let's add this statement :
It would take dozens of NATO fighters to do as much damage.
To: SeekAndFind
Why can't we do this to Iran?
Clearly they are an active imminent THREAT to ALL MANKIND!
The words "Submit or Die" take on new meaning when they have nukes!
2 posted on
07/13/2011 3:10:02 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
To: SeekAndFind
This president, who railed against neo-con initiated agression in the past; has become a reckless hawk.
3 posted on
07/13/2011 3:10:59 PM PDT by
cicero2k
To: SeekAndFind
let’s add this statement.
GET OUT OF LIBYA NOW OBAMA..... WE ARE BOMBING THE NATION OF AN ALLY......ONE WHO FOUGHT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ON BEHALF OF US PATRIOTS.
This treasonous act of Obama is an impeachable offence, and an offence to the War Powers Act.
5 posted on
07/13/2011 3:11:42 PM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_omanybama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: SeekAndFind
The “Lancer”, previously known as “Reagan’s Folly”.
6 posted on
07/13/2011 3:13:31 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: SeekAndFind
Now that is a LONG mission with no real crew rest.
Friends tell me the BONE can begin to push back pretty hard on long missions. You really FEEL the seat.
At least the B-2 would be comfier.
7 posted on
07/13/2011 3:13:41 PM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: SeekAndFind
So Libya’s air defenses are no more?
8 posted on
07/13/2011 3:17:47 PM PDT by
SeeSharp
To: SeekAndFind
The U.S. Air Force has deployed its bombers like never before in the Libya campaign. Has anyone informed Congress of this?
Is this something they should know has happened?
9 posted on
07/13/2011 3:18:16 PM PDT by
Palmetto Patriot
(How much better off would we be if these bastards would just leave us alone?)
To: SeekAndFind
read the comments...
10 posted on
07/13/2011 3:19:13 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: All
15 posted on
07/13/2011 3:33:24 PM PDT by
DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
(Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
To: SeekAndFind
Lies! Lies! Lies!
We all know this cannot be true.
Weeks and weeks ago Obama said we are only in a support roll to NATO and are not conducting actual military missions ourselves.
Besides, with the nation in such dire economic straits what kind of an idiot would direct the military to perform such a costly mission, burn all that fuel and generate all that pollution just to bomb another piece of the Libyan sandbox?
20 posted on
07/13/2011 3:49:01 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
To: SeekAndFind
Those missions sound pretty “Kinetic” to me!!
22 posted on
07/13/2011 3:53:19 PM PDT by
MrTed
("...at the name of Jesus, every knee will bow...", will it be before or after one's death?)
To: SeekAndFind
Ninety-eight 500 pounders is 49,000 pounds. I presume this means each bomber carried 49 bombs.
26 posted on
07/13/2011 4:01:10 PM PDT by
beelzepug
(" Shaved ice for me and my monkey, please.")
To: SeekAndFind
Thank God I never had to “hep” out with the killing for an illegal President...waging an illegal action...
To: SeekAndFind
And what are we getting for this massive waste of tax dollars. I’m never been isolationist as that always seems to end in a major world war, but I’m sick to death of us being the world’s policemen. I say bring all of our troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan and all the other military actions in the middle east. Screw em. We’re broke. We don’t have the money to play world police and we haven’t had the money for decades.
31 posted on
07/13/2011 4:17:49 PM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(SP12: They called Reagan "unelectable", too.)
To: SeekAndFind
I guess they figured out that Rotary Bomb Bay thing and filled it with JDAMS. Nice Tech to have.
36 posted on
07/13/2011 5:53:07 PM PDT by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: SeekAndFind
Instead of 787 billion for "Porkulus" they should have spent some of that on these B-1's for the proposed upgrade to the flight deck and avionics systems and engine upgrades to the Pratt and Whitney F119's in the F-22 that would make it supersonic again.
Probably would have done the mission in a shorter frame of time....
39 posted on
07/13/2011 7:01:41 PM PDT by
taildragger
(( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson