I think she can win too..but it will be bloody.
So is Newsweek touting her with a favorable cover evidence that they think she is a good foil for Obama to clobber?
That is what many here say about anyone the media touts however briefly?
It’s not like there is not some argument for that...they sure pushed McCain.
But I think it has to be determined ...will the media push a candidate they think Orbama can beat like Palin or Bachman or do they push a GOP nominee they find easier to swallow ..like McCain or maybe Giuliani
I am happy she got a decent cover....a bit surprised.
But I am tired of all the teasing...getting the nomination is a grind...popular or not.
Has anyone come in late?
Reagan was in campaign mode more or less entirely from 76-80...what order did he announce then?
There were a slew of GOP candidates that year...Carter looked like such easy pickings
I find this VERY interesting:
ALL previous pictures I’ve seen on ALL magazine covers,
have highlighted Sarah’s good looks, if not inherent glamor
and ‘youthfullness”.
THAT was in a different era, apparently: all of that was meant to immply that
she SHOULDN’T win. (too good looking)
This NEWSWEEK cover is the only I’ve seen where Sarah looks her age, and is supposed to look her age, and the glamor seems stripped from her.
MESSAGE STILL, with the caption “I CAN WIN” is
SHE SHOULDN’T WIN.(not good looking enough)
Why do I have a feeling that whatever they write in the article will be negative or at best damning with faint praise?
Sarah, we are great admirers of you and your philosophy. Unfortunately, you ran for VP before your were ready. You went on TV and debated an idiot who could make up lies and re write history faster than you could counter. As a result you became a lightening rod. Back Bachmann and negotiate a position in her admin and we all win ! Then you will be ready to run and WIN....
Will Carl Bernstein EVER go away?
He’s lovin’ Murdoch’s “Watergate” but is silent on Gunwalker (naturally)
I like it!!!!!!
I’d like to read her own words, I guess that will be tomorrow.
She need to annouce pretty soon, if she is serious and gets in to win.
With boobs like that she has never been and never will be a loser.
If anyone is offended by that statement, please accept my apologies in advance.
A headline for an article inside the magazine, "Murdoch's Watergate" by none other than Carl Bernstein aka Dustin Hoffman aka Fellow Traveler.
Could it possibly be a hit piece on Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch?
Naw, coudn't be.
Leni
interesting how the LSM juxtaposes the evil “voldemort” right next to palin.
it is a typical msm trickery.
As far as I'm concerned, you already have. A long time ago. Cool thing is, you keep winning.
Of course Palin can win. But frankly, I'm tired of looking at photos of Sarah Palin as a beautiful, sexy, diva. It does not help her to win anything, except for the biological "affections" of the horny. I like Sarah Palin, her courage, spirit and love of America. But a little more brilliant, inspiring, politically savvy conversation and a little less "cover girl" stuff would help her a lot. I think of other capable and successful female leaders, like Margaret Thatcher, Michelle Bachman, (who's also very pretty but attires herself conservatively, not as a 'diva'), and Germany's Angela Merkel. Palin also needs to take very seriously her voice tone and her 'hyper' style of speaking when giving speeches, she needs vocal practice, (just like successful singers and actors do), and some adjustments to her whiney sounding voice. Also, she often shouts when she need not to. Think of Reagan, and his perpetual calm and cool voice, with a great sense of humor.
All that said, Palin would probably make a very good President, especially if she surrounded herself with some highly competent advisors and Cabinet members, who are also TRUSTWORTHY, and not out to write a book about Palin after quitting 18 months into their post. Palin has her heart in the right place, and she's strong and a natural fighter. I love her faith and her loyalty to Todd and family, and to our Constitution. But when going head-to-head with an experienced President, (which Obama will be by then), who has a deep, manly voice and speaks with authority, and who has the media on his side, who will have an endless supply of money, and who will pull every filthy, rotten, stinkinig trick in the book, (including getting hundreds of thousands, or millions, of illegal votes), I think Sarah will have a very difficult time of going head to head with Obama and winning the debates thoroughly enough to take him down. Though I hate the Communist Obama's every policy, and detest his arrogance, it's going to take a strong, highly capable man to beat him, due to the above advantages he will use to the hilt. (Hell, already Warren Buffet is extolling the economic abilities of Obama, and he'll get many more such significant endorsements too.
I'd like to see a Pawlenty / Palin ticket, or a Rick Perry/Palin ticket, or a Santoram/ Palin ticket, with Palin as VP. (or possibly replace Palin with Bachman as VP with those men).
Obama is eminently beatable, he's like a powerhouse baseball team who has won the previous World Series, but who has suffered the loss of their Ace pitcher and their best run producer during the off season. He's limping, and he's beatable.
ping
And the greater majority of those minds are already practicing, "Madam President"
Murdock’s Watergate. Thats laughable. The lefties are really trying to turn that into a downing street memo aren’t they.
so you know, they blew up her head which makes her neck look too small for it.....
That photo ads 10 years to Sarah’s age. Shame on Newsweek.
Of course we’re not electing her because of her looks. But, still.
I think she can win, too! I hope she does run, but if she doesn’t, I’ll just have to choose among the other Repub. primary candidates.