Posted on 09/15/2011 9:44:24 PM PDT by xjcsa
From Simon Conway's Facebook page:
"SOURCES CLOSE TO THE CAMP..... As predicted on my show nine days ago, Sarah Palin to announce for the Presidency tomorrow (Friday) - the day Constitution Day is observed. We'll be talking about it on 540 WFLA from 6am Eastern...."
Because it was slammed by Dems, taken to court and Palin was forced to return the money.
Admit it............you have NEVER really paid attention to politics and news. If you hear something, it's in one ear and out the other, or you just tune it all out.
And you want us all to believe that you are the only CONSERVATIVE ( which you patently aren't )in the history department at UT?
Don't flatter yourself. No one's asked for your opinion. Those were all rhetorical questions, professor.
I know exactly what you mean. ;o)
Where did you learn that being called a liar is evidence that one is winning an argument? Where did you learn that people who are losing arguments usually call their opponents “stupid” and “dumbasses?”
It is not so much anti-Palin as anti-conservative. Palin does not have to be the vessel of conservatism, but she just happens to be the only one at this time. Make some good suggestions and I will be happy to consider them.
That should be 'any more', professor.
It's two words in that context, not one.
Just wanted you to know I got my new book “FED UP!” at my doorstep today. Thanks again for your link.
I am focused on retaining the House and winning the Senate.
So who would theoretically make a good fit? Kasich? No. Newt? Forget it. Cain? Maybe. Tommy Franks? Maybe. [/wild, meaningless, but fun late-night speculation].
; ~)
This self credentialled history prof is not only completely bereft of any facts, she is also vocabulary challenged, needs several courses in logic, and completely deficient in knowledge re politics of any kind.
The "RUSH TEST" was also a dead give away! LOL
But that is everybody, including you.
It's beyond the time you should have quit digging. LOL
Um, I think it is correct to use obtuse the way she used it. Basically, in that context, it’s just a fancy word for stupid. The lack of angular sharpness (its mathematical meaning) correlates to the notion of dullness, which is how you get to the sense of lacking intelligence, i.e., someone or something that is dull. Unless I’m missing something, I think her usage was technically correct, even if it wasn’t an accurate description of the post in question. Sorry.
I “brought it” long ago and buried you. You’re just too dumb to realize it and I didn’t have to resort to name calling, as you did/do.
Geez... that was a freaking stretch, Stretch!
Pinging myself to this thread for ...reasons.
Well, I’ll give you one thing, Palin will be making an announcement, whether on this radio program or elsewhere, it could be anywhere, and at anytime. It will be before September ends, so be expecting her answer in the next couple of weeks. It could be tomorrow, it could be next week or the week after, but it will come. And it will be a surprise either one way or the other when it occurs, because no one knows when she is going to do it. So everyone have fun anticipating the announcement date for the next couple of weeks, and then we will all know and it will be onto the next surprise in politics, because there always is one.
Geez... that was a freaking stretch, Stretch!
; ~ )
You are a LIAR of the first order and a stupid one. Why did I just call you "stupid"? Because anyone with eyes will know that you just lied about me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.