Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2011 2:15:46 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ReformationFan
The reason women voted for Clinton was because they felt sorry for Hillary.
They figured if they could get the adulterous bastard elected president,Hillary could then divorce his sorry cheatin’ ass and keep The House.
2 posted on 09/27/2011 2:20:36 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Yer it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
One is that, being the more emotion-driven sex, women are more susceptible to liberals' emotional appeals.

Silly little darlings...

3 posted on 09/27/2011 2:20:59 PM PDT by Kenton (Barack Obama - Lowering American Expectations Since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

One conclusion that could be drawn from this: The majority of women are IDIOTS.


4 posted on 09/27/2011 2:22:20 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government? by John Lott, Jr.
5 posted on 09/27/2011 2:24:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

The women got the vote and the nation got Harding.


6 posted on 09/27/2011 2:25:43 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ceterum autem censeo, Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Actually, I read an article on this a number of years ago. It can be further granularized. If you remove married women from the list it is wildly liberal. Single women want the government to be their sugar daddy. It’s the welfare state writ large: The state is better than a man because it won’t waste the money on booze, it won’t gamble away the rent check, it won’t sleep around and, let’s face it, living with another adult that doesn’t acquiesce to your every whim is just, well, hard.


7 posted on 09/27/2011 2:30:38 PM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Not only is ‘The View’ a hit, it is considered a show analyzing current events.

The demographic overlap between the observation in the thread, and the audience of The View is no coincidence.


9 posted on 09/27/2011 2:36:11 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Although in gross numbers this is true, what is important in elections is the SHIFT in voters. In 2004, the shift in women voters toward Bush is what gave him his second term (the male vote between the parties remaind virtually unchanged from 2000).

This “women are silly” message is not a good one for conservatives to persue. It will hurt them.

More women are Independents than men. Conservatives will probably never get a majority of women’s votes ... but they can steadily get MORE of them. This is what is important.

Alienating potential voters, no matter how few, is not a smart political move (look how the liberal meme of voters not being smart enough hurt them in 2010).

Plus, there are many solidly conservative women who are turned off by this message.

Keep these statistics in mind:
1. There are more women eligible to vote than there are men eligible to vote.
2. There are more women registered to vote than men.
3. Registered women voters actually vote in larger percentages than male registerd voters. (In 2004, 8.8 MILLION more women voted than men did).

So even small shifts in women’s votes can make a big difference in an election.

You don’t have to have all the women’s votes, you just have to have enough to win.


11 posted on 09/27/2011 2:52:46 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Bump


12 posted on 09/27/2011 2:52:46 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Although in gross numbers this is true, what is important in elections is the SHIFT in voters. In 2004, the shift in women voters toward Bush is what gave him his second term (the male vote between the parties remaind virtually unchanged from 2000).

This “women are silly” message is not a good one for conservatives to persue. It will hurt them.

More women are Independents than men. Conservatives will probably never get a majority of women’s votes ... but they can steadily get MORE of them. This is what is important.

Alienating potential voters, no matter how few, is not a smart political move (look how the liberal meme of voters not being smart enough hurt them in 2010).

Plus, there are many solidly conservative women who are turned off by this message.

Keep these statistics in mind:
1. There are more women eligible to vote than there are men eligible to vote.
2. There are more women registered to vote than men.
3. Registered women voters actually vote in larger percentages than male registerd voters. (In 2004, 8.8 MILLION more women voted than men did).

So even small shifts in women’s votes can make a big difference in an election.

You don’t have to have all the women’s votes, you just have to have enough to win.


14 posted on 09/27/2011 3:15:24 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

This is the most sexist, vomit inducing, stereotypical drivel I have ever read. Whatever idiot male wrote this has no knowledge of women whatsoever, outside of an abnormal fantasy life. Most Tea Party members are women, myself included.


15 posted on 09/27/2011 3:26:47 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan; BillyBoy; Diana in Wisconsin; Allegra; calcowgirl; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; ...

Repeal the 19th!!!!

I’m kidding ladies don’t hurt me!!!


20 posted on 09/27/2011 5:08:43 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson