It is worth a “Perry ping” — Perry video played, Palin gives her opinion to Laura Ingram about Perry and his statements, including his statements about Social Security.
Now, if only her supporters would listen...
Maybe instead of “video” in the title you could put “video - Go make some popcorn”. Just thinking.
Video at link does not play for me (new iMac with Safari)
The thing that most impressed me about this video clip is just how far Palin has come in improving her ability to answer interview questions. She really sounded presidential.
On the other hand, Perry, even though I’m sure it’s not a fair characterization, sounded like Bush. I can already picture the Obama commercials in my mind - Bush 3. Ugh.
I hope Palin does decide to get in. It better be soon.
It certainly was nothing approaching a rebuke. I still expect her to eventually endorse him when the time is right.
Oops — it’s Megan Kelly, not Laura Ingram, sorry.
But Sarah Palin is really Sarah Palin.
Stay with the Party, Palin!
That’s Meaghan Kelly hosting
I'll take care of the speck if you will clear up the log.
Have a blessed evening.
I like this one also.
It's one where RINO Mitt Perry endorses pro-abortion, pro-gay and anti-Second Amendment, cross-dressing liberal Rudy Giuliani for president. What a guy!
:^)
What can I say? Except, :^) That's me, smiling. Man o manischevitz, I hope she gets in. Atta gal, Sarah!
Those who like Palin and who also pray, pray for her and her family's health, healing, safety, reslience, and energy!
All I can do is smile, especially after the great "tease" from Clairity! {^)
Megyn Kelly. There’s a thread on this from yesterday:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2776033/posts
Excellent video.
You the man, Sarah! You. The. Man.
:)
Hon, that’s not Laura Ingram. And it’s Ingraham.
Now, Sarah either still hasn't decided, based on Sarah's own words, and can thus properly be described as indecisive; or she just lied on national TV.
I'm a Sarah Palin supporter and while I don't know whether Palin is running or not (but I hope that she will) I don't care for some of the pro-Perry comments that condescendingly sniff that Sarah Palin has to stand back and accept the role they would assign her as a cheerleader for the real candidate, Rick Perry, and basically 'wait her turn' (2016) or gain 'experience', etc. This is old-school, 'establishment' thinking. Sarah Palin has proven herself already and serving as a senator for six years or whatever role her detractors (who always state that they' love' Sarah Palin...but, but...) deem sufficient to make her qualified to run for president certainly won't appease the left or those on the right who simply cannot accept her as president.
In a Palin/Perry match-up, they both have their strengths and weaknesses but for me, Sarah Palin is a person that I won't worry about betraying conservative values, once in office. I'm not claiming that Rick Perry is a RINO or a fraud because I don't believe he is either, but I feel more secure about Sarah Palin's commitment to conservative principles. If Palin runs for the Republican presidential nomination she'll be judged by Republican primary voters on her merits, which I believe are quite good. If she doesn't run, I doubt she'll endorse any GOP candidate but will support the party nominee, although if that were Romney, her support, like mine, would be mostly token. In any case, I believe that Sarah Palin will remain an asset to the Republican party and, perhaps, it's vehicle to regain the presidency in 2012.
She certainly didn’t take the swing at Perry that you would expect of her if she was trying to run against him. And I think we now have an example of whom she meant when she attacks crony capitalism.
Reflected starlight is dim and lacks heat
Palin is graceful and doesn’t insult her fellow GOP candidates, but she did mark him down severely in her own subtile way.
This is not a good review on Perry, or his crude delivery, merely a thumbs up on the topic.