Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Emperor Palpatine
Well, we could start with the fact that he's A.) in bed with the Bilderbergers, B.) for amnesty, C.) for the Trans-Texas Corridor, and D.) has historically supported the RINO wing of the party....like Rudy in the 2008 race. Perry talks a good conservative game when he's running. Then he governs as a typical BIG-GUB'MINT Republican a la George, (opr should that be Jorge), W. Bush. He's Romney with a Texas drawl. He'll NEVER get my vote.

Hey, nobody's perfect.

But, seriously folks, there is no one on our side who is not 100X better than the neo-Marxist Obozo. So while we'd all like the "Perfect Conservative" (whomever that may be) to be our nominee, the GOP nominee will get my full support, because now matter which way you cut it, he or she will be helluva a lot better than the alternative.
4 posted on 07/03/2011 10:41:52 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Signalman

The argument you make for Perry could be made for Romney.

The counter-argument is that Conservatives want someone who doesn’t suck. Perry sucks.


19 posted on 07/03/2011 12:00:26 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson