. Might as well do something with all that power that would really make us safer.


32 posted on 10/01/2011 6:33:16 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I’m sure they are. I am, too, that this guy is dead. What I am not happy about is having a president that can make himself judge and executioner. We don’t need no stinkin’ laws.


33 posted on 10/01/2011 6:34:48 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
I hope His Yemeni citizenship and Muslim name were not held against him when the order to snuff him was given. If we simply called him Andy instead of Anwar and sent him to Harvard, his life could have been so different.
34 posted on 10/01/2011 6:34:59 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Kill more islamists.


35 posted on 10/01/2011 6:35:13 AM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
An indictment doesn't mean they couldn't kill him under the rules of war but it would have alleviated any questions about legality in hitting a US Citizen.

Even Bin Laden was indicted.

The old saying is, you can indict a ham sandwich.

36 posted on 10/01/2011 6:35:13 AM PDT by tobyhill (A Democrat that doesn't lie would be a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

You forget that, to the Left, as Rush has pointed out on many occasions, WE are more feared and hated as a danger to this country than any muslim terrorist.

How are we going to stop them from going after the really big threats instead of just extreme muslim terrorists?


37 posted on 10/01/2011 6:37:00 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

You know, I had not thought about that. I wonder how that came about in the old West? That is really interesting. They had lynch mobs, too, but it would seem that there may have not been much concern about those things then. I wonder when all that changed?


38 posted on 10/01/2011 6:37:24 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: healy61

It raised one question for me too, who’s next? Beck, limbaugh,hannity or anyone that gets in his way?


39 posted on 10/01/2011 6:42:17 AM PDT by muddler (Diligentia, Vis and Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Nothing new. Eric Holder was working for Janet Reno the last time.

Sometimes an American President needs to kill American citizens without trials.


40 posted on 10/01/2011 6:44:36 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson