Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Still Waiting for Sarah
The American Spectator ^ | 8/22/2011 | Robert Stacy McCain

Posted on 08/22/2011 4:05:38 AM PDT by BfloGuy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Kharis13
Palin/Perry

I can see neither of them taking the second spot. They both have too big a personalities for that. It'll be all or nothing. IMO

61 posted on 08/22/2011 7:22:55 AM PDT by Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: littlesorrel; Coldwater Creek; All

“Strong Man!! When Sarah was attacked from all sides none of the Republican candidates came to her support. I wouldn’t want any of them in a fox hole with me. Sarah only.”

Damn Straight!!!, when no one was speaking out in the face of our Constitution being trashed by this fascist regime, Sarah spoke up and defended our freedoms. I want someone who cares as much as I do about this country and Sarah Palin does. No one else spoke up from the Republican side...gutless worms all.

When she was accused of murder ala AZ, where where the defenders from the Republican side??? NONE of the current GOP contenders spoke up...not a damn one. “Oh it was thought, let’s be prudent and stay quiet.”

NO!!! Not a one of these current contenders, none of the Pubbie establishment spoke up.

By GOD give me someone with a FIGHTING JUNKYARD DOG attitude to defend my American liberities...Someone who knows what the risks are and where we are in history, because some apparently don’t know or don’t care.

Some may opt out to vote for Palin in the primaries, so be it, but as for me and my house GIVE ME PALIN ALL THE WAY!!!


62 posted on 08/22/2011 8:06:35 AM PDT by el_texicano (Extremism in the face of tyranny is no fault, Moderation in the face of evil, no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ontap

“doing something that intentionally skews the results may not always be illegal but it is never really honest.”

I see your point, but to play Devil’s advocate, one could also characterize get-out-the-vote efforts, negative advertising or other tried-and-true tactics to win an election as “skewing” the results that otherwise would occur. I don’t view those as “dishonest”: just playing the game by the rules set by others etc.

That said, I can understand your point that if public polling shows single-digit support, that is a better reflection of “true” voter sentiment than the results of a straw poll where the rules allow multiple voting. But electoral returns do not always follow the polls either and to do the degree they deviate, it could be because of some of the tried-and-true tactics I just cited. Given that no other candidates are insisting that their supporters limit themselves to one vote where multiple votes are legal, I would say Ron Paul would be shooting himself in the foot by unilaterally taking the high road on this issue.


63 posted on 08/22/2011 8:10:23 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Amen brother!

Add Michele Bachmann and Nikki Haley to that list of no-show defenders that were willing have her help when it was needed but hid when honor demanded that they defend her. Titanium spine my ass!

Your comments bear repeating.
______________________________

?Strong Man!! When Sarah was attacked from all sides none of the Republican candidates came to her support. I wouldn?t want any of them in a fox hole with me. Sarah only.?

Damn Straight!!!, when no one was speaking out in the face of our Constitution being trashed by this fascist regime, Sarah spoke up and defended our freedoms. I want someone who cares as much as I do about this country and Sarah Palin does. No one else spoke up from the Republican side...gutless worms all.

When she was accused of murder ala AZ, where where the defenders from the Republican side??? NONE of the current GOP contenders spoke up...not a damn one. ?Oh it was thought, let?s be prudent and stay quiet.?

NO!!! Not a one of these current contenders, none of the Pubbie establishment spoke up.

By GOD give me someone with a FIGHTING JUNKYARD DOG attitude to defend my American liberities...Someone who knows what the risks are and where we are in history, because some apparently don?t know or don?t care.

Some may opt out to vote for Palin in the primaries, so be it, but as for me and my house GIVE ME PALIN ALL THE WAY!!!


64 posted on 08/22/2011 8:23:39 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
How can Trademark announce on September 3rd when she has a "pay-to-see" event set for October?

http://www.familyarena.com/events-details.php?name=Sarah%20Palin%20and%20Glenn%20Beck

What political candidate charges people to see him/her?

65 posted on 08/22/2011 8:49:04 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
What political candidate charges people to see him/her?

Well, the Palinistas are always claiming that Palin(™) does things her way. ;)

66 posted on 08/22/2011 8:58:44 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
It's a smart thing you put the trademark symbol next to Palin's name in your post. Otherwise she might have sued, you know.

Because the possibility of some twisted entrepreneur using Palin's image and name as the brand for "toys" of dubious utility is just an obvious ruse for her trademarking her name. Her whole life history, everything about the way she has lived -- why, she's just a political reincarnation of Peggy Hopkins Joyce! -- confirms that the only reason she would trademark her name is for money, money, money, money.

/s

Palin detractors are so devious and so desperate!

67 posted on 08/22/2011 9:16:43 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Thanks for the ping.


68 posted on 08/22/2011 9:48:54 AM PDT by GOPJ (126 people were indicted for being terrorists in the last two years. Every one of them was Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek
Mrs. Palin should stick to what she does very well, and that is Kingmaking.

Sarah Palin should stick to what she does best and that is serving the people and governing against the wishes of the political establishment elite. President Palin will be a president of the people.

69 posted on 08/22/2011 10:00:42 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Romney only hope is that Palin and Perry split the conservative vote and he able to steal the nomination.

Oh I'm sure Sarah Palin has taken that all into account before deciding if she will announce. The last thing Sarah Palin would want to be known as is the spoiler of 2012.

70 posted on 08/22/2011 11:35:10 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

“Media doesn’t even go near Democrat gaffes”

If by chance they do mention it, it’s a short blurb on only one network. It’s as if the lib networks got together and drew straws to see which one would report it.


71 posted on 08/22/2011 4:36:25 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia (I'm believing...Sarah 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

72 posted on 08/22/2011 4:45:28 PM PDT by tomkat (sic semper tyrranis .. literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
True, but it is still a gamble on her part.
73 posted on 08/23/2011 1:52:37 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I’m sticking with Bachmann for now. The 3rd will be the do or die date for Palin.

Says who? That statement is so reflective of the instant gratification society that we live in today. When we don't get what we want when we want it, we pout like five year olds.

Fact is, politically speaking, this is the "stupid season". Look around you. Nothing good comes from running for president in the dog days of summer months before the first meaningful event (Iowa caucus). Nobody but a few political junkies are paying much attention. Meanwhile, all the media seems interested in doing right now is covering the gaffes...

"Happy Birthday Elvis!" Quite possible the Bachmann campaign will never recover from that one. Will anybody remember anything else Michelle Bachmann said or did this summer?

Palin is going to get into this race in her own good time. I give her credit for sitting out the "stupid season."

74 posted on 08/23/2011 2:19:13 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor; el_texicano
Well said, both of you. For topics related to your statements, read:

Democrats and Media are not Sarah Palin’s Biggest Problem

and

How to Defeat Sarah Palin

75 posted on 08/23/2011 3:14:07 AM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DrC

I agree, however Paul supporters take this to a much higher level. Just consider how long he has been in the spot light and the relatively small amount of support he actually garners. I like most of what he stands for but he is not a serious contender for anything other than a congressman.


76 posted on 08/23/2011 8:51:49 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jimjohn; All

Yes, I agree. The worst enemies to have are the ones who would stab you in the back and undermine you at every turn.

Damn the Republican establishment. Damn them all to hell.

We need to take over the Republican party and kick the Republican establishments worthless butts out and expose them for what they are: turncoats.


77 posted on 08/23/2011 9:06:36 AM PDT by el_texicano (Extremism in the face of tyranny is no fault, Moderation in the face of evil, no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson