Skip to comments.
Entire U.S. Stealth Fighter Fleet Grounded
http://www.extremeconservatives.com/2011/08/entire-u-s-stealth-fighter-fleet-grounded/ ^
Posted on 08/10/2011 3:16:24 PM PDT by chessplayer
In past few decades, the U.S. Air Force has spent untold billions researching and developing a family of stealth fighter jets that are supposed to be generations ahead of any dogfighters in the sky.
But after building more than 170 F-22 Raptors and a handful of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, not a single one is available for service. The Air Force currently has zero flyable stealth fighters. None.
(Excerpt) Read more at extremeconservatives.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: f22; f35; jointstrikefighter; jsf; lockheed; lockheedmartin; oldnews; raptor; sourcetitlenoturl; stealth; stealthfighterjets; stealthfighters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: tet68
F-117’s are not flying, they retired them a couple of years back.
To: chessplayer
Reminds me of the old cold war air force joke that went something like this:
“In the future, the USA will develop a multi-role fighter/bomber that will single-handedly be able to defeat the entire Soviet Block Air Force... and we will only be able to afford ONE of them!”
22
posted on
08/10/2011 4:37:19 PM PDT
by
SDShack
(0zer0care = "The Final Solution" - Socialized Euthanasia Healthcare)
To: tet68
>>>>>>>Headline not exactly correct, F-117s and B-2 bombers still flying.<<<<<<<
Nighthawk is retired owing to Bent One.
23
posted on
08/10/2011 4:43:37 PM PDT
by
DTA
(U.S. Centcom vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
To: SDShack
"Reminds me of the old cold war air force joke that went something like this: In the future, the USA will develop a multi-role fighter/bomber that will single-handedly be able to defeat the entire Soviet Block Air Force... and we will only be able to afford ONE of them!"
And like the current defenders of the F-22 program, they'll tell us that one's enough, because it'll beat everything else in the world with one hand tied behind the pilot's back.
Numbers aren't everything, but they definitely count in war.
24
posted on
08/10/2011 4:50:44 PM PDT
by
DesScorp
25
posted on
08/10/2011 5:09:53 PM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
To: chessplayer
Need to give enough time for Chinese to catch up er copy enough of the hardware
26
posted on
08/10/2011 5:50:05 PM PDT
by
Flavius
(What hopes for victory, Gaius Crastinus? What grounds for encouragement ?)
To: chessplayer
27
posted on
08/10/2011 7:36:01 PM PDT
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: SZonian
thanks for all of your service and hard work!!
Those must have been some “interesting times” during DS....
28
posted on
08/11/2011 4:42:59 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(9 year cancer survivor (ME) this month - last surgery Aug. 2002)
To: chessplayer
The USSR had it right in the Cold War. Their planes were not as technologically advanced as ours, but they made up for it with overwhelming numbers of them.The Russians also expected that they'd take HUGE losses against western airforces. This is another reason that they designed things to be cheap. Another consequence was that their pilots didn't get much actual stick-time. Training was lower.
Russian military hardware was "rugged" but that doesn't mean that the maintenance hours per flight hour were any better.
29
posted on
08/22/2011 12:54:14 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
(You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
To: steve86
Yea....and one of them has been inspected by the Chinese now...
30
posted on
08/22/2011 1:07:50 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson