Posted on 07/06/2011 1:18:22 PM PDT by truthfreedom
Question: If the Texas Republican primary were held today, which presidential candidate would you be most likely to vote for?
Ron Paul – 22% Rick Perry – 17% Herman Cain – 14% Newt Gingrich – 11% Gary Johnson – 9% Mitt Romney – 8% Michele Bachmann – 7% Tim Pawlenty – 2% John Huntsman – 2% Rock Santorum – 1% Undecided – 7%
(Excerpt) Read more at azimuthpolls.com ...
Ron Paul agrees with Robert Taft.
I don’t think Ron Paul thinks we shouldn’t be strong.
I think he is in favor of strong defense, but not attacking countries who didn’t attack us.
Ron Paul thinks we should abolish the CIA. Yeah, that’s real “strong national defense” oriented.
He left the GOP in 88 cause of Ronald Reagan...
YOU don't get to define and oversimplify my beliefs or opinions - you distract
you need to stop trying to defend the wackjob until you educate yourself on his record and statements - then learn how to debate
you are responsible for more people hating ron paul than ron paul himself
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html
The link was not to something that he did
The link was to a word he used that he didn’t like.
If you want to make a fuller argument, feel free.
Make an complete argument without photoshops and the word wackjob.
Attacking other countries that didn’t attack us is expensive.
What is your argument?
Blah blah blah wackjob blah blah.
Make the argument.
Ron Paul ran against George Bush in 1988.
Uncontested Fact.
Ron Paul ran against George Bush in 1988.
Uncontested Fact.
Ron Paul led the Texas Delegation for Reagan.
Another Uncontested Fact.
What you have is your opinion.
It is an uncontested fact that Ron Paul left the GOP in ‘88 because Reagan was too big government for him. Go ask him, he won’t lie. He only ducks the question when it comes to the beliefs of his radical nutjob associates.
In your opinion we cannot have a strong national defense without the CIA?
I’m not saying Ron Paul doesn’t want to abolish the CIA. Ron Paul does want a much much smaller Federal Government.
Ron Paul wants to abolish many many Federal Agencies.
Send a link to a bill he sponsored or voted for which tried to abolish the CIA.
I’m not saying that Ron Paul doesn’t want smaller government, just that I don’t have the specifics about all the cuts he wants to make.
no hatin on the wackjob word - embrace it
hahahahahahahha
http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=13635&t=Muslim+newspaper+endorses+Ron+Paul+in+Michigan
Muslim newspaper endorses Ron Paul in Michigan
too funny
Look, you seem to be a conservative who supports Ron Paul, not one of those radical libertarian nuts. If that's the case, can you please explain to me why Ron Paul chooses to associate with radical libertarians nuts like Lew Rockwell and his band of merry anarchists and co-authors bills with Barney Frank, but then won't associate with the Tea Party Caucus?
He voted for DADT repeal, and here's why: http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/05/28/Ron_Paul_on_DADT_Repeal_Vote/ That doesn't sound like he wants to ban homosexuals in the military to me.
When the primary actually takes place, he will be lucky to match that total.
Discountable poll.
Is probably the only reason I could think of that I wouldn't vote for Sarah Palin.
Get real you Paulistians. He didn't go nowhere before and he's headed down the same road. Only four years more senile.
Can not comment I have annoyed some moderators and Freepers on another thread. Sorry.
So, how does that translate to 22% statewide? It doesn't.
Paul remains a distraction -- a sideshow. A gadfly, hoping to draw attention to himself.
The crazy uncle in the Republican attic...
It's likely one of those polls that can be spammed by Paulbots.
Paulbots swam and spam these things and then post them as if they're realistic.
Most of us didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday and know they're bogus.
But it's all the Paulbots have, so I guess we should let them revel in their little fanstasy world.
After all, they spammed so hard to get there.
I don't see anything significant about them either and I've never heard of them.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were some arm of ronpaulforums.com or one of those groups.
There aren't any good internals to go by. Likely just some Paul worship group putting this garbage out hoping to reel in yet another of those people that PT Barnum referenced. There's one born every minute, after all. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.