Skip to comments.
NASA: Space station may be evacuated by late Nov.
AP via Yahoo! News ^
| 29 August 2011
| Marcia Dunn
Posted on 08/29/2011 9:27:48 AM PDT by magellan
NASA says astronauts may need to abandon the International Space Station this fall.
If Russian Soyuz rockets remain grounded beyond mid-November, there will be no way to launch new crews before the current residents are supposed to leave.
A Russian supply ship was destroyed during liftoff last week. The rocket is similar to what's used to launch astronauts.
NASA space station program manager Mike Suffredini said Monday that flight controllers could keep a deserted space station operating indefinitely.
(Excerpt) Read more at old.news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; obama; spaceshuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Unbelievable. This is what happens when you shut down the Space Shuttle program, cancel the Orion/Ares crew vehicle, and put all of your eggs into the Russian Soyuz basket.
Fire Charles Bolden now!
1
posted on
08/29/2011 9:27:54 AM PDT
by
magellan
To: magellan
2
posted on
08/29/2011 9:29:28 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
To: magellan
>>>>>Fire Charles Bolden now!Just fire Obama.
3
posted on
08/29/2011 9:31:00 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: magellan
Can’t we sell it to the Chinese or something? Recoup some of the billions?
4
posted on
08/29/2011 9:31:32 AM PDT
by
neodad
To: magellan
Hmmmm, sounds like more meat for the conspiracy theorists...
5
posted on
08/29/2011 9:32:15 AM PDT
by
Errant
To: KevinDavis
6
posted on
08/29/2011 9:32:21 AM PDT
by
neodad
To: magellan
Real smart. All those years building the thing, billions spent, lives lost, and now they’re going to abandon it? Really, really smart planning there, geniuses.
7
posted on
08/29/2011 9:32:44 AM PDT
by
chimera
To: magellan
NASA used to be bold and innovative, now its just another politicized government agency. If this proves to be accurate they should halt the moth-balling now if for no other reason other than to have a method of getting the residents of ISS safely home.
9
posted on
08/29/2011 9:34:27 AM PDT
by
evets
(beer)
To: Reagan Man
Amen. These decisions are his.
10
posted on
08/29/2011 9:34:39 AM PDT
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: neodad
Cant we sell it to the Chinese or something? Recoup some of the billions?
We don't own all of it. But I actually wouldn't be adverse to selling our interest to China. The ISS is a dead end in space and if we can get any of our money back out of the project I would take it. We can't get there so there is no advantage to keeping it. So we may as well get anything back that we can.
11
posted on
08/29/2011 9:34:39 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Spaghetti Man
But at least NASA has a great new mission of Muslim Outreach (thanks to Barack HUSSEIN Obama)
12
posted on
08/29/2011 9:35:24 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
To: magellan
So how do they get down? Jump? If the rockets are grounded. Do they have a craft docked to the station they can come home in?
13
posted on
08/29/2011 9:35:30 AM PDT
by
SolidRedState
(I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
To: magellan
The shuttle was planned for shut down during the Bush administration. And the Orion/Aries manned missions were, at best, 5 years away. More likely 8 to 10 years given NASA's track record. So what was Bolden supposed to do about it?
We're at the point now where private industry should be picking up the slack in the space program. They can do the job quicker and more cost effectively than NASA can. Government should limit itself to doing whatever it can to encourage private industry.
14
posted on
08/29/2011 9:39:25 AM PDT
by
SoJoCo
To: magellan
Gee, that didn’t take long.
15
posted on
08/29/2011 9:41:22 AM PDT
by
PilotDave
(No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
To: magellan
There’s plenty of blame to shove . . .
anyway . . .
However . . . I don’t for a microsecond
believe that things are as the MSM are painting them.
Lots of things are not as they seem.
The critical issues probably have NOTHING to do with what’s ascribed as the causes.
16
posted on
08/29/2011 9:41:31 AM PDT
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: magellan
Didn't Obama promote himself as the "science" presidential candidate?
FAIL
17
posted on
08/29/2011 9:43:56 AM PDT
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: SoJoCo
Don’t you mean what was Obama supposed to do about it? That’s who you’re actually defending here, correct?
18
posted on
08/29/2011 9:44:05 AM PDT
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: Quix
“There are thirty-two ways to write a story, and I’ve used every one, but there is only one plot — things are not as they seem.” — Jim Thompson
19
posted on
08/29/2011 9:45:46 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: SolidRedState
They have a Soyuz capsule at the ISS as an emergency lifeboat.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson