Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama picks more females, minorities for judges
Associated Press ^ | September 13, 2011 | Jesse J. Holland

Posted on 09/13/2011 11:26:11 AM PDT by triumphant values

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is moving at a historic pace to try to diversify the nation's federal judiciary: Nearly three of every four people he has gotten confirmed to the federal bench are women or minorities. He is the first president who hasn't selected a majority of white males for lifetime judgeships.

More than 70 percent of Obama's confirmed judicial nominees during his first two years were "non-traditional," or nominees who were not white males. That far exceeds the percentages in the two-term administrations of Bill Clinton (48.1 percent) and George W. Bush (32.9 percent), according to Sheldon Goldman, author of the authoritative book "Picking Federal Judges."

"It is an absolutely remarkable diversity achievement," said Goldman, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, who is only counting judges once, even if they fit more than one category.

The White House recently has been touting its efforts to diversify the federal bench during Obama's tenure, now approaching three years in office.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; collapse; discrimination; diversity; feminism; judiciary; matriarchy; obama; racism; tribal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
He is the first president who hasn't selected a majority of white males for lifetime judgeships.

Hey White man, just because your ancestors carved the most powerful nation in the world out of a wilderness, and just because it was White men who invented, well pretty much everything in the modern world, that doesn't mean you should be allowed to run that country.

Time to step aside and hand it over, and if you won't well then they'll make you.

1 posted on 09/13/2011 11:26:17 AM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

And ugly ones, at that..........


2 posted on 09/13/2011 11:27:25 AM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

all socialist..........


3 posted on 09/13/2011 11:29:06 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Rather than the race or sex of his selections, my guess the POLITICAL IDEOLOGY of them reflects his anti-American, biased, racist, leftist viewpoint.

But then, don’t these have to clear Congress?

Where are the castrati in the GOP while this is going on?


4 posted on 09/13/2011 11:29:10 AM PDT by ZULU (ANYBODY but Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Oppression will become an everyday affair. We are getting what the majority voted for.


5 posted on 09/13/2011 11:29:38 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Headline prediction after next Republican President nominates judges... White Men nominated to bench women and minorities hardes hit.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 11:29:42 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

And in other breaking news, the sun rose in the east today.


7 posted on 09/13/2011 11:30:09 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

The left openly promotes discrimination based on color, gender, and sexual orientation.

It is time to take them at their word.

They are un-American scumbags.


8 posted on 09/13/2011 11:30:52 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

I wouldn’t mind if the pics had measurable IQs. However, since the Obamaloon picked them, we all know that there’s not a single one capable of signing their name without an auto-writer.


9 posted on 09/13/2011 11:31:14 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

How many left handed people has he picked? How about people with moles on their cheeks? Descendants of the French King Charlemagne? Former barbers? Residents of Guam? I want to see some REAL diversity.


10 posted on 09/13/2011 11:32:31 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

In this Obama-love piece they forgot to add the fact that he throws a baseball like a girl (no doubt because he is so sympathetic to women).


11 posted on 09/13/2011 11:32:37 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

I’ll bet the same is true of all the new IRS hires.


12 posted on 09/13/2011 11:32:44 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie (PRAY FOR TEXAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

In Russia there are some 90% female judges. And they have it since mid40s.


13 posted on 09/13/2011 11:33:56 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
In their rush to elect the first Black president, they elected the worst president.
14 posted on 09/13/2011 11:35:34 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

Affirmative action at its finest. Their only qualifications are that they are minorities and women, and most likely totally incompetent.


15 posted on 09/13/2011 11:36:08 AM PDT by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

I’m not prejudice, I dislike both halves of Barack.
Of all the candidates available what percentage does this 70% nominate represent. No, Barack does not hate white males./s


16 posted on 09/13/2011 11:37:16 AM PDT by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Yes. But trying to put myths about tribal matriarchies into practice in the USA has been a bipartisan effort for decades, and we’re about to see the economic and other consequences of that.


17 posted on 09/13/2011 11:37:51 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), Army NG, '89-' 96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Oh God, bring on these adorable beauties of brainless...I can’t wait...


18 posted on 09/13/2011 11:39:17 AM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
But trying to put myths about tribal matriarchies into practice in the USA has been a bipartisan effort for decades, and we’re about to see the economic and other consequences of that.

We're already seeing it and have had a matriarchal experiment going on in our inner-cities for decades. Matriarchies of minorities are pretty nasty places, from what I see.

19 posted on 09/13/2011 11:41:42 AM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

The anti-white president.


20 posted on 09/13/2011 11:45:33 AM PDT by edcoil (The will to win is important, but the will to prepare is vital. -- Joe Paterno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson