Let's hope the law gets amended before too many more folks get cited for "RWI", eh?
To: DemforBush
That’s ridiculous. Public drunkeness should be reserved for nuisances, not responsible passengers minding their business.
To: DemforBush
If I’m passed out in the back seat, they can arrest me? Arrest me for sleeping?
3 posted on
07/01/2011 8:16:33 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: DemforBush; bamahead
What the hell is up with Indiana?
5 posted on
07/01/2011 8:24:23 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: DemforBush
Operation Shakedown is a revenue enhancement policy which helps speed up the redistribution of wealth. If you look too impoverished to pay a fine or "look" illegal, you get a pass. Otherwise it looks like profiling. Welcome to the New Ameriʞa.
6 posted on
07/01/2011 8:25:17 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire but I swear I didn't see him in the rearview mirror.)
To: DemforBush
“I don’t want to be drunk in Pu-blick. I want to be drunk in a bar”...Ron White
To: DemforBush
"Someone who's trying to do something right is going to be made into a criminal (doing) something we've asked them to do -- don't drink and drive. So now, it's don't drink and ride," Young said. "We shouldn't arrest them because they've taken a ride instead of driving a car." That sums it up for me.
An Indiana Supreme Court ruling this week is a timely, cautionary reminder for Hoosiers who plan to consume alcohol over the holiday weekend. It is possible to be charged with public intoxication, even while in a vehicle with a designated driver.
The judicial branches in our country are quickly eroding our liberties, legislating from the bench in this manner.
We are dealing with oligarchic renegades at this time.
To: DemforBush
All righty then. Good thing I don’t live in Indiana. Be some judgie wudgies looking for a place to F@@@ING hide.
10 posted on
07/01/2011 8:31:38 PM PDT by
bigheadfred
( He put... creatures... in our bodies... to control our minds.)
To: DemforBush
It is the unstated goal of the Marxist/Super Stateists to make so many laws that everyone is a criminal. Then their TOTAL power over the people will be achieved.
15 posted on
07/01/2011 8:39:31 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: DemforBush
then why bother having a designated driver. Going after bar and restaurant business now? You can’t drink and drive. So, now you can’t drive and not drink or just not drink and not drive. or just not drink period. Must be a dem law its the only way it makes sense...even then NOT
16 posted on
07/01/2011 8:39:52 PM PDT by
merryberry
(Riots in Europe, Riots in Far East, Iran with nukes...Bueller?..Bueller?..OBAMA?....crickets)
To: DemforBush
Kind of defeating purpose isn’t it?
17 posted on
07/01/2011 8:40:06 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: DemforBush
There is more to this story.
21 posted on
07/01/2011 8:46:01 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: DemforBush
Sorry, now I get it, bars will have to make room for drunk cots for anyone over the limit..ride or not. smh...or only serve soda that way they’re completely off the hook (and out of business)
26 posted on
07/01/2011 8:53:00 PM PDT by
merryberry
(In dog oxycodone years...my dog was smart enough to never have one. Bacon. bacon whose got the baco)
To: DemforBush
I’d be real curious what MADD has to say about this law....to spend countless years and money to convince society that a designated driver is all you need...and then this?
Would hate to be a bar or restaurant owner in Indiana - no one will get home unfined.....Might as well order Pizza-delivered.
38 posted on
07/01/2011 9:19:39 PM PDT by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Dept. of Life, Dept. of Liberty and the Dept. of Happiness)
To: DemforBush
How about those holiday times of the year when organizations offer "free rides" home if you've been drinking.
Under this law you would be subject to arrest because you avoided driving your vehicle while intoxicated (DWI). Instead you'll now be cited for "Riding while intoxicated" (RWI)
To: DemforBush
couldn’t one just as easily be accused of vagrancy for failure to produce I.D., even though you are a passenger?
56 posted on
07/01/2011 11:03:35 PM PDT by
Vendome
("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
To: DemforBush
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws."
Ayn Rand - Atlas Shrugged
58 posted on
07/02/2011 12:56:59 AM PDT by
RasterMaster
(FU DUh-bama and the JACKASS you rode in on!)
To: DemforBush
Basically then, its illegal to get drunk in Indiana. This is crazy. You have one too many, do the responsible thing and get a friend to drive you home, and you still get arrested.
60 posted on
07/02/2011 6:10:57 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: DemforBush
This is one of the dumbest things I've seen from a PD in a long time.
They should be encouraging drunks to ride rather than drive.
Silly cops, stupid is for commies.
66 posted on
07/02/2011 9:41:27 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson