Look, you seem to be a conservative who supports Ron Paul, not one of those radical libertarian nuts. If that's the case, can you please explain to me why Ron Paul chooses to associate with radical libertarians nuts like Lew Rockwell and his band of merry anarchists and co-authors bills with Barney Frank, but then won't associate with the Tea Party Caucus?
He voted for DADT repeal, and here's why: http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/05/28/Ron_Paul_on_DADT_Repeal_Vote/ That doesn't sound like he wants to ban homosexuals in the military to me.
Thanks for a link. I don’t really want to read whole books. I do put links to them, but “find what I’m talking about in 400 pages” doesn’t work for me.
See my stuff in Rick Perry threads for what I think is well formatted research. title, link, relevant section.
Often, people don’t have what they think they have.
I looked at your link. He says people should be banned for conduct. Presumably they could be banned for sodomy?
I personally am not in favor of gays in the military.
I don’t know enough about Lew Rockwell. I know that he’s disliked here.
About Barney Frank, I don’t know. Certainly Barney Frank is bad. So’s Obama. And often Ron Paul criticizes Obama on Foreign Policy, and people here attack Ron Paul and defend Obama. So, it’s not quite as simple as you think it is.
I do support that bill. I do think that it should be left to the states. And I think that’s the right tea party position. Limited Constitutional Government.
I do like Ron Paul. And I’m not a libertarian. But I’ll say that Ron Paul Supporters Are Annoying. (RPSAA) I’m over on RonPaulForums. And I come closer to getting banned over there than here. And they rarely ban anybody. Rarely do I scream at someone and call them names here. There, all the time. But the people who like Ron Paul are not Ron Paul.