Posted on 09/08/2011 6:34:20 AM PDT by fwdude
Gay men will be able to give blood as long as they haven't had sex for 12 months, the Government announced today, overturning a lifetime ban brought in due to the spread of HIV and Aids.
The move came in response to new scientific evidence that found a lifetime ban was an unnecessary safety precaution.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Don’t expect this new, lax restriction to be satisfactory for the homos, they will scream that they are still not being treated “equally.” One commentor at the end of the article said he would lie because he is in a “monogamous” relationship.
I’ve got a stream flooding through my yard, it’s taking away everything the hurricane didn’t.
Gee, I needed this laugh this morning.
The leftist elites in Washington are trying to “patttern” the U.S. after the flawwed government we overthrew in the 1700s.
Therefore I expect B.O. and his bastards to try and copy this idiotic decision.
So what are they going to have to show for proof - a punchcard for every time they have been punched?
Sodomites will lie about virtually anything when it suits their purposes. They will certainly lie about this, and people will develop serious illnesses or die as a result.
"He said: 'Although the new policy is a big improvement on the existing discriminatory rules, a 12-month ban is still excessive and unjustified.'"
I'd like to inject this piece of excrement with a syringe of HIV blood.
So they load the gun and point it at their head with the Islamic immigration and now they try to permanently wipe out the gene pool.
No sex for a year. Sure like that will happen just so they can give blood.
My question is ‘why’? Isn’t there enough people that can give?
Do they pay money to give? Are they selling to other countries?
or another way to get rid of those climate changing humans.
I don’t get this. Are gays in the UK registered as such? How the hell would anyone know a donor is gay? And isn’t donated blood screened for aids anyway?
You could be having wildfires destroying your house during the unprecedented drought like we are having here in Texas. Count your blessings.
isn’t this what John F’n Kerry is pushing for here in the US?
realistically, the screening is simply a bunch of questions anyways...if theyre not testing the blood, shame on em...
Upon reading the headline I instantly wondered about International Red Cross. I don’t know how that works relative to blood transfers internationally.
Perhaps somebody could clue us on the matter.
According to the article, several other countries, including Japan, Australia and Sweden, already have this one-year policy in place.
Canada to follow soon?
Of course, people can lie. But they’d be lying. And they’ll have to lie directly in the face of donation personnel. That’s the point. Some will have enough moral fiber left in them to tell the truth or not donate at all. It’s a screen, which is not foolproof, but has some positive effect anyway.
Well, let’s see: homosexuals comprise about 1 to 2 percent of the population. Out of that 1 to 2 percent, what percent do we suppose hasn’t had sex for a year?
They probably do test the blood, but the test doesn’t always detect the virus if the donor was only recently infected. There was talk a while back of loosening the standards in the US as well. Bad news for anyone who might need a blood transfusion.
Bank your own blood, otherwise it’s always a crapshoot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.