Is this question a litmus test for those who wish to cut entitlements? ( Clue: The question was repeated ten minutes later on the same program and Senator Orin Hatch replied: " I would never call it a Ponzi Scheme.") What say you?
1 posted on
09/08/2011 6:23:45 AM PDT by
Graewoulf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Graewoulf
Look up the definition of “Ponzi Scheme” and tell me how it is NOT one.
2 posted on
09/08/2011 6:24:49 AM PDT by
Grunthor
To: Graewoulf
Beck is defending Perry’s response re: social security last night...ponzi scheme...deal with it.
3 posted on
09/08/2011 6:26:59 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Graewoulf
Got to hand it to Rick Perry for being bold enough to bring it up!
4 posted on
09/08/2011 6:27:01 AM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Graewoulf
—it is worse than a “Ponzi” scheme because it is collected at the point of the government gun—Ponzi schemes are voluntary scams, invested in by fools-—
8 posted on
09/08/2011 6:27:44 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: Graewoulf
Of course it is. The problem for the “progressives” is that THEY killed the scheme by aborting 50 million contributors.
As with all ponzi schemes it collapses when you lose new suckers to invest.
Classic Ponzi scheme.
9 posted on
09/08/2011 6:29:01 AM PDT by
Marty62
(Marty60)
To: Graewoulf
forget the Criminal elements, SS depends on an ever expanding group of new members to pay out to the old members. Problem is demographically there is not an ever expanding base comming down the age line. Add in 25% teenage unemployment amoung the reduced population base, and you have a “collapsed” pyramid scheme.
12 posted on
09/08/2011 6:29:28 AM PDT by
swamprebel
( proud SOB!)
To: Graewoulf
Hey Tommy... What’s the current account balance in the Social Security “lockbox”, you ignorant, socialist-loving a$$ clown.
13 posted on
09/08/2011 6:29:50 AM PDT by
Common Sense 101
(Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
To: Graewoulf
Social security is a government run PONZI scheme with a printing press! Carlo Ponzi didn’t have one of those and as faras I know he didn’t FORCE his victims in either!
14 posted on
09/08/2011 6:31:27 AM PDT by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: Graewoulf
It’s every bit a Ponzi Scheme, but most politicians don’t want to be associated with a negative discussion of Social Security for fear of the lie machine the Democrats keep so well lubricated, maintained, and functioning.
15 posted on
09/08/2011 6:31:27 AM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: Graewoulf
It has been a PONZI SCHEME since day one. SS was designed for the majority to die before receiving any benefits. As life expectancy rose the politicians kept raising the age one could put in for benefits.
They want to raise the age again.
16 posted on
09/08/2011 6:31:28 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(To the idiots that didn't believe us about ZERO: Hope you enjoy your less than a dollar in change.)
To: Graewoulf
Republicans need to hit a few definite points when discussing this topic:
1) No one is going to wave a wand and make Social Security disappear overnight, reducing all of our seniors to abject poverty.
2) People who are close to retirement are not going to be abandoned.
3) Young people will be transitioned to something that is sustainable.
Yes, Social Security is a ponzi scheme. It had to fail sometime: that's what ponzi schemes do. We can recognize that it was a terrible program, while still aknowledging that we have a commitment to some people. No one is going to just throw them all under the bus.
17 posted on
09/08/2011 6:32:11 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: Graewoulf
It is, more or less, a Ponzi Scheme," but Perry could have made his point a lot better last night by showing the audience why it was so, rather than just telling the audience it was so. Show, don't tell.
To: Graewoulf
Of course SS is a Ponzi scheme and this shows the boldness of Perry to call a spade a spade. The problem is the country is likely to reject the truth but someone had to say it.
To: Graewoulf
Kudos to Santelli.
Again!
20 posted on
09/08/2011 6:34:13 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Graewoulf
21 posted on
09/08/2011 6:35:15 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: Graewoulf
Of course it is. The Government is doing the exact same thing Bernie Madoff is in prison for.
26 posted on
09/08/2011 6:38:09 AM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: Graewoulf
Santelli was brilliant. Friedman was moronic and shocked that his put down to Santelli was return with full force and more.
To: Graewoulf
It is worse than a Ponzi scheme. Nobody is forced to invest in a Ponzi scheme, and in most cases, greed leads most investors/victims to invest in deals that clearly seem dodgy.
With Social Security we have no choice.
To: Graewoulf
30 posted on
09/08/2011 6:40:23 AM PDT by
kabar
To: Graewoulf
32 posted on
09/08/2011 6:41:55 AM PDT by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson