Skip to comments.
Darrell Issa Sticks It to the Times
Powerline ^
| August 19, 2011
| by John Hinderacker
Posted on 08/19/2011 7:00:21 PM PDT by library user
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: library user
watching sean’s 1 hour show now.
2
posted on
08/19/2011 7:11:35 PM PDT
by
ken21
(ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
To: library user
just hope Issa keeps pouring it on and does not let up rather than forgetting about it after this....
3
posted on
08/19/2011 7:12:00 PM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
To: library user
The New York
Times has delivered one more lie to their audience.
Because that is what their audience wants to hear.
A diet of lies: It's the only way the left can survive.
4
posted on
08/19/2011 7:14:20 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
To: library user
As it has done many times before the NYT has violated the public trust by reporting false news stories.
because of our 1st Amendment protecting the freedom of the press they can't (and shouldn't) be shut down. But, we can get very, very busy in making them the "Onion" of the media and ridicule the NYT in every way possible. They should be the laughing stock of every journalism school and everyone who believes in delivering unbiased information to the public.
5
posted on
08/19/2011 7:29:24 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(If the government was in charge of the desert , we'd soon have a shortage of sand.)
To: library user
Why does it seem like Darrell Issa and Chuck Grassley are the only ones doing any investigating of the most corrupt administration in America’s history?
6
posted on
08/19/2011 7:33:38 PM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: library user
Why can’t the New York Times ever report a story straight? Why do the paper’s reporters and editors have to just make stuff up to advance their political agenda? Maybe the paper’s Public Editor will try to answer these questions.LMAO!!
Yeah, I'll wait for the New York Times' "Public Editor" to answer these questions! HAA-HAA-hahaha..!
To: library user
Eric Lichtblau, traitor.
To: library user
9
posted on
08/19/2011 7:48:24 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: library user
The “White House Insider” guy said Issa was going to be digging deep and that we should expect a negative media blitz against him. Now it is happening. I swear, that guy is for real.
Google Ulsterman White House Insider if you have not read his reports. He is a modern day Deep Throat.
10
posted on
08/19/2011 7:56:00 PM PDT
by
Semper911
(When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
To: library user
Daily Newspapers are slowing dying off. (Thanks to a gazillion cable news networks and the internet.) I’ll be glad when this rag dies and get a pauper’s burial.
11
posted on
08/19/2011 8:07:30 PM PDT
by
no dems
(No matter who it might be, when I find out a person is a Democrat, I lose respect for them.)
To: library user
Sadly to say, somewhere in The Administration, a file is being accumulated for Darrell Issa.
12
posted on
08/19/2011 8:08:54 PM PDT
by
oyez
( America is being pimped.)
To: library user
The New York Times: Doing whatever it takes to keep the liberal bubble inflated.
13
posted on
08/19/2011 8:11:15 PM PDT
by
TChad
To: library user
Brilliant reporting by Powerline and John Hinderacker. Unfortunately the NYSlimes already got Issa’s picture on the front page with an erroneous headline. The damage is done and that’s what that journolist and the Slimes were banking on... Issa should take them to the cleaners.
14
posted on
08/19/2011 8:13:19 PM PDT
by
bronxville
(Sarah will be the first American female president.)
To: library user
I hope Issa is mad——good and mad, I hope he is so mad he is determined to get Barrack Hussein Obama charged as an accessory in the murder of a Border Patrol Agent.
15
posted on
08/19/2011 8:16:09 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: library user
I believe that to prove actionable slander public officials must prove gross negligence and/or malice of intent. This case is a clear example of both. Issa should sue the NY Times for several hundred million dollars and then begin a process of discovery to obtain the release of the NY Times's internal documents.
Let the slimeballs at the NY Times explain the article to a jury and/or a judge. Issa could end up owning the NY Times.
To: library user; All
17
posted on
08/19/2011 8:43:07 PM PDT
by
patriot08
(TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
To: library user
This is a clear and unambiguous case of presstitution.
18
posted on
08/19/2011 8:51:09 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles.)
To: library user
Thing is, millions of idiotic voters will believe what the Slimes said, and the Slimes’ editors know it.
Goebels wouldn’t be proud. He’d be jealous.
19
posted on
08/19/2011 9:13:39 PM PDT
by
piytar
(The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
To: Venturer
“I hope Issa is mad——good and mad, I hope he is so mad he is determined to get Barrack Hussein Obama charged as an accessory in the murder of a Border Patrol Agent.”
Now you’re talking. I’d settle for getting Holder The Anti-Christ, but the Usurper’s head would obviously be sweeter.
20
posted on
08/19/2011 9:41:45 PM PDT
by
pghoilman
(Earth First. We'll drill the rest of the galaxy later.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson