Posted on 09/09/2011 3:47:14 PM PDT by SanFranDan
There is several post on this thread directly related to the women, none of which mention the poor kid as I did not, now go jump their ceases as well.
Sorry, but you are preaching to the choir. Child abusers should never survive incarceration. Period. They are liars and will never, ever change. The best thing for this “mother” is to die. Soon.
Just sayin’...
None of them were political in nature nor attempted to drag a candidate’s name onto the thread.
Hey if she was in Tennessee Mommy would have state social workers from DCS already planning for the future happy mother and child reunification. If not reunified mother would be in childs life till age 18. No I'm not being sarcastic.
Women who abuse their children should be first sterilised so they do not have any more.
It always amazes me that people can harm their own kids.
Now: I am not talking about a spanking, I am talking about beatings. What is wrong with someone who would beat a 2 year old unconscious. That person should be locked away forever. They are too repugnant to be out in society passing out sex and breeding more children to abuse.That is why I say sterilisation is paramnout.
Are we talking Sodom -OR- Gormorrah here?...
I can’t believe I just read that... in a thread like this.
You really are an obsessed, jaundiced creep.
Dork.
You know thia because you have met them personally? (Just axin')
You sir...are absolutely demented
Family values, Rio Grande....
From KDFW:
The couple's three other children, ages 1 through 7, were unharmed.
I’m very curious (please don’t misunderstand this) as to what you both think should happen to this woman...
“Kill the filth, and be done with it”
She should be suffer the same punishment as that which she deemed suitable for a child.
No kidding!
Gee, well thanks for pointing that out. Seems maybe the guys would jump in there and do something, ya think? BTW, from whence did you get that information that all angels are male?????
The Bible does not necessarily support the idea of angels being male or female. Whenever gender is specifically “assigned” to an angel in Scripture, it is male (Genesis 19:10-12; Revelation 7:2; 8:3; 10:7). However, this does not necessarily indicate that angels are male. Matthew 22:30 seems to indicate that angels are “sexless,” without gender: “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.” If angels do not procreate, there is no need for gender, at least not in the sense of human gender distinctions. In a similar manner, God always refers to Himself in masculine language, although God is neither male nor female. God uses masculine language when He speaks of Himself because it more adequately describes who He is and what He does, especially in the patriarchal cultures in which the Bible was written. If angels do have a gender in some form, Scripture would indicate that they are predominately or universally male. It is more likely that angels are genderless, just as God is, and that masculine language is used to describe them and their role in serving God.
So, next up - how many can dance on the head of a pin???
So in that context females are nurturing while males are warriors. When was the last time you saw a depiction of a male angel nurturing an injured infant??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.