Skip to comments.
Gallup: For First Time, Majority in U.S. Supports Public Smoking Ban
Gallup ^
| 07/15/2011
| Frank Newport
Posted on 07/15/2011 10:43:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A majority of Americans (59%) support a ban on smoking in all public places for the first time since Gallup initially asked the question in 2001. At the same time, fewer than 2 in 10 support the idea of making smoking totally illegal in this country.
According to the American Lung Association, 27 states plus the District of Columbia have passed comprehensive smoke-free laws. A New York City law bans smoking in virtually all public places, including outdoor plazas and beaches.
When Gallup first asked about a ban on public smoking in 2001, 39% were in favor, an attitude that stayed roughly the same through 2007, the last time Gallup asked the question until this year's July 7-10 survey.
Americans are much less supportive of the idea of a Prohibition-like law that would make smoking totally illegal within the United States. Nineteen percent support that option, not much different from the 14% who favored making smoking illegal in 1990, when Gallup first asked the question.
(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gallup; poll; pufflist; smoking; smokingban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: SeekAndFind
59 percent of Americans are utter and complete morons. Nothing new about that.
2
posted on
07/15/2011 10:46:38 AM PDT
by
arderkrag
(Georgia is God's Country. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: SeekAndFind
Americans are much less supportive of the idea of a Prohibition-like law that would make smoking totally illegal within the United States. Why?
The same thing is being supported via stealth.
If we are going to destroy personal freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution for the good of the whole, then someone should proudly put their name on it politically!
3
posted on
07/15/2011 10:48:10 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: SeekAndFind
The American public voted for “The Divine One.”
4
posted on
07/15/2011 10:51:00 AM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: SeekAndFind; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
The nice thing about banning cigarettes is that now less people smoke, that means that people live longer(unless they replace it with food and get diabetes and high blood pressure) and people living longer means ....entitlements (and medicaid) cost more, just what we need.
Smoking was banned in MD years ago, cant be within 50 feet of entrance of a public ( private business) building, BUT if we ‘like’ the same sex we got some new rights in exchange.
5
posted on
07/15/2011 10:53:55 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
To: SeekAndFind
If they can outlaw smokes, why can’t they outlaw “saggin”? :-/
6
posted on
07/15/2011 10:58:21 AM PDT
by
Sporke
(USS-Iowa BB-61)
To: SeekAndFind
and how many of those favor legalizing marijuana?
To: sickoflibs
The nice thing about banning cigarettes is that now less people smoke, that means that people live longer(unless they replace it with food and get diabetes and high blood pressure) and people living longer means ....entitlements (and medicaid) cost more, just what we need.
yep. more payouts with less revenue- people that quit smoking don't pay cigarette taxes.
8
posted on
07/15/2011 10:58:51 AM PDT
by
absolootezer0
(2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
To: SeekAndFind
To: sickoflibs
” Smoking was banned in MD years ago, cant be within 50 feet of entrance of a public ( private business) building, BUT if we like the same sex we got some new rights in exchange.”
Sweet.................
10
posted on
07/15/2011 11:17:13 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
Click the Weird Blotch
Soar With the Eagles
Donate today
Or donate monthly
A sponsoring FReeper will contribute
$10 for each New Monthly Donor
11
posted on
07/15/2011 11:18:40 AM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
To: newzjunkey
What took so long?
Propaganda often takes time to work.
12
posted on
07/15/2011 11:19:37 AM PDT
by
chrisser
(Starve the Monkeys!)
To: SeekAndFind
I don't smoke, and I don't like to be around someone who is smoking. Nevertheless, if a bar or restaurant wants to cater to smokers, I'll simply take my business elsewhere.
I do think smoking should be banned in government buildings, schools, and other places where people have no choice but to be there.
13
posted on
07/15/2011 11:23:52 AM PDT
by
JoeFromSidney
(New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
RE
Smoking was banned in MD years ago, cant be within 50 feet of entrance of a public ( private business) building, BUT if we like the same sex we got some new rights in exchange..... Sweet................."
I guess there are some similarities beween smoking and .... oh never mind LOL
14
posted on
07/15/2011 11:26:53 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
To: SeekAndFind
Carrie Nation is alive and well.
15
posted on
07/15/2011 11:27:12 AM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(They govern without the consent of the governed.)
To: JoeFromSidney
I don't smoke, and I don't like to be around someone who is smoking. Nevertheless, if a bar or restaurant wants to cater to smokers, I'll simply take my business elsewhere.
I do think smoking should be banned in government buildings, schools, and other places where people have no choice but to be there. Bingo! I should not have to smell it, if I don't want to smell it, and I'm also in favor of steep fines for throwing butts on the ground, or out of the car window. Littering is littering.
16
posted on
07/15/2011 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
rivercat
(Typed on my OSX-free MBP! Windows 7 (SP1) FTW!)
To: SeekAndFind
We have become such a nation of whiny,nanny wusses. It’s sad.
17
posted on
07/15/2011 11:46:12 AM PDT
by
Horusra
(The Democrat party is now the National Socialist party (nationalize the banks, socialize healthcare))
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t smoke and don’t enjoy being around it but I never fail to be astounded at the number of people who want to recreate East Germany within our borders.
18
posted on
07/15/2011 12:08:20 PM PDT
by
relictele
(Pax Quaeritur Bello)
To: SeekAndFind
The only perverse aspect of this is that it is being presented as a potential federal matter. Let the people of each state decide.
19
posted on
07/15/2011 12:50:09 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
To: SeekAndFind
... and the REASON for a US Constitution is because in a raw Democracy, the majority will always oppress the minority.
Hence the Constitutional Republic wisely provided us by our brilliant old white founding Fathers. That same Constitutional Republic the left needs to dismantle to implement hard communism. And they have the numbers of Sheeple to do it, too.
20
posted on
07/15/2011 12:56:13 PM PDT
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(SP12: They called Reagan "unelectable", too.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson