Posted on 07/19/2011 7:32:24 PM PDT by Ocarterma
Who has a better chance of winning the Republican nomination?
(Excerpt) Read more at gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com ...
“Palin has a better chance of winning the nomination. Perry has a better chance of winning the Presidency.”
________________________________________________________
Was this your really deep thought for the day? Better try again.
Be honest..is “FreedomForce” really Mitch McConnell?
FreedomForce doesn’t even like Mitch McConnell.
I don't put much stock in polls, especially at this stage of the game, but I like this result. :-)
I agree with you up to the last part. I want her to run and don't give a hoot if she can win. She may win the Primary and will raise the discord. The other retreads are not going to win the election against obamamama. And I will take the hit trying. Semper Fi.
LOL, me too.
Try real hard not to be a dumass. She has been thrashed too much to be taken as a serious national candidate.
“Perry’s got to be the nominee.”
No way I’ll vote for him!
“FreedomForce doesn’t even like Mitch McConnell.”
__________________________________________________
You sound just like an establishment, RINO type. I swear I’m reading posts from McConnell or McCain.
Your political analysis smells of establisment.
Went to see Undefeated, it was all that you heard it was-—Epic!
Both Perry or Palin could win, for different reasons.
Gov. Palin has the most populist appeal, including Tea Party support. Perry seems to have the establishment backing. I believe both could appeal to the base, probably Palin more so.
Perry will be compared to George W. Bush by the media. There's no way around that. Palin would be attacked with the same old stuff. Both could overcome with effective campaigns. Perry is somewhat behind Palin in name recognition.
I see Palin as already having turned the tide. I see the Perry team trying to build some enthusiasm for his entrance.
The big question becomes is there room enough for both to run for the nomination? I believe there is and I would guess with as much time remains, other events, separate from both prospective campaigns, could shape who becomes the eventual nominee.
She said Ron Paul was cool a few years back.
She might understand that some of the Ron Paul voters might be pretty tough for her to get otherwise.
She might understand that she might need those votes in the Big Ten states.
She probably understands that Ron Paul is a True Conservative, a Tea Party Conservative, a Limited Constitutional Government Conservative, who appeals to certain segments of the D’s and I’s.
A position that the states should decide their own marijuana laws is not liberal. It’s tea party conservative. Limited Constitutional Government.
Ron Paul’s foreign policy is very similar to Robert Taft’s.
“A Foreign Policy For Americans”
“If we are foolish in our use of our strength, we shall not survive” - Robert Taft “Mr. Republican”
http://mises.org/books/taft.pdf
And/or her husband. LOL
I would love to see her run for Senate in Alaska and kick Lisa Murkowski in the butt.
Don’t believe everything the media tells you. She will win in a landslide.
Pray for America
No..........a Palin/Paul ticket is a no starter and a certain loser!
I couldn’t even bring myself to vote for McCain even with Palin on the ticket. I cast a protest vote for Keyes in 2008. If Sarah had been at the top of the ticket in 2008 I’d have been out campaigning for her.
I think that the voters are fed up with the 1/2 Black Dem with the God complex.
You betcha!!!!!!!!!
Ron Paul is retiring, he isn’t really running to be a 77 year old Vice President, or anything else.
You may admire Paul a lot, but he doesn’t need to be included in 2012 presidential discussions.
I’d be hoping for a credible 3rd party if that was the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.