[IbJensen]

Homosexuals need their own country where they can literally screw their brains out in any fashion they choose.

Check with France and see if Devil's Island is available.

[AliVeritas]

ping

[Drango]

Lavender Mafia.

[ExTxMarine]

This is an OBVIOUS violation of hate-crime laws!

But, hey, videos of the Black Panthers violating election intimidation laws were OBVIOUS and we saw what happened with those charges!

Sorry, but I am not holding my breath!!!

[Gondring]

Decades ago, I worked at a place that was considering giving up family discounts because of demands for an extended definition of “family”.

[Ohioan]

This situation is, frankly, totally outrageous; yet it grows out of the Utilitarian/Collectivist mindset, which pushed the so-called "Civil Rights" laws in the first place. The idea that people cannot discriminate--i.e. make personal choices as to with whom they choose to do business, on their own property--effectively appropriates one of the principal attributes of private property. It certainly does not reflect the philosophic tenets that the Founding Fathers held sacred.

Indeed, the philosophic principal is the same, whether you require someone to accommodate a homosexual couple, or forbid them to accommodate a homosexual couple. But the ACLU & other Fabian Socialist apparatuses see it wholly as a one way street, against the preferences of the religious property owner.

This reflects the Leftist totalitarian bias of the ACLU, but is not tenable to any fair minded & rational person.

William Flax

[frogjerk]

So much for anti-Bullying laws...

[crusader71]

If you want a laugh (or a cry), just look at how the leftist media presents this story. I did a search and found this on ABC News. There is literally NO MENTION of the O’Reilly’s reason for denying the reception, and of course no mention of their 1st amendment rights. It just tries to portray them as ignorant and hateful. Ridiculous.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/vermont-inn-sued-refusal-host-gay-couples-wedding/story?id=14110076

[Psalm 73]

It will get worse - much worse.

[WKUHilltopper]

And the FBI “Hate Crime Unit” is where, now?

[yoe]

"The homosexual agenda and religious liberty cannot co-exist. America will have to choose between the two, because we cannot have both. Every advance of the homosexual agenda comes at the expense of religious liberty. Every time - every single time - the homosexual agenda advances, religious liberty is forced into retreat."

For a reason.....America's aggressively radical homosexuals like her aggressively radical secularists who want exclusion of religion and religious considerations....both want the break down of cultural standards of morality. The gradual disintegration of societal well being bring the decay of morality cum religion and then the laws of nature are disavowed by the radical few to the downfall of the rest of us. Those who can will leave the affected cities, looking for unaffected areas leaving behind the debased.........

[Jerrybob]

I have no problem with homosexuals; they are people. I do, however have a great deal of problems with the homosexual AGENDA; big difference.

[Ladysforest]

ABC is censoring the comments. I left some a few days ago-nothing offensive, just used the word “homosexual” instead of “gay”. They pulled the comments FAST.

I also said that this should be a lesson to Inn and B&B owners - if they hold their noses and book just one or two homosexual “weddings”, but things seem to go wrong with the service - cold food and warm cocktails - the word will get through the homo community fast that your service is lousy, and they stop booking there right quick.

Some additional suggestions:

It is so easy to drop a few dead mice here and there...........very loud music coming from some unknown location happens during the ceremony or toasting. Toilets plugged up. Smoke detectors keep going off. Manager acts drunk and goofy. Servers wear weird neon colors - the “new” uniforms for the Inn. Or very wrinkled shirts. There are hundreds of things that can be done. And that will insure that the word gets through the homo marriage set to steer clear of that place. And every “mistake” or dead mouse, cannot be proven to be planned. As long as there are no emails, no meetings, and the arrangements are handled carefully by one person - problem solved.

I think the number of businesses who would turn away homosexuals is very small anyway, but for those who have strong convictions against holding nuptial parties for them, they just need to be creative.

It would be better to refund a portion of the bill to “apologize” that some unexpected inconveniences occurred, but if the next homosexual wedding had just as many little snafus...well I’d bet that would be about the last one that booked that particular property.

It’s old school.

[Darksheare]

I know you’re gone, but don’t you think that for your rant to be valid the homosexuals wouldn’t behave in the manner described by this article?
Yes, homosexuals are nasty, perverse, full of hatred towards anyone who doesn’t allow them to be as disgusting as they wish.
Homosexuals are some of the most childish people on the planet, petulant, and vindictive.
They have stormed into churches and thrown used condoms at the parishiners, they have assaulted people simply because they were not homosexuals.

[trumandogz]

The Wildflower Inn in Vermont will lose this lawsuit as there are laws in the state that prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation for public accommodation.

[little jeremiah]

I’ll ping it out tomorrow. I’m doing the ping lists too, so feel free to alert me to articles if you want.