Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raising the Debt Ceiling (Live link to CSPAN) [Hse Bill Passed]
CSPAN ^ | 8.1.2011 | CSPAN

Posted on 08/01/2011 4:15:47 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last
To: editor-surveyor

Time to roll our sleeves up again and get the job done. :)


101 posted on 08/01/2011 5:33:48 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

The republicans proved today they don’t have your best interest at heart. I’m not talking about conservatives. I’m talking about republicans. There’s a big difference.


102 posted on 08/01/2011 5:34:25 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
“The cuts may be small, but the ship of state is like a super tanker and turning it around is not easy and takes a long time. “

That’s a cowardly statement. They could vote not to spend a dime if they wanted to. They are not under any obligation or higher authority to spend anything. They just authorized trillions more in spending.

--------------------------

I agree with the ''They could vote not to spend....''

I AGREE WITH THAT

We said; cut, cut, cut. But it looks like we got; spend, spend, spend. A hamburger today for payment later.

We add another trillion each year to the $14.4 trillion debt and pretend this is responsible?

Once you go off a cliff you can't stop halfway down, and the DeathCare bill that Zer0 and Nancy put in place might finish us off.

BOHIC-A!

How much of this final deal was worked out weeks ago between Obama, Boehner, McConnell, Pelosi, and Reid?

The economy is off the table until after the 2012 election and there's no commitment for a BBA. Is that about right? Fire Boehner for not stopping this.

This was never about stopping the spending. Boehner screwed up with the CR in December 2010, with Boehner 2.0 and now with Reid/Zer0. They should have passed 'Cut, Cap and Balance' as many times as necessary, putting the ball in Cowboy Reid's court until he cries 'uncle.'

Boehner's Blue Pill
''The best advise I can give you all is to ignore any symptoms and ignore all the concerns from taxpayers
that will arise after taking your blue pill medication. That $14 trillion deficit is just the status quo.
So 'eat your peas,' ... and steer for the cliff!'' /sarc
103 posted on 08/01/2011 5:36:25 PM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
Congratulations on already having made the decision to vote for Obama in 2012.

But remember these words.....when you call everyone a RINO, then NO one is a RINO.

McCain qualified for sure, but he had Sarah Palin at his side, and aren't you glad she's in the picture now?

God is in control, Terry. But we need to do the work of continuing to elect conservative, God-fearing, country honoring, Constitution loving candidates in the Republican primaries.

If we do our work in the primaries, there will BE no more John McCains pretending to represent our interests.

Time to get to work, not throw in the towel.

104 posted on 08/01/2011 5:37:42 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“Please name me a time the GOP was more conservative than it is now?”

I agree with most of what you say, but the Reagan Presidency and Gingrich Speakership were broad-spectrum conservative, like on social issues too. The Gingrich House gave us the Defense of Marriage Act and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. But Republican Senators in THIS congress helped Democrats repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

The Tea Party and the House Republican’s “Pledge to America” focus almost entirely on spending cuts. That’s just a tiny part of conservatism.


105 posted on 08/01/2011 5:39:17 PM PDT by Siegfried X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
As a long time Conservative Republicans I understand the difference far better than you Republican haters.

Incidentally, my Congressman voted against the bill. We just need more like HIM.

And they're out there, Terry, but they won't get elected if we turn tail and hide like you're doing.

106 posted on 08/01/2011 5:39:42 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
You do have more faith in what the RINOs and Dems are going to do than I.

"Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this deal is the “Super Congress” provision. This is nothing more than a way to disenfranchise the majority of Congress by denying them the chance for meaningful participation in the crucial areas of entitlement and tax reform. It cedes power to draft legislation to a special commission, hand-picked by the House and Senate leadership. The legislation produced by this commission will be fast-tracked, and Members will not have the opportunity to offer amendments. Approval of the recommendations of the “Super Congress” is tied to yet another debt ceiling increase. This guarantees that Members will face tremendous pressure to vote for whatever comes out of this commission— even if it includes tax increases. This provision is an excellent way to keep spending decisions out of the reach of members who are not on board with the leadership's agenda." Ron Paul today.

107 posted on 08/01/2011 5:39:42 PM PDT by Snuph ("give me Liberty...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Siegfried X
But from time to time conservatives take control of the Republican Party and drive it for awhile. In my lifetime that has happened 3 times:

1 - Reagan Presidency

Definitely transformational and Reagan is a genuine hero, but neither Reagan or the Republican senate we had for awhile were able to cut spending at all. Infact, spending exploded during that period.

2 - Gingrich speakership

The Republicans folded in 95' like a cheap tent when Clinton and media demolished them on the public relations front during the government shutdowns. Again, transformational, but they still didn't really get spending under control. A real lost moment too. Conservatives were on the move, sparked by the Reagan revolution, but Clinton managed to sit in office for 8 years and stymie any real change beyond welfare reform and a few other things.

3 - Tea Party

It's not just the Tea Party. It's the emergence of the Tea Party and movement conservatives that had watched Bush and the Republicans spend like drunken monkey's, act like Democrats and utterly destroy the Republican brand. The grass roots made of up Tea Party and movement conservatives got involved in the primaries - but what's far more important is the STAYED involved. The Republican party is probably more conservative now than it has been since at least WW2. If anyone can name a time where it has been more conservative overall than it is now, please tell me.

108 posted on 08/01/2011 5:45:41 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: dead; CodeToad; Jim Robinson; Eaker; Pete-R-Bilt; B4Ranch
Code Toad, I disagree. Okay?


Unless we're going to call for a full revolution and start shooting, we conservatives need to win more at the ballot box before we can make more substantial progress towards our goals.

We're on a good track in that direction and the next election will be critical to picking up steam. The next important steps are the primaries, especially presidential.

- dead


Primary is a verb.
109 posted on 08/01/2011 5:46:18 PM PDT by glock rocks (Primary is a VERB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Hide? Are you kidding me? Well, you keep voting for anyone who has an “R” after his name and you’ll keep getting what you’ve gotten since 2000.

I say it’s time the rinos joined the real conservatives. The other way around ain’t workin’ too well.

In 1984 I was at a republican victory party. (Yes, I’ve been a republican since way before then.) After the election was called I said “We need to get rid of Phil Graham.”

Everyone said “Oh, no, He’s good guy.”

I said “Then he needs to resign and run as a republican.” And that’s what he did. Now there was a conservativce who stood tall.


110 posted on 08/01/2011 5:47:01 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Siegfried X

Well...now with the Super Congress 12 making deccisions on cuts, that shuts the Tea Party out. They will not have representation there.


111 posted on 08/01/2011 5:51:28 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
"Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this deal is the “Super Congress” provision. This is nothing more than a way to disenfranchise the majority of Congress by denying them the chance for meaningful participation in the crucial areas of entitlement and tax reform. It cedes power to draft legislation to a special commission, hand-picked by the House and Senate leadership. The legislation produced by this commission will be fast-tracked, and Members will not have the opportunity to offer amendments. Approval of the recommendations of the “Super Congress” is tied to yet another debt ceiling increase. This guarantees that Members will face tremendous pressure to vote for whatever comes out of this commission— even if it includes tax increases. This provision is an excellent way to keep spending decisions out of the reach of members who are not on board with the leadership's agenda." Ron Paul today.

First, very little Ron Paul has to say impresses me much. Here he is making a mountain out of a mole hill.

Second, this is a long way from your suggestion that the House would just DEEM whatever the committee put forward into law. Every elected congressperson and senator will get a chance to vote yes or no on whatever this committee puts forth. They can't amend it or filibuster it. The House writes rules for bills all the time that can't be amended. I am quite sure it was done for this very piece of legislation that passed today.

112 posted on 08/01/2011 5:55:21 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

B U M P


113 posted on 08/01/2011 5:58:34 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
You might repeat it but it is a lie. To claim this is the most conservative congress is pure bullshit. They just voted the largest budget increase in the history of COngress.

This wasn't even a budget. What are you talking about?

The budget fight begins in the fall.

114 posted on 08/01/2011 5:59:50 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
the most disturbing aspect of this deal is the “Super Congress” provision. This is nothing more than a way to disenfranchise the majority of Congress by denying them the chance for meaningful participation in the crucial areas of entitlement and tax reform. It cedes power to draft legislation to a special commission, hand-picked by the House and Senate leadership.

That's correct....it's a very dangerous proposition...equally as much giving the 'leadership' of the House and Senate the 'power to appoint' them. This committee will now upstage the Consititution of the American people and the Representation we have in Congress.

They will have the authority to recommend raising taxes....and you can bet they will do just that...among other ill willed things for the American people. This is very nasty business coming down the road.

115 posted on 08/01/2011 6:00:24 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: DH
Nicely done.

I was once a "straight ticket" myself. These days, I watch all those bastards like a hawk (as time permits of course).

It all starts locally.

116 posted on 08/01/2011 6:01:33 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Are you nieve or something? Sure there are legalities and points of order.....but have you not seen these completely ignored and bypassed in these past years since Ob stepped up to the plate? There is no way that this committee is not going to be bought and paid for....and backdoor deals will be enormous among them. It’s a very bad and dangerous plan....no different then the Czars who now run things amuck.


117 posted on 08/01/2011 6:07:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

To be quite frank, my personal wealth is very pleased at this outcome. One thing I hate is when government has a decision to make regarding the economy.
I cant believe many people here would have preferred to default than pass a deal. You would expect that sort of talk on DU where you have the occasional anarchist here and there; but HERE?! Im guessing alot of people on here didnt have much to lose, which is weird since fiscal conservatives would and should have been very worried. Oh thats right! We dont have those types anymore.


118 posted on 08/01/2011 6:07:40 PM PDT by hannibaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; newfrpr04

I have a “summer cottage” in Canader :-)

It is now winterized.Quite cozy.


119 posted on 08/01/2011 6:09:24 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
In the Republican primaries ALL the candidates have "R's" by their names, and our job is to work for, support financially and vote for the more conservative candidate of the two.

THAT, Mr Mross, is how we get rid of the RINO's that we all want to remove.

In the general election, we vote for the R because the alternative is unthinkable. But if we have done our job.....and it's the job of every conservative......then we will have a conservative candidate to run against Obama.

That's the only way it's going to get doen in 2012, and that needs to be the goal of everyone on this forum, and every conservative across the country.

It isn't a matter of voting for anyone who has an "R" by his name, it's a matter of making sure those R's are actual conservatives.

We proved in 2010 that it can be done. It just needs to happen again......and again, and again.

120 posted on 08/01/2011 6:15:18 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson