THAT, Mr Mross, is how we get rid of the RINO's that we all want to remove.
In the general election, we vote for the R because the alternative is unthinkable. But if we have done our job.....and it's the job of every conservative......then we will have a conservative candidate to run against Obama.
That's the only way it's going to get doen in 2012, and that needs to be the goal of everyone on this forum, and every conservative across the country.
It isn't a matter of voting for anyone who has an "R" by his name, it's a matter of making sure those R's are actual conservatives.
We proved in 2010 that it can be done. It just needs to happen again......and again, and again.
The hysterics I'm reading here tonight are so over the top it is beyond silly. This isn't even the actual budget debate.
In the Republican primaries ALL the candidates have "R's" by their names, and our job is to work for, support financially and vote for the more conservative candidate of the two.
I would add the most conservative candidate of the primary field that can actually win. Some disagree with me on that, but I think it is mostly pointless to field candidates that have zero chance of ever getting elected. There are some instances where knocking out a truly vile RINO might make it worthwhile even if we know we will lose the seat, but generally speaking go for the most conservative candidate that can win.
So you’re saying only conservatives were elected in 2010. I know you’re not saying that. And let’s see why some weren’t elected. Because incumbents with an “R” after their name slammed them and refused to support them. There is no doubt in my mind mcconnell (R) and boehner (R) and mccain (R) and graham (R) and the rest of the Rs were thrilled the tea party didn’t take the senate.
On another note, Dick Morris just said that obama will lose in 2012. Now I KNOW we’re screwed.