Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An important message from Sen. Jim DeMint
http://charlestonteaparty.org/an-important-message-from-sen-jim-demint/ ^ | 7/26 | charlestontea party and demint

Posted on 07/26/2011 5:00:49 PM PDT by RummyChick

Fellow Conservatives:

I have troubling news. I’m very careful about criticizing my party’s leaders, but what is happening in Washington right now cannot be ignored. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has abandoned the Cut-Cap-Balance Act and is now pushing a new plan that is nearly identical to the one proposed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

The Boehner-Reid plan gives the President an immediate increase in the debt limit and only promises to cut spending in the future. It violates all three principles of the Cut-Cap-Balance Pledge because it does not substantially cut current spending, it does not truly cap future spending, and it does not require the passage of a strong Balanced Budget Amendment before raising the debt limit.

In short, I oppose the Boehner-Reid plan because it won’t balance the budget and stop the debt that is destroying our country.

The Boehner-Reid Plan

You will hear many claims about this plan over the next few days as it is pushed through the House and Senate. Some of these claims will be true, but many will be false. Here are the facts. The Boehner-Reid plan:

* Provides two increases in the debt limit — $900 billion and $1.6 trillion — totaling $2.5 trillion. It gives the President an immediate $900 billion increase given that Congress does not vote to disapprove it. It gives the President another $1.6 trillion increase next year if a bill written by a new Super Committee passes both houses and becomes law.

* Reduces spending by only $1.2 trillion over the next ten years. This amount won’t even come close to balancing the budget, as the debt is expected to grow by as much as $10 trillion over the next decade. The plan also reduces spending by only $6 billion in 2012. Considering that our government currently spends $10 billion a day, $6 billion is far too little to cut over the first year of the plan.

* Calls for a vote on the Balanced Budget Amendment but does not require its passage. Without passage of a strong Balanced Budget Amendment, Congress will never break its addiction to spending.

* Makes it virtually impossible to stop the debt limit from going up. The debt ceiling increases can only be stopped if Congress passes a resolution of disapproval and then votes to override the President’s veto with two-thirds support in the House and Senate.

* Creates a new, 12-member Super Committee to write another “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit by at least $1.6 trillion. It does not, however, prohibit the Super Committee from writing a bill to raise taxes and destroy jobs. The bill can then be fast-tracked through the House and Senate with no amendments.

Why It Should Be Rejected

After reviewing the details of Boehner-Reid plan, I cannot support it. It won’t balance the budget and stop the debt. Even if the cuts called for in the plan were real, the debt will still increase by $7 trillion over the next ten years.

* It won’t protect our AAA bond rating. According to financial reports, this plan will not reduce long-term spending by enough to prevent a downgrade. If we lose our AAA rating, it will create higher interest rates and cause our debt to grow even faster.

* It will likely result in higher taxes that will destroy even more jobs. The unemployment rate is over 9 percent. We cannot afford to lose more jobs when so many Americans are struggling to find work.

There are some in my party who think I should ignore the flaws of the Boehner-Reid plan, bite my tongue, and support my party’s leaders. If I thought this were a political game, that might make sense. But the future of our country is at stake, I don’t believe this plan will save it, and I have a moral obligation to say so.

The Way Forward

Fortunately, there is a much better solution.

The Cut-Cap-Balance Act would balance the budget, stop the debt, and protect our AAA bond rating. This legislation passed the House with bipartisan support but was blocked by Democrats in the Senate.

The votes in the Senate for Cut-Cap-Balance are there if Republicans stand firm. 23 Democrats in the Senate have expressed support for the Balanced Budget Amendment at some point in their careers. They’re blocking it now because they believe Republicans will blink and agree to something much less.

And that’s exactly what will happen if the Boehner-Reid plan is passed. It gives the big spenders in Washington everything they wanted — an increase in the debt limit, phony spending cuts, and a mechanism to pass tax increases.

Please call your senators today and urge them to oppose the Boehner-Reid plan and to demand passage of the Cut, Cap, Balance Act.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; ccb; debtdeal; demint; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
and Lindsey Graham has had a come to Jesus moment..at least for this round.

Don't forget the Tea Party rally tomorrow in DC.

1 posted on 07/26/2011 5:00:52 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

bump.


2 posted on 07/26/2011 5:01:42 PM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Boehner was so close to doing the right thing. He seemed firm on the principles. He sounded strong. He sounded confident. He had the support of his party's base behind him. The president had a weak TV appearance. Boehner had a strong TV appearance. Everything looked like it was going great.

But I guess he decided to throw that all away.

3 posted on 07/26/2011 5:04:32 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
It gives the big spenders in Washington everything they wanted — an increase in the debt limit, phony spending cuts, and a mechanism to pass tax increases.

AGAIN!!! is the kicker. When will we ever learn???

4 posted on 07/26/2011 5:05:30 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Some Freepers think we should wait and not criticize Boehner until we see what he does.

Big mistake.

Here we are, just on the verge of winning the battle, with Obama looking worse and worse every time he goes on TV, and Boehner wants to cave.

Again. He has repeatedly caved, again and again and again. That is why we cannot afford to wait and see what he does. We need to keep the pressure on and make sure they understand that we will throw the bums out if they do this again.

This is their last chance. Screw it up, and the GOP is dead.


5 posted on 07/26/2011 5:06:50 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

http://www.rollcall.com/news/former_rep_istook_appears_on_house_floor_opposing_boehner_plan-207712-1.html

I wonder how this happened. It looks like House rules were broken.

Former Rep. Istook Appears on House Floor Opposing Boehner Plan


6 posted on 07/26/2011 5:07:35 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

*ping*


7 posted on 07/26/2011 5:09:16 PM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; All
Creates a new, 12-member Super Committee to write another “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit by at least $1.6 trillion. It does not, however, prohibit the Super Committee from writing a bill to raise taxes and destroy jobs. The bill can then be fast-tracked through the House and Senate with no amendments.

This is Boehner and Dingy Harry's way of giving political cover to the TEA Party Caucus in the House and the Commie Caucus in the Senate. By setting up a BRAC type system, in which this "super committee" determines which cuts to make (if any) and which taxes to raise in secret, its recommendations would be rushed to the floor of both houses, passed by voice vote, and then sent to Obama for his signature. No debate. No amendments. It'll be take it or leave it, and we'll all be sold down the river.

And this thing has Mitch McConnell's fingerprints all over it.

8 posted on 07/26/2011 5:10:17 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I knew they would cave, just not so quickly.


9 posted on 07/26/2011 5:10:26 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

R U Gonna Be posting some pics? I hope so.


10 posted on 07/26/2011 5:11:09 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

interesting.

i have no knowledge of house rules.


11 posted on 07/26/2011 5:11:10 PM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

All Boehner had to do was hold the line while Demint and friends worked the vote over the weekend.

Instead, he scares up a non-exsistant Asian Market Emergency....

Trump is right when he said Republicans are horrible negotiators


12 posted on 07/26/2011 5:11:28 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

You got less than one chance, Boner, you sonofabitch, and so do we.

As far as I can tell, the GOP is about to kill itself, and take the country with it in the process.


13 posted on 07/26/2011 5:11:56 PM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Boehner was so close to doing the right thing. He seemed firm on the principles. He sounded strong. He sounded confident. He had the support of his party's base behind him. The president had a weak TV appearance. Boehner had a strong TV appearance. Everything looked like it was going great.

Well stated. Just damn.

14 posted on 07/26/2011 5:12:24 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

What is WRONG with this man? Boehner, I mean. Is he drunk?

Obama I know. Boehner - I cannot figure out.


15 posted on 07/26/2011 5:12:24 PM PDT by don-o (Abolish FReepathons. Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Some people create wealth, some take wealth and some are given wealth. Eliminate any one and everything is different. There is no other solution. No, not one.

16 posted on 07/26/2011 5:12:53 PM PDT by I see my hands (Embrace misanthropy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has abandoned the Cut-Cap-Balance Act and is now pushing a new plan that is nearly identical to the one proposed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

I don't trust Boner. Thank you Sen. DeMint for speaking the truth. Now if you'd only dump Romney.

17 posted on 07/26/2011 5:14:03 PM PDT by McGruff (Don't go wobbly on me now GOP leadership)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
" All Boehner had to do was hold the line while Demint and friends worked the vote over the weekend. "

This is the second time. Looks like time for a new Speaker to me.

18 posted on 07/26/2011 5:14:41 PM PDT by OKSooner (When someone tells you who they are, believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I like CC&B because it has teeth. I also think Boehner believes
the passage of CC&B will be blamed on Republicans in 2012 fostered by the MSM. Pass Boehners plan and we get Obama for another 4 because the MSM will make him a hero negotiator even though he did squat. I say go for CC&B and let the chips fall where they may.


19 posted on 07/26/2011 5:14:45 PM PDT by teletech (Say NO to RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I don’t see how this will get past a House vote... considering what was said earlier today by several House leaders... like 176 House Republican Members are not in favor...


20 posted on 07/26/2011 5:15:33 PM PDT by ICCtheWay (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson