IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.
IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.
IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
No one cares about the two rino humping each other.
Healthcare is a much worse problem because it leaves us without a free country. At least with illegal immigration, we're still around to fight another day.
Yup.....this is what I’ve been saying. We have 2 guys, who each own 2 positions, that the conservative base cannot live with. This situation may cost us the 2012 election if either Romney or Perry runs against Obama.
Perry's comment was in response to the badgering he was taking fron Mitt Romney and Chris Wallace, the "don't have a heart" comment was addressed to them. I watched the debate, I never thought he was talking about me or other conservatives. He was visibly annoyed by the two smarmy weasels Wallace and Romney. Perry should explain that, not apologize for it. If he apologizes he'll just be accused of pandering or flipfloping. He can expain it or ignore it, but he would be crazy to apologize.
Perry need to take control of the conversation. He needs to stop being pushed around. Instead of stating what he is against he needs to emphasis what he is for and why. He needs to emphasis what he has positively done about the border issue.
Lots of mental acrobatics going on here to pretend Perry would not try to carry on the same open borders policies nationally as he has as governor of Texas. He calls a fence “ridiculous” and opposes mandatory use of e-Verify, both absurd positions for anyone remotely serious about enforcing immigration law. And also the Dream Act thing and he said the Arizona law was “not right for Texas”.
Romney’s using the tenth to justify Romneycare and Perry using it to justify many things related to immigration are both weak excuses.
Both Romney and Perry have albatrosses around theirs necks from their actions as governors on two critical national issues. Does anyone really think Romney would fight to keep Obamacare? Would he sign a repeal of Obamacare if Congress passed it?
These two large negatives look about equal to me and I’d like to see someone else emerge who doesn’t have either of these abatrosses around their necks (Palin or Cain, maybe, but definitely not Christie).
Don't count on me, Erik! I will never vote for that flip-flopping liberal bastard.
The in-state tuition issue with Perry doesn't rise to the level of disgust and hypocrisy that plagues Romneycare. Romneycare was the basis for Obamacare and Myth can't run from that fact no matter how often he says he'll dismantle Zero's mandated health care program.
The Texas in-state tuition law provides a ~$100,000 benefit to a family as a direct result of the family's long-standing violation of federal immigration law.
Providing in-state tuition ought to be a federal felony. John Calhoun might have considered it a legitimate state's rights issue.
We won’t have to choose between two crap sandwiches when Palin jumps in...
Unlike Perry and Romney - Cain has unquestionable conservative credentials.
Erick Erickson has become a joke. Does anyone actually pay attention to him any more?
Romney’s healthcare position makes him un-American.
Perry’s illegal immigration position makes him a scofflaw.
These two personages have contempt for us and should be shunned and ignored.
Say no to both...
Romney endorsed amnesty too.
Perry is a big-government porker in TX.
Vote for Herman Cain.
The story of American jobs and labor is deeply intertwined with predatory Federal, state and local taxation and regulation....
South Koreans sleep soundly on their border with NORKS because of American Taxpayer dollars and the American GI.
Why can’t Texans, New Mexicans, Arizonans and Californians?....BECAUSE
Illegal immigration is THE KEY to the perpetuation of the status quo in DC......
Predatory tax and regulatory policies-actions that basically serve to perpetuate and grow governments-leave what business is left in the country seeking disposable labor.
Illegal Labor is the Feds out for preserving the status quo regarding Taxes and Regulation. Interestingly, that is WHY the Feds encourage in-state tuition etc for illegals under-the-table -their presence providing disposable labor allows Federal, State and local regulatory and tax excess in the status quo to continue
Immigration is the ultimate litmus test as to the candidates in question commitment to meaningful regulatory and tax reform. If they are wishy-washy on the subject...they have no real intent to disturb the DC status quo...no matter how big their cowboy hat and six-gun.
Real”leadership” is that which will place Flyover Country’s interest ahead of the Feds....haven’t yet seen anything meaningful anywhere from anybody to indicate that might happen. We have just one more election cycle to make that happen via rule of law. Otherwise its the end of the run for America.
Cain
Gingrich
Perry
Romney
Santorum
Bachmann
Not gonna bother with the rest.