It is a lie that Mormons practice polygamy. That was over 100 years ago and today polygamy will get you excommunicated. I wish the anti Mormons would stop lying about this.
Whatever. I’m not going to post anymore. Bye bye and God bless.
There are lds groups that have left because the view SLC lds are an abomination to Joseph Smith and his teachings, they follow the original non changed rules/ regs of Joseph Smith.
There are no anti-mormons posters but there are many anti-mormonISM poster.
“It is a lie that Mormons practice polygamy. That was over 100 years ago and today polygamy will get you excommunicated. I wish the anti Mormons would stop lying about this.”
There are mormons today that practice polygamy, just like Joseph Smith and Bring ‘Em Young did. They follow the mormon scriptures just as they are written.
“Whatever. Im not going to post anymore. Bye bye and God bless.”
Facts?
Evidence?
Logic?
Zip.
Same story, 18th verse... see ya next time Sandy.
Not so, oh accusatory one.
First of all, I recommend you give up mind-reading; it reflects poorly on you -- not to mention grading vs. posting rules. A Lie is something with specific intent. How do you prove that, Sandy? With your Joseph Smith factory outlet rocks?
Secondly, the "excommunication" reference you gave...
(a)...didn't apply to Mormons in the first third of the 20th century...Mormon leaders at that time let polygamists be...And even since then, I haven't heard of the Mormon church excommunicating any polygamists among those supposedly living near Kolob...have you?
(b)...doesn't apparently apply to Mormon general authorities TODAY who've double-dipped at the eternal marriage well...Or do you deny the Mormon doctrine of eternal polygamy? (No? Then just move on, Sandy...PR spinism doesn't work around people who have access to the same handbooks Mormon bishops do)
Besides, Sandy...surely even you must be looking forward to the day when the Mormon jesus returns...and McConkie, as Lds "apostle," promised us a new millennium of earthly polygamy. Tell us, Sandy, when that time comes, how many more wives is your husband going to choose?
Oh, btw, the spin you give on polygamy isn't making it past the media and ex-Mormons like Carma Naylor. Carma was just interviewed this week for a June 22, 2011 article on the new ad campaign in NY. Here's what the article says in the Christian Post:
In the past few years, Mormons have lost numerous PR battles with the American public. Television shows like Sister Wives and Big Love showcase a sect of Mormonism that practices polygamy, a practice that the church outlawed in the late 1800s. Also, the Tony-award winning musical Book of Mormon portrays Mormons as simplistic and a bit naïve. Words like weird, homophobic, and cultish are often associated with the church. Therefore, it is easy to see why the church would want a PR makeover. However, Carma Naylor, author of the book A Mormons Unexpected Journey, which details her life decision to turn from Mormonism to Christianity, is a bit skeptical of the campaign. Its great if a religion wants to abandon error and turn from false prophets but to deny what their leaders teach is wrong. You cant sweep it under the rug, Naylor told The Christian Post. She explains that polygamy is still in the Mormon doctrine and it is a message that Joseph Smith taught.
Source: Mormon Ad Campaign Could Confuse Christians, Ex-Mormon Warns
The 'revelation' that smith had to justify polygamy - Doctrines and covenants section 132 is still mormon canon SD, and today's mormon men expect to have more than one wife in heaven - forget that you can be replaced by your hubby SD?
So if the 'revelation' is not DOCTRINE SD - why is DC 132 still enshrined as DOCTRINE SD? Then smith taught false doctrines according to your definition SD.
Whatever. Im not going to post anymore. Bye bye and God bless.
Running away again because mormonism cannot stand the light of God's truth.
It's is STILL MORMON scripture!!
REAL mormons actually FOLLOW it!
Fearful ones (SLC branch) IGNORE their GOD and OBEY the All Powerful US government!
Yeah...
We've heard THAT before!