Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is something in this article with a disconsonant ring to me. I heartily blame Obama for the economic malaise that inevitably accompanies a clearly anti-business administration. However, this author implies that he is somehow behind the outbreak of the violence. He has not uttered a word of condemnation, (unlike Mayor Nutter in Philly) but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.


12 posted on 08/10/2011 1:27:56 AM PDT by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Explorer89

The matter is not that Obama is the ‘orchestrator’.

The matter is that Obama is evil. As president, and one with an heroic superstar image to his fans, he gives permission to every lost soul to embrace evil.

If the president were not evil, those lost souls might be led in a better direction by one of any number of thousands of other leaders and role models in our society.

To understand what I’m saying, you need to believe in evil. If you don’t think it exists, and everything is just rational decisions or psychological motivations, then of course it would be silly to think one person could have this influence. How many examples in history that seemed great, noble leaders at the beginning?


21 posted on 08/10/2011 1:43:00 AM PDT by baa39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.

I can.
And the result is the same whether done by design or out of ignorance.

Ever spent any real time in DC? The proportion of "his people" who hold non-elective government jobs is several times their representation in the metropolitan population, always has been, but the imbalace increased significantly beginning in January, 2009.
Plus there is his (personal) "National Army" that he proposed soon after taking office. Guess the traditional National Guard from all states just wouldn't do.

He has st racial relations back far beyond 1964, with the childish zeal of a wimp who discovered suddenly that he can act like a bully with impunity.

Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

22 posted on 08/10/2011 1:46:52 AM PDT by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

“....but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.”

This is classic “Destabilization.” Riots; coddling terrorists with show trials; freeing criminals; legalizing voter intimidation (Black Panthers outside Philly polling station); ordering ATF to arm drug cartels with semi-auto riles; SEIU mobs attacking Tea Parties and town halls; busloads of ACORN/SEIU protesting outside homes of CEO’s.

This is Phase 2 of the Communist/Marxist program.

Best explained by this KGB defector (VIDEO HERE):

http://bravenewcommie.wordpress.com/2010/03/28/kgb-defector-obama-agenda-is-pure-marxist/


24 posted on 08/10/2011 1:49:21 AM PDT by LyinLibs (All moslems are somewhere on the killing-you spectrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

Hint: It started with the sudden drop of charges against the Black Panthers in the voter intimidation case, where it was a slam dunk conviction and has gone on through the deliberate blindness of the DOJ towards crimes committed by ‘people of color’ against whites and Asians.

They got the message that they don’t need to worry about getting busted.


26 posted on 08/10/2011 1:52:44 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
There is something in this article with a disconsonant ring to me.

"Disconsonant" is evidently a neologism. The Merriam Webster site wants to know where you heard it. It occurs to me that it's a transmogrification ( look it up ) of "cognitive dissonance".

Anyway, the disconsonant ring to me was the entire narrative of events, in particular the writer's concern that the kids would be scarred with racist leanings, and the mild tone of his remonstrances with "Gail". I would be out of my mind.

29 posted on 08/10/2011 1:56:00 AM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

0bama 2012 campaign strategy: Create civil unrest, declare martial law, suspend the elections.


37 posted on 08/10/2011 2:34:52 AM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (Revive the 10th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
>. . . [0] has not uttered a word of condemnation, (unlike Mayor Nutter in Philly) but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.

0's 'civil' comments:

If they bring a knife, we bring a gun.

Get in their faces.

Get in the streets and get busy.

The Philadelphia police behaved 'stupidly'.

The man is one continuous drone of aggressive 'street-thug' posturing from a pampered poseur.

As soon as 0 was elected, relations between the races took a nose dive -- African-Americans across the U.S. took his election as a sign that it was time for them to, "get theirs."

He has done NOTHING to try to lead toward a united country -- he has only used divisive language.

Yes, 0 is definitely behind the outbreaks in violence.

The only thing truly unknown is whether his inciting of it is by design or through incompetence.

50 posted on 08/10/2011 3:16:00 AM PDT by Quiller (When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

Ahhhhh, you think the communist community organizer occupying the White House doesn’t have minions assisting this stuff on social networks?


53 posted on 08/10/2011 3:21:38 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
However, this author implies that he is somehow behind the outbreak of the violence. He has not uttered a word of condemnation, (unlike Mayor Nutter in Philly) but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.

Come again?

Remember the Obama Justice Department?

64 posted on 08/10/2011 3:54:23 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
You might not like/want to think so, but regardless any current 'nice guy' world view you may harbor, the marxist scum on the left is at War with YOU and yours !

Until such time as conservatives truly understand that fact, we will continue to be demonized and assaulted.


67 posted on 08/10/2011 4:03:53 AM PDT by tomkat (Sarah '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

Of course not.

Obammie and his commies can work very covertly.

It is the Obama’s of the world that have brainwashed black youth into believing they are victims of capitalism, victims of the whites, victims of America.

It is the Obama’s of the world that shout through the media that the violent criminals that attack whites at a fair are innocent and we had it coming.

It is the Obama’s of the world that talk about “typical white people.”

It’s the Obama’s of the world who, when a white cop is doing his job and arrests a black man who refuses to comply with an officer’s demands when there has been a report of a break-in, automatically calls that officer stupid and implies that he is a racist.

No, you can’t point the finger directly at Obama. That’s the way they want it. They stir up the rats with a secret hand and then they claim the authority to solve the problem and end the violence.

Obama is, in fact, directly responsible for all of this.


71 posted on 08/10/2011 4:07:50 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
There is something in this article with a disconsonant ring to me. I heartily blame Obama for the economic malaise that inevitably accompanies a clearly anti-business administration. However, this author implies that he is somehow behind the outbreak of the violence. He has not uttered a word of condemnation, (unlike Mayor Nutter in Philly) but I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.

I don't think the article is saying that 0bama is "behind" all of this, more like he's a symptom. Think of it this way, let's say you're deciding on a neighborhood to relocate into. You drive through an area and the downtown center is covered in graffiti, there are lots of pawn shops ,liquor stores and those check cashing and payday loan shops. Unless you're on a real tight budget you'll continue looking. Why? because inside you know the area is a scum pit.

Now, did the graffiti, seedy shops and dirt cause it to be a scum pit? No, but all that's a symptom that the people who live there don't really care.

The same is true of 0bama. Did he necessarily cause all the problems mentioned in the article? No. He is a symptom that the majority of the electorate looks to government for a free ride and as a result when that free ride is interrupted or it isn't enough they will take what they want.

76 posted on 08/10/2011 4:17:40 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
I cannot view this a some sort of assault orchestrated by Obama.

I would agree, the same would be happening under any other president regardless of party. The moral fabric that holds our society together is very slowly unraveling......

80 posted on 08/10/2011 4:28:22 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (You can't forfeit the game Chuck! If you go home you forfeit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

While I agree that the O-hole has not overtly stated his approval of these “flash robs”, it is important to note his participation by implying the “rich and companies are evil”, therefore suggesting they are undeserving of their wealth or material goods. This assertion, combined with the empty suit’s demand for “economic justice”, enable the welfare state parasites to justify their actions against these people and businesses. Think of it as nothing more than the culmination of 50 years of constant “entitlement indoctrination” by the DNC leftists.


88 posted on 08/10/2011 4:48:22 AM PDT by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
Agitators don't orchestrate, they just stir up emotions and rage.

Obama isn't directly involved with flash mob violence, he doesn't have to be. Agitators work behind the scenes. That said, he is most assuredly a catalyst.

Case in point: the running trail in my town winds down through what used to be a friendly "minority" neighborhood. For years, town folks and college students (the trail connects a local college to the town center) thought nothing of traveling that path.

However, immediately after the election of Obama, there was a change that everyone noticed and commented on. That neighborhood took on a surly attitude. Young thugs gather on the trail in that neighborhood and glared at anyone that would pass. Soon runners and bikers and walkers were afraid to travel that route. That section of the trail, which is visible when traveling by car, is now devoid of town folks and littered with trash.

125 posted on 08/10/2011 7:14:30 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
Robin answers your question:

"But why?" Gail asked me plaintively. "Why is this [violence] happening now?"

"It's Obama," I explained. "It's what I told you a few years ago. This is what happens when you put someone in power like Obama. Something spreads, like a virus. It's subtle; it's almost invisible. But it poisons one person, and then another and another, until soon the whole country is corrupted.

It's the same as when oral sex spread to our 12 and 13 year olds under Billy Jeff's tutelage. His scandalous behavior set the national tone.

Leadership, and especially corruption and rotten "leadership," starts at the top. We are suffering from years of the community organizer exhorting us to "get in their faces" and "bring a gun to the fight."

133 posted on 08/10/2011 7:44:14 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

I remember when Obama was pushing through Obamacare, he got furious at the headway the Tea Party was making. He told his homies - leftists - to “get in their faces.” In the meantime the Left media was describing the tea parties as “white racists.” Tea Party did get attacked after this Presidential missive.

Then Holder said in front of a committee that laws against voter intimidation don’t apply to “his people” and that is why he dropped charges against Nation of Islam thugs who were intimidating voters in Philadelphia. Obama didn’t say a word. That was sending a message from the Justice Department and Obama about Black political violence. And since his media and activists have targeted his political enemy as “white”... Diversity doctrines also target the inferior and dangerous social and economic enemy as being the white race.

Remember his “churh” of race hate? Obama has a long history of leftist diversity racism.


145 posted on 08/10/2011 12:02:42 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson