Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Labor Dept. Data: Only 1.75 Full-Time Private Sector Workers Per Social Security Recipient
CNS News ^ | 9/12/11 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 09/12/2011 4:11:50 PM PDT by Nachum

(CNSNews.com) - There were only 1.75 full-time private-sector workers in the United States last year for each person receiving benefits from Social Security, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Social Security board of trustees.

That means that for each husband and wife who worked full-time in the private sector last year there was a Social Security recipient somewhere in the country taking benefits from the federal government.

Most state and local workers are part of the Social Security system and pay Social Security taxes; and, since 1984, all federal workers have been part of the system and pay Social Security taxes. However, unlike private sector workers who pay Social Security taxes with private-sector dollars, government workers pay their payroll taxes out of wages government pays them with tax dollars or with money that was borrowed by government and taxpayers must eventually repay.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: data; dept; labor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2011 4:11:59 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 09/12/2011 4:13:19 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

You know what? Governor Perry is the ONLY one who has flat out stated that Social Security is a bust! That he called it a “Ponzi-Scheme” is elementary - the truth is it’s busted, broke, and someone had better da@n well be serious about changing the whole system - someone who can challenge our SELF-SERVING, COUNTRY-CLUB ATMOSPHERE MEMBERS of CONGRESS before we’re DONE as a NATION!!!


3 posted on 09/12/2011 4:24:05 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Talk about creating accounting...


4 posted on 09/12/2011 4:26:17 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

for starters, the feds need to redeem their IOUs that they deposited in the Trust Fund during prior “raids” for cash — to the tune of $2.67 trillion.

That would be a good place to start. Then the Social Security Trust Fund wouldn’t be broke for quite some little while.

— Jane Reinheimer


5 posted on 09/12/2011 4:28:14 PM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is getting ridiculous. Such a topsy-turvy world in which we live where newborns come out already hopelessly indebted to those who were lucky enough to be born before them.


6 posted on 09/12/2011 4:29:08 PM PDT by 3Fingas ( Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quintr
for starters, the feds need to redeem their IOUs that they deposited in the Trust Fund during prior “raids” for cash — to the tune of $2.67 trillion.

That would be a good place to start. Then the Social Security Trust Fund wouldn’t be broke for quite some little while.

— Jane Reinheimer

That was meant to be sarcasm, right?

You do know that would be the equivalent of you writing yourself a check for a million dollars and then calling yourself a millionaire, don't you?

7 posted on 09/12/2011 4:31:57 PM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: quintr

And the new thing is letting people pay less payroll tax (SS tax). Obama is proposing not collecting 6.2% in this new bill....


8 posted on 09/12/2011 4:38:57 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
You do know that would be the equivalent of you writing yourself a check for a million dollars and then calling yourself a millionaire, don't you?

"We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle." -- Winston Churchill

9 posted on 09/12/2011 4:42:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We still hold these truths to be self-evident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
THE SOLUTION: Tell the little crooks in Washington to stop stealing the money citizens put aside for their retirement.

NO MORE SLUSH FUNDS.

NO MORE LIES.

If a company did this with their pension money, they'd be arrested.

10 posted on 09/12/2011 4:43:40 PM PDT by GOPJ (126 people were indicted for being terrorists in the last two years. Every one of them was Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quintr

Can somebody explain to me why (young) prisoners get SS checks in Jail, and Illegals get them, many even mailed to them in Mexico? Doesn’t Obumo have something like 17 Social Security numbers? Does that mean he and Moochelle will get 17 checks per month? (Do we know how many SS numbers Ms. Hussein has?)


11 posted on 09/12/2011 4:44:30 PM PDT by holyscroller ( Without God, America is one nation under)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Rut-roh....

GM was at either 2.3 to 1or something like that when they were on the road to oblivion...

Yes, more musical chairs on the deck of the Titanic Mr. Obama, more music, Please !!!!

12 posted on 09/12/2011 4:45:47 PM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
THE SOLUTION: Tell the little crooks in Washington to stop stealing the money citizens put aside for their retirement.

But the thing is it was never set aside. From day one SS was just another income tax and it was paid from the Treasury the same as any other government check or bill.

NO MORE LIES.

Well yes, politicians in their speeches lied, but the actual law was there for any one to read from August 14, 1935 on. There was never any SS fund. No pension account, nothing. Just income taxes in, checks out.

People are angry because they feel duped. But they were only duped because of lack of ambition to read the law for themselves and not just take Cliff notes from politicians.

Most people preferred the lies to the truth anyway. They wanted to believe it was a pension insurance fund set aside just for them.

They didn't want to know it was a welfare check paid out in the same manner as any other government program.

Because if they could convince themselves it wasn't, they could feel like they wouldn't be taking "relief" as it was called in those days.

Then the self-deception was passed down generation to generation until now where it's so deeply ingrained people will get angry if you tell them the truth and will deny it until their dying breath.

13 posted on 09/12/2011 4:56:55 PM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
In the not too distant future each recipient will have their own personal contributor.
14 posted on 09/12/2011 5:15:37 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quintr

Who pays for the IOU’s?


15 posted on 09/12/2011 5:25:02 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

In all fairness, they were told it was being invested in Government bonds. What they weren’t told is that they Government bonds than couldn’t be bought or sold.


16 posted on 09/12/2011 5:28:24 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

But what about the “lock box”? Is it empty? (he said knowing that Al Gore has always been a lying dweeb...)


17 posted on 09/12/2011 5:33:08 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
It's NOT a welfare check when citizen pay for it.

We know dems and their lies - and this one's a BIG LIE. Right now, liberals are using Social Security to replace welfare in inner cities - they're signing up the usual dependent ones for disability - and creepy liberal lawyers are making a bundle on it. The dependent ones will work for two years and be 'disabled' for the next 60 years. And we'll be paying for it until the system is bankrupt. When there are no funds, those who are faking disabilities will move on to the next scam - and the people who really are disabled will die.

But that doesn't bother a liberal.

They only care about the victim groups who vote for them. The one's they pay off with our money. So we do want the truth - and we want the truth out there. Sadly, the MSM gets their marching orders ( stories fed to them ) from friends on the left side.

18 posted on 09/12/2011 5:34:52 PM PDT by GOPJ (126 people were indicted for being terrorists in the last two years. Every one of them was Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well...THAT’s gonna last a whole lot longer!!


19 posted on 09/12/2011 5:36:36 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Don’t forget that Social Security also pays “disability” benefits to those who have worked as little as two years in their lifetimes (SSD) and even have not ever worked at all (SSI).

Cut all that out and just focus on the retirees and Social Security will stay solvent long enough to keep the promises made to the retired and soon-to-be-retired.

We forget about all the moochers bankrupting the Social Security system.


20 posted on 09/12/2011 5:38:47 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson