Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby star blasts jets of water into space
PhysOrg.com ^ | June 22, 2011 | By Joel N. Shurkin

Posted on 06/22/2011 11:26:59 AM PDT by Red Badger

Astronomers have found a nascent star 750 light years from earth that shoots colossal jets of water -- a cosmic fire hose -- out its poles in bullet-like pulses.

In a process that almost defies adjectives and analogies, each jet of water is the equivalent of a hundred million times the water flowing through the Amazon River every second and the speed of the jet is the equivalent of 80 times the muzzle velocity of an AK-47 assault rifle.

The blast creates huge shockwaves around the star and the process may be responsible for sprinkling the universe with water.

And it could go on for a thousand years in each star. Astronomers think all baby stars go through this process as they form, and that our sun did it too once.

The protostar was found in the Perseus constellation in an object called L1448-MM, seen from the earth to the right of the Pleiades, also called the Seven Sisters cluster of stars, in the constellation of Taurus. It is called a low-mass protostar, meaning it is just beginning to grow into a star.

While jets like that have been seen in other baby stars, astronomers, using the European Space Agency’'s Herschel infrared orbiting telescope were able to measure the flow of the jets using water molecules as the tracer.

Lars E. Kristensen, a postdoctoral student at the Leiden University in the Netherlands, an author of the paper, said that all stars are formed by the accretion of dust and other particles in interstellar space and are eventually surrounded by a disk of material that falls into the star as it builds.

The disks are something like the rings of Saturn but far less well-defined, he said, "more puffy."

Material that is not used by the forming star is blasted back out into space from the poles, perpendicular to the angle of the disks.

"We don’'t know the launching point or the exact launching mechanism," Kristensen said. "There is no self-consistent theory that can explain what we are seeing."

The stream of gasses is about 180,000 degrees Fahrenheit, so the water is not liquid, but rather atoms of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, the building block of water. When it gets into space and the molecules interact with the dust surrounding the star, however, and the atoms probably combine to form water ice.

Kristensen and the European astronomers described the jets of being made up of "bullets" of water but that is a bit misleading. The water actually pulses, like a fire hose with an unsteady water supply.

Kristensen says the pulses fly out at 50 kilometers a second, or about 120,000 mph. As a pulse starts to slow, it is rammed from behind by pulses moving faster behind it, producing something like a bow shock wave. Those collisions are what the telescope sees and what he described as bullets.

Each pulse could last a year, which for an astronomer is shorter than a blink. The bullets are going so fast they eventually fly beyond the accretion disk and the gas cloud around the protostar. The shock waves eventually dissipate.

Besides the hydrogen and oxygen atoms, the jet streams are known to include carbon dioxide and silicon oxide molecules. The Herschel is capable of spotting the light signatures of the atoms through the gas cloud that surrounds L1448-MM.

No one knows how long this process lasts. Eventually, the star reaches maturity and has acquired all the material it needs and the whole process of making a star shuts down, which could be anywhere from one to ten million years.

"We've known about these jets before," said astronomer Mark Krumholz of the University of California at Santa Cruz, who was not part of the research team, but the measurement "is far more precise." Krumholz agrees that all stars go through this birth process and said that the use of water as a tracer gives astronomers a handy tool to measure these jets.

Provided by Inside Science News Service


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; cosmos; seaofstars; space; star; universe; velikovsky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: grey_whiskers
Numbers don't "feel" right, but Mrs. Whisk is telling me to go shopping.

Heigh-ho, if anyone finds the error, let me know.

Cheers!

61 posted on 06/22/2011 6:34:26 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
Was she country or rock and roll?

At this point , it doesn't matter!.................

62 posted on 06/23/2011 5:29:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Obviously - however - I must point out -

You are left in SERIOUS sci-fi land -

Your oceans aren’t water anymore, unless you want the oceans made of water and the life based on “molecule X” -

Flip the logic around - and you have the most fantastically complex set of circumstances, that need to happen with an entirely different chemistry. “Silicon based life forms” may sound cool on TV, but the reality is unimaginably complex.

Just an aside - the stars “just happen” to spew the one molecule that expands when it changes state from liquid to gas.


63 posted on 06/23/2011 6:51:14 PM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eldon Tyrell
“Silicon based life forms” may sound cool on TV, but the reality is unimaginably complex.

In our current universe with its current rules, such as result in water spewing out of stars, yes. In a different universe with different rules, one where silicon spews out of stars, maybe not so complex. It's just a frame of view.

64 posted on 06/27/2011 11:04:55 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

You might want to re-read what you wrote, and realize what you just said.

Do you have any evidence of any other universe with any other set of physical laws? I mean - sure - if one accepts the pretense that anything is possible - then anything is possible. At which point - everything is meaningless.


65 posted on 06/28/2011 9:46:53 PM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson