Posted on 07/03/2011 10:16:16 AM PDT by Clairity
The just-concluded Texas legislative session has armed Gov. Rick Perry with a host of red-meat issues that could entice conservative Republican voters if he jumps into the wide-open presidential primary race.
But analysts say some of those issues could carry consequences in reaching broader constituencies in the general election match-up against President Barack Obama.
Texas' longest-serving governor burnished his conservative profile with legislative victories that included a no-tax budget with $15 billion in cuts, property rights protections, voter ID legislation and a bill requiring sonograms before abortions.
Two other Perry-backed issues - an immigration measure to ban so-called sanctuary cities and legislation to prohibit intrusive airport pat-downs - could also enhance the Texas governor's stature among conservative activists though the measures ultimately died in the Legislature.
Even without declaring, Perry is becoming an early favorite among Tea Party activists for his adherence to limited government and his verbal assaults on Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...
Perry-economy or Obamanomics?
I don’t know why this article touts tea party support I just read an open letter to the governor to use his powers to call another special session with tons of signatures from all kinds of Tea Party and political orgs..they will not go for zero action on immigration on TSA groping.
If anybody in TX has oil and gas revenues that require tax payments there is an attempt to derail instate tuition for illegals via a lawsuit. More plaintiffs are needed.respond to me for details.
Hey... HEY.... you forgot about Guardisil MANDATE and uh, uh, uh.... oh yeah Perry has good hair.
I thought the Texas legislative session just went down in flames with none of the red-meat issues being passed.
First, the Texas governorship has limited actual authority. Most of the governor's power rests in appointments. Very little power rests in influencing legislation, except via veto or by the selection of which items to include in a special session of the legislature. Most actual power rests with the lieutenant governor. Therefore many of the accomplishments credited to Perry (or formerly credited to Bush, when he was governor) are actually largely attributable to others.
Secondly, Perry has always seemed to be more about Perry, than he has been about actually doing things for the good of the state.
Thirdly, Perry has very little international expertise or experience.
Michele Bachman seems a more sound candidate, although admittedly she is not nearly as well understood here in Texas as is Perry.
Having said all of that, I certainly would support Perry, if he were to become the nominee, as an alternative to four more years of Obama.
How did ordinary, middle-class, West Texan Rick Perry get “in” with the Bildebergs?
It’s not a “Perry-economy.”
It’s a Texas economy.
We were doing just fine before Perry became governor. He tries to take credit for the good results of a pro-business, less government culture that he neither created nor promoted.
Fact is, Perry’s philosophy is to stick government’s nose where it is not needed.
We have to continually fight Perry’s bad ideas. This is one Texan who’s plumb worn out with him.
At first I was appalled at the idea of a Perry candidacy, but I’m coming around. It may be the quickest way to get him out of Texas.
Something really good about these Ricks.
Perry is a little better than that. He has always been good on life and has been somewhat conservative on other issues, except the TTC and immigration. The Romney comparison is wrong, but Perry is far from being a consistent conservative.
Perry is a conservative politician -- as distinct from a being a conservative.
I agree. Between Obama and Perry...there would be no hesitation.
Of course he’s sounding conservative. He’s campaigning.
“With Republicans like Perry, who needs democrats?’
So we might as well stick with Obama, right?
‘Perry is a conservative politician — as distinct from a being a conservative.’
Which makes him electable, you have a problem with that?
Ask Perry what he thought of banning sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants in Texas...
The argument you make for Perry could be made for Romney.
The counter-argument is that Conservatives want someone who doesn’t suck. Perry sucks.
How did Perry get “in” with the Bilderbergs.
Probably the Forced Vaccinations.
The Forced Vaccinations was Feb 2007, the Bilderberg meeting was May 2007.
Forced Vaccinations made Bilderberg drool. They loved it. And from a “Conservative”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.