Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS: Tax Hikes 'Impossible' Under Debt Deal? Think Again ( Debt deal is indeed a BIG TAX HIKE!)
FoxNews ^ | August 01, 2011 3:20PM Eastern | Staff

Posted on 08/01/2011 11:06:13 AM PDT by Kevin in California

Edited on 08/01/2011 12:52:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Just reported that in this debt deal is indeed a BIG TAX HIKE!

This is breaking....:

Tax Hikes 'Impossible' Under Debt Deal? Think Again ...

Published August 01, 2011

| FoxNews.com

The debt-ceiling deal moving toward a vote in Congress could easily pave the way for tax increases despite Republican claims that tax hikes are "impossible" under a deal struck with the White House to reduce spending in exchange for a debt-limit increase. 

But as everyone knows, "impossible" isn't really in Washington's vocabulary.

Here's how it could happen:

After Congress enacts more than $900 billion in spending cuts to give President Obama a $900 billion lift in the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, a bipartisan committee will be formed to find roughly $1.5 trillion in additional deficit savings over the next decade. 

To get there, the committee is free to look at virtually anything -- including "revenue" -- even though House Speaker John Boehner said Sunday night that current budgeting guidelines make it "impossible" for the 12-member group to approve tax hikes. 

Other officials and analysts beg to differ. 

"The suggestion that it is impossible for the joint committee to raise tax revenue simply is not accurate, it's false," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday. 

Tea Party-aligned Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said that's one of the concerns stopping him from supporting the deal. 

"Certainly, tax increases could be something that we could face," Lee told Fox News. 

Boehner is able to claim no tax hikes are possible because the committee would work off the assumption that the Bush tax cuts -- all of them -- will expire in 2013. Combined with other expiring provisions, that adds up to $3.5 trillion in tax hikes over the next decade, without the committee taking any action

Excerpt, read more: here



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deception; democrats; liberalfascism; lies; morevanities; notaxes; notbreaking; notbreakingnews; notsourced; ohthehugevanity; taxcheatparty; taxes; troll; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 last
To: Kevin in California
The following table shows massive spending increases in the bill and this is not all of them.

In $ Trillions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Total  $1,936 $2,107 $2,319 $2,570 $2,668 $2,854 $2,899 $2,945 $2,992 $3,039
Social Security $623 $751 $924 $1,123 $1,166 $1,309 $1,309 $1,309 $1,309 $1,309
Health and Human Services $270 $299 $329 $361 $395 $414 $434 $454 $475 $496
Discretionary Spending $1,043 $1,057 $1,066 $1,086 $1,107 $1,131 $1,156 $1,182 $1,208 $1,234

261 posted on 08/02/2011 8:34:25 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo
So you haven't read the bill?

And your comment "you claimed their(sic) were tax hikes in the bill" is a lie. Sorry, but you are so snarky with your comments that I had to be blunt.

My comment was "He (mike lee) found the tax hikes."

So if you wish to talk to someone who actually said they found the tax hikes, check with Sen Mike Lee

His name is a hotlink to his website.

Excuse me, you claimed their(sic) were tax hikes in the bill and I simply asked you for the proof of this.

So find it and direct me to the location so I can read it also. [Wow you sure are pushy!]If you cannot then simply admit you have no evidence of tax hikes being in the bill.

Let's see, I addressed the first sentence, a false statement.

You should do your own research, I have given you one link to start with.

I never said I had evidence that there (their?) are tax hikes in the bill.

But just to help you our, there are.

The Bush Tax Cuts weren't addressed in the bill by adding text that said "this bill also extends the Bush Tax Cuts,: therefore they will expire. That will be a tax hike. 13,000 or so for someone making 250,000/yr.

Plus the stupid committee that was agreed to can propose more tax hikes.

You can find evidence for that too If you don't get the truth of that. Oh you will find pols that say that is not true, but they are playing you.

Stay tuned to what happens next, taxes will go up.

262 posted on 08/02/2011 9:31:02 AM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: tdscpa

No....you can’t stun someone when they knew it all along. It’s about time though, that other ding bats and sheeple started realizing it....on HIS side too.


263 posted on 08/02/2011 9:48:17 AM PDT by Lucky9teen (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
The Bush Tax Cuts weren't addressed in the bill by adding text that said "this bill also extends the Bush Tax Cuts,: therefore they will expire. That will be a tax hike. 13,000 or so for someone making 250,000/yr.

Sure they will, unless they are extended. Besides that, since when can a current congress impose it's will on a future Congress in the form of passing legislation which the yet to be convened Congress MUST abide by?

Plus the stupid committee that was agreed to can propose more tax hikes.

Which have to be approved by the House (no chance)

You can find evidence for that too If you don't get the truth of that. Oh you will find pols that say that is not true, but they are playing you.

Proof please or is it your OPINION?

Stay tuned to what happens next, taxes will go up.

Or not. Bottom line is you are guessing and have not one shred of evidence to support your position nor does your source. You have posted opinion as fact, a no no.

264 posted on 08/03/2011 8:03:50 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo
Voodoo economics
265 posted on 08/03/2011 10:03:21 AM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson