Gee. It only takes an 8th grade education. I guess that means the Democrats will be able to influence the next election.
To: antidemoncrat
Easy to control any information via electronics. Paper sounds good to me. It worked for over 200 years. Don’t fix something that ain’t broke.
2 posted on
09/30/2011 11:50:30 AM PDT by
RC2
To: antidemoncrat
You need unobserved and unmolested access to the circuit boards in the voting machine. Give me unobserved and unmolested access to a paper ballot box and I can “hack” it also by simply stuffing it with premarked ballots. Much easier than splicing in a new electronic circuit.
5 posted on
09/30/2011 11:56:18 AM PDT by
Prokopton
To: antidemoncrat
6 posted on
09/30/2011 11:57:28 AM PDT by
momf
(Gun control is not about guns; it's about control..(replace the word Gun with any change they want.))
To: antidemoncrat
I saw this elsewhere.
Yeah. “Simple”, provided you have physical access to the machine and can disassemble it without leaving a trace, etc.
By that standard, an ATM is “simple” to crack too.
9 posted on
09/30/2011 12:00:55 PM PDT by
Pessimist
To: antidemoncrat
I think we should break out the purple dye and see how the dims fare in the next election.
10 posted on
09/30/2011 12:01:23 PM PDT by
GraceG
To: antidemoncrat
Purple inks seems to work well........
11 posted on
09/30/2011 12:03:16 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(We cannot defeat an enemy that the president and hence his administration cannot name.......)
To: antidemoncrat
So apparently hackers will decide the next election. Each candidate will have to hire their own hacker and anti-hacker and then let the battle begin.
This scenario would make a good pre-election movie.
13 posted on
09/30/2011 12:05:23 PM PDT by
PoloSec
( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
To: antidemoncrat
So anyone WITH ACCESS to the machine could do it? Looks like controlling access is the key. Besides, potentially you would have to access hundreds of the machines to make a national election difference.
14 posted on
09/30/2011 12:06:53 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: antidemoncrat
ALTERNATE HEADLINE: “Dems confident in regaining House, keeping Senate, White House”
15 posted on
09/30/2011 12:11:24 PM PDT by
LaybackLenny
(All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
To: antidemoncrat
This looks like another example of government funded research to find out what everybody already knows - if you can take apart something, modify it, and then put it back in service without anybody noticing you can perpetrate pretty much any kind of crime you want - including fixing elections.
This can and has been done with ATM machines, card swipe terminals in supermarkets, etc.
In actual practice taking the voting machines apart and hacking them involves breaking in to and working for hours in government buildings without being noticed, creating replacement seals that can pass the inspection of poll workers, etc. It is more of a movie plot than a practical idea.
So why did we spend taxpayer money on the research in the first place?
To: antidemoncrat; RC2; GOPJ; MNDude; Prokopton; momf; lwoodham; Explorer89; Pessimist; GraceG; ...
Oh for crying out loud.
Far easier for a single, high-school dropout campaign worker to simply throw a box of paper ballots in a dumpster.
If you have (1) unlimited access to the machine, (2) and can take the case apart and (3) can solder a daughtecard onto the circuit board -which is obvious for later fraud investigation- and can (4) control thousands of machines in real time to “blank the screen and change the vote” from only yards away from dozens? thousands? of polling stations....
Really? This is a concern?
18 posted on
09/30/2011 12:24:00 PM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: antidemoncrat
...can remotely manipulate voting machines...
The private market is so much more cost effective than govt. The govt spends billions in food stamps to accomplish the same thing.
19 posted on
09/30/2011 12:32:41 PM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
To: antidemoncrat
Gee. It only takes an 8th grade education. I guess that means the Democrats will be able to influence the next election. I imagine ACORN and SEIU knew this in 2008 and just didn't do it enough in 2010. We have to watch in 2012!
23 posted on
09/30/2011 1:11:14 PM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: antidemoncrat
This is why leftist (and their friends across the aisle) demanded computerized voting machines after Gore was foiled in Florida. Anyone with a brain knew they could fix election with computerized elections! The Chad stuff was BS.
To: antidemoncrat
ID + optically-scanned paper ballot, although it didn't prevent zombie overvoting in my state last time...
Purple ink is a winning idea.
To: antidemoncrat
28 posted on
09/30/2011 2:10:18 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
To: antidemoncrat
There was a frequent guest on Art Bell’s show, CoasttoCoastam who warned about the vulnerability of voting machines since 2000 or so. She works for an computer auditing firm and hired someone to hack into the voting machines. I remember being dismayed about how easy it was to alter the most important citizen power, the right to vote.
Nobody seemed to care when the Demos in Washington and SF produced box after box of “found” ballots in the 2004, 2006, and 2008 elections.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson